| Literature DB >> 21347415 |
Donald S Chen1, Alyssa E Barry, Aleksandra Leliwa-Sytek, Terry-Ann Smith, Ingrid Peterson, Stuart M Brown, Florence Migot-Nabias, Philippe Deloron, Moses M Kortok, Kevin Marsh, Johanna P Daily, Daouda Ndiaye, Ousmane Sarr, Souleymane Mboup, Karen P Day.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The reservoir of Plasmodium infection in humans has traditionally been defined by blood slide positivity. This study was designed to characterize the local reservoir of infection in relation to the diverse var genes that encode the major surface antigen of Plasmodium falciparum blood stages and underlie the parasite's ability to establish chronic infection and transmit from human to mosquito. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21347415 PMCID: PMC3036650 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016629
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Clonal antigenic variation and parasite persistence.
Asexual P. falciparum parasitemia followed over time in a naturally infected Puerto Rican child. The parasitemia follows a pattern of recurrent peaks that decline in amplitude with time. The parasitemia in this child, believed to be a clone, lasted nearly 800 days. These successive peaks of parasitemia are consistent with antigenically distinct waves of parasitemia in P. falciparum infection believed to be mediated by PfEMP1 that allow for parasite persistence [14]. The intra-host dynamics of parasitemia observed in semi-immune children [3] and induced human infections [49] are best explained by variant-specific immunity to PfEMP1 variants encoded by the var multigene family [50] rather than by immunity to single-copy antigen genes. Figure composed using data from [51].
Characteristics of the populations surveyed.
| Survey Site | Date of collection | Annual EIR (infective bites/person/year) | Human pop. size | Clinical presentation | Age of individuals surveyed | Age-specific pop. size | Age-specific | Age-specific mean MOI | Total # of genomes in the age-specific pop. |
|
| 2000 | 102 | 3,000 | Asymptomatic | 6 months - 10 years | 848 | 51.7% | 2 | 877 |
|
| 2000–2005 | 0.014–0.86 | 768,826 | Uncomplicated malaria, outpatient. | 5 years and older | 635,514 | 3.6% | 1.42 | 32,487 |
|
| 2002 | 0.0–53 | 350,000 | Non-severe malaria, hospitalized | 2 to 104 months | 106,784 | 19% | 2.32 | 47,070 |
|
| 1999 | 44–293 | 5,300 | Asymptomatic | 6 months – 11 years | 2153 | 37.4% | 1.82 | 1466 |
|
| 2001–2006 | 10 | 380,884 | Asymptomatic to acute, non-severe | Not specified | 380,884 | 0.46% | 1.79 | 3136 |
Characteristics of the populations surveyed are listed in this table. For comparison, population characteristics corresponding to the Amele and Porto Velho published datasets are included. The population level data are estimated from published surveys and/or calculated as described:
a. Sources for annual Entomological Inoculation Rate (EIR): Bakoumba [22]; Pikine [24]; Kilifi [27]; Amele [52]; Porto Velho [53]. EIR reported as daily rates have been converted to annual rates by multiplying by 365. The Amele EIR estimate is specific to P. falciparum and excludes P. vivax infected bites.
b. Sources for population (pop.) estimates: Bakoumba [54]; Pikine (2002 Census) [55]; Kilifi (extrapolation based on demographic surveillance population) [56]; Amele (1987 survey) [57]; Porto Velho (2004 Census) [58].
c. Age-specific population sizes were estimated by multiplying the age-structured population frequencies by the total population size. Where the age-specific population in this study overlapped only partially with reported age groups, the proportion of overlap within the age group was used for the calculation. Country-level populations frequencies for Gabon, Kenya, and Senegal were calculated from reference [59]. For the Amele population, population frequencies were calculated from the age structure of the surveyed individuals in reference [60], reported to match the age structure of the population. For the Porto Velho, all age groups were included.
d. Sources for age-specific P. falciparum (Pf) prevalence estimates: Bakoumba [61]; Pikine [24]; Kilifi (2002 estimate) [56]; Amele [62]; Porto Velho [63].
e. Age-specific multiplicity of infection (MOI) estimates were derived from the following sources: Bakoumba [20]; Pikine [64] scoring multiple infections as double infections; Kilifi [65] simple average of the two sites; Amele [48] using all three markers; Porto Velho [66] using all three markers and counting multiple infections as double infections. These estimates of MOI reflect the age-range from which the samples were taken and are used to project the total circulating genomes in each population. They do not reflect the mean MOI for the study sites across all age groups.
