Literature DB >> 21348471

Greenhouse gas emission reductions from domestic anaerobic digesters linked with sustainable sanitation in rural China.

Radhika Dhingra1, Erick R Christensen, Yang Liu, Bo Zhong, Chang-Fu Wu, Michael G Yost, Justin V Remais.   

Abstract

Anaerobic digesters provide clean, renewable energy (biogas) by converting organic waste to methane, and are a key part of China's comprehensive rural energy plan. Here, experimental and modeling results are used to quantify the net greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction from substituting a household anaerobic digester for traditional energy sources in Sichuan, China. Tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy and radial plume mapping were used to estimate the mass flux of fugitive methane emissions from active digesters. Using household energy budgets, the net improvement in GHG emissions associated with biogas installation was estimated using global warming commitment (GWC) as a consolidated measure of the warming effects of GHG emissions from cooking. In all scenarios biogas households had lower GWC than nonbiogas households, by as much as 54%. Even biogas households with methane leakage exhibited lower GWC than nonbiogas households, by as much as 48%. Based only on the averted GHG emissions over 10 years, the monetary value of a biogas installation was conservatively estimated at US$28.30 ($16.07 ton(-1) CO(2)-eq), which is available to partly offset construction costs. The interaction of biogas installation programs with policies supporting improved stoves, renewable harvesting of biomass, and energy interventions with substantial health cobenefits are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21348471      PMCID: PMC3733461          DOI: 10.1021/es103142y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  9 in total

Review 1.  Environmental health in China: progress towards clean air and safe water.

Authors:  Junfeng Zhang; Denise L Mauzerall; Tong Zhu; Song Liang; Majid Ezzati; Justin V Remais
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Applying open-path FTIR with computed tomography to evaluate personal exposures. Part 1: simulation studies.

Authors:  Chang-Fu Wu; Michael G Yost; Ram A Hashmonay; Timothy V Larson; Steven E Guffey
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2004-12-16

Review 3.  Co-benefits of climate mitigation and health protection in energy systems: scoping methods.

Authors:  Kirk R Smith; Evan Haigler
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  Ouantification of carbon savings from improved biomass cookstove projects.

Authors:  Michael Johnson; Rufus Edwards; Adrián Ghilardi; Victor Berrueta; Dan Gillen; Claudio Alatorre Frenk; Omar Masera
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 5.  Policies for accelerating access to clean energy, improving health, advancing development, and mitigating climate change.

Authors:  Andy Haines; Kirk R Smith; Dennis Anderson; Paul R Epstein; Anthony J McMichael; Ian Roberts; Paul Wilkinson; James Woodcock; Jeremy Woods
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Field evaluation of a method for estimating gaseous fluxes from area sources using open-path Fourier transform infrared.

Authors:  R A Hashmonay; D F Natschke; K Wagoner; D B Harris; E L Thompson; M G Yost
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: household energy.

Authors:  Paul Wilkinson; Kirk R Smith; Michael Davies; Heather Adair; Ben G Armstrong; Mark Barrett; Nigel Bruce; Andy Haines; Ian Hamilton; Tadj Oreszczyn; Ian Ridley; Cathryn Tonne; Zaid Chalabi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Models to predict emissions of health-damaging pollutants and global warming contributions of residential fuel/stove combinations in China.

Authors:  Rufus D Edwards; Kirk R Smith; Junfeng Zhang; Yuqing Ma
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Leveraging rural energy investment for parasitic disease control: schistosome ova inactivation and energy co-benefits of anaerobic digesters in rural China.

Authors:  Justin Remais; Lin Chen; Edmund Seto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Low-carbon yak cheese: transition to biogas in a Himalayan socio-technical niche.

Authors:  Ben Campbell; Paul Sallis
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Life Cycle Assessment of Biogas Production in Small-scale Household Digesters in Vietnam.

Authors:  T K V Vu; D Q Vu; L S Jensen; S G Sommer; S Bruun
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Biogas Cook Stoves for Healthy and Sustainable Diets? A Case Study in Southern India.

Authors:  Tal Lee Anderman; Ruth S DeFries; Stephen A Wood; Roseline Remans; Richie Ahuja; Shujayath E Ulla
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2015-09-16

4.  Estimating the health effects of greenhouse gas mitigation strategies: addressing parametric, model, and valuation challenges.

Authors:  Justin V Remais; Jeremy J Hess; Kristie L Ebi; Anil Markandya; John M Balbus; Paul Wilkinson; Andy Haines; Zaid Chalabi
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.