Literature DB >> 21346982

VA-INPC: Linking Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC) data to assess surveillance testing among veterans with colorectal cancer.

David A Haggstrom1, Marc Rosenman, Laura J Myers, Evgenia Teal, Bradley N Doebbeling.   

Abstract

The goal of this project was to provide empiric evidence about the benefit to US veterans and the VA of capturing data from a citywide clinical informatics network (INPC) to assess care received outside the VA. We identified 468 veterans diagnosed with colorectal cancer from 2000-2007 in the Indianapolis VA cancer registry. Electronic VA healthcare data were linked with electronic health records from the regional health information organization (RHIO) INPC; 341 matches were found. Both the VA and INPC systems were queried regarding receipt of surveillance tests. The proportion with additional data from INPC varied by test: colonoscopy (3%), CT scan/abdomen (13%), CT scan/chest (79%), carcinoembryonic antigen test (8%), and other laboratory tests (25%-53%). An incremental benefit of linking VA and INPC data was present and may increase when expanded beyond patients with a single condition. New, important information about care outside the VA is obtained through RHIO data linkage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21346982      PMCID: PMC3041390     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  15 in total

1.  Bowel surveillance patterns after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer in Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  K B Knopf; J L Warren; E J Feuer; M L Brown
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Linked insurance-tumor registry database for health services research.

Authors:  B N Doebbeling; D K Wyant; K D McCoy; S Riggs; R F Woolson; D Wagner; R T Wilson; C F Lynch
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The Indiana network for patient care: a working local health information infrastructure. An example of a working infrastructure collaboration that links data from five health systems and hundreds of millions of entries.

Authors:  Clement J McDonald; J Marc Overhage; Michael Barnes; Gunther Schadow; Lonnie Blevins; Paul R Dexter; Burke Mamlin
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 4.  Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G M Jeffery; B E Hickey; P Hider
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

5.  The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  Hashem B El-Serag; Laura Petersen; Howard Hampel; Peter Richardson; Gregory Cooper
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-11-13

6.  Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline.

Authors:  Christopher E Desch; Al B Benson; Mark R Somerfield; Patrick J Flynn; Carol Krause; Charles L Loprinzi; Bruce D Minsky; David G Pfister; Katherine S Virgo; Nicholas J Petrelli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Andrew G Renehan; Matthias Egger; Mark P Saunders; Sarah T O'Dwyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

8.  Mortality and follow-up colonoscopy after colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Deborah A Fisher; Amy Jeffreys; Steven C Grambow; Dawn Provenzale
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Geographic variation among Medicare beneficiaries in the use of colorectal carcinoma screening procedures.

Authors:  Gregory S Cooper; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: a practice guideline.

Authors:  Alvaro Figueredo; R Bryan Rumble; Jean Maroun; Craig C Earle; Bernard Cummings; Robin McLeod; Lisa Zuraw; Caroline Zwaal
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  1 in total

1.  Frequency and Correlates of Pediatric High-Flow Nasal Cannula Use for Bronchiolitis, Asthma, and Pneumonia