f. Estimated total number of genomes in the age-specific population was calculated as:
Var sampling and estimated var type richness in African and non-African populations.
| Site | Genomes sampled | Unique | Observed | No. of | Chao1 richness estimate (95% CI) | ACE richness estimate | Proportion of total types sampled |
|
| 29 | 787 | 666 | 597 (90%) | 4540 (3452–6053) | 5557 | 15% |
|
| 29 | 672 | 603 | 554 (92%) | 5116 (3712–7156) | 4844 | 12% |
|
| 30 | 699 | 656 | 622 (95%) | 7565 (5292–10951) | 8028 | 9% |
|
| 30 | 452 | 180 | 103 (57%) | 369 (290–506) | 370 | 49% |
|
| 42 | 443 | 140 | 59 (42%) | 232 (186–332) | 205 | 60% |
For each population, the total number of genomes sampled, the non-redundant DBLα block D-H tags recovered, and the number of distinct var types identified are summarized. Estimates of richness (total var types) are listed using Chao1 and ACE estimators. Figures for Amele and Porto Velho were derived using published sequence data.
a. Calculated as follows:
Figure 2Diversity and sharing of var types among African and non-African populations.
A) Cumulative diversity curves for each of the five populations. These averaged curves plot the cumulative number of var types observed with successive sampling of var sequences. A well-sampled population will show a curve that levels off and approaches an asymptote, that would approximate the total number of types in the population. The curves from the three African populations (Bakoumba, Pikine, Kilifi) did not show evidence of leveling off, in contrast to the curves from Amele, Papua New Guinea [17] or Porto Velho, Brazil [19]. Sampling of the African populations has not yet begun to approach the limits of diversity. B) Sharing of var types among the three African population samples. Between 26 and 41 var types were shared among any two population samples; only 10 var types were found in all three populations. C) The majority of var types in each continent were not found in the other continents. Only 5 var types were found in all three continents. Samples from Bakoumba, Pikine, and Kilifi represent Africa, samples from Amele represent Asia-Pacific, and samples from Porto Velho represent the Americas.
Figure 3Frequency distribution of var types in the five population samples. Bakoumba, Kilifi, Pikine, Amele, and Porto Velho.
In parenthesis next to each population is the number of isolates (n) sampled from the population. On the horizontal axis is the frequency class (in number of isolates) for each var type. The vertical axis depicts the number of var types found in each frequency class. For example, in the Kilifi dataset 622 var types were found in one isolate; 28 var types were each found in two isolates, etc. In the African populations, the overwhelming majority of var types were found in only one isolate. Differences in frequency distribution of var sequences were statistically significant by χ2 analysis (p<0.0001) (Table S6).
Figure 4Organization of var genes in Africa (Bakoumba, Kilifi, Pikine), PNG (Amele) and Brazil (Porto Velho).
Within each labeled population, columns represent individual parasite isolates, and the black boxes represent var genes found in that isolate. Black boxes at the top of Figure 4 represent rare var types (found only in one isolate). Black boxes in the lower portion of Figure 4 depict var types that were found in more than one isolate within a population. For var types found in more than one isolate, each row represents a distinct type within the population. The key at the bottom-left of Figure 4 depicts frequency (in number of isolates) with which a particular var type was found in the population sample. Var types found more frequently were placed towards the bottom of the figure. White space represents an unknown number of var types that were not sequenced. Note that the amount of whitespace is not associated with numbers of genes missing, but was necessary to demonstrate sharing among repertoires. There was greater sharing of var types among isolates in the non-African populations compared to the African populations. Among the African populations, there appears to be more var type sharing in the Bakoumba population.
Figure 5Relationship between var richness estimates and malariometric indices.
For each population sampled, var richness estimated using the Chao1 equation is plotted against A) parasite prevalence and B) transmission as represented by entomological inoculation rate (EIR). We have used published parasite prevalence and EIR figures which are listed in Table 1. Where EIR has been reported as a range, we have plotted the midpoint of the range. The bars above and below each point represent the 95% confidence interval of the Chao1 estimate. Despite differences in transmission intensity and parasite prevalence, the local African populations all exhibited high estimates of var richness, roughly a log-order greater than the non-African populations.