Literature DB >> 17788203

Dominance and Diversity in Land Plant Communities: Numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution.

R H Whittaker.   

Abstract

Most plant communities consist of several or many species which compete for light, water, and nutrients. Species in a given community may be ranked by their relative success in competition; productivity seems to be the best measure of their success or importance in the community. Curves of decreasing productivity connect the few most important species (the dominants) with a larger number of species of intermediate importance (whose number primarily determines the community's diversity or richness in species) and a smaller number of rare species. These curves are of varied forms and are believed to express different patterns of competition and niche differentiation in communities. It is probably true of plants, as of animals, that no two species in a stable community occupy the same niche. Evolution of niche differentiation makes possible the occurrence together of many plant species which are partial, rather than direct, competitors. Species tend to evolve also toward habitat differentiation, toward scattering of their centers of maximum population density in relation to environmental gradients, so that few species are competing with one another in their population centers. Evolution of both niche and habitat differentiation permits many species to exist together in communities as partial competitors, with distributions broadly and continuously overlapping, forming the landscape's many intergrading communities.

Year:  1965        PMID: 17788203     DOI: 10.1126/science.147.3655.250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  96 in total

Review 1.  The interpretation of biological surveys.

Authors:  Graham Bell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Similar taxonomic richness but different communities of ectomycorrhizas in native forests and non-native plantation forests.

Authors:  Richard O'Hanlon; Thomas J Harrington
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.387

3.  Experimental demonstration of the importance of competition under disturbance.

Authors:  Cyrille Violle; Zhichao Pu; Lin Jiang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Toward a trophic theory of species diversity.

Authors:  John W Terborgh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Relationships between arthropod richness, evenness, and diversity are altered by complementarity among plant genotypes.

Authors:  Scott H McArt; Susan C Cook-Patton; Jennifer S Thaler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Putting the plants back into plant ecology: six pragmatic models for understanding and conserving plant diversity.

Authors:  Paul Keddy
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Bird niches in a subalpine forest: An indirect ordination.

Authors:  S R Sabo; R H Whittaker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Spatial structure leads to ecological breakdown and loss of diversity.

Authors:  Gerda Saxer; Michael Doebeli; Michael Travisano
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Macrobenthic surveys as a valuable tool for assessing freshwater quality in the Iberian Peninsula.

Authors:  J A Camargo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce the differences in competitiveness between dominant and subordinate plant species.

Authors:  Pierre Mariotte; Claire Meugnier; David Johnson; Aurélie Thébault; Thomas Spiegelberger; Alexandre Buttler
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 3.387

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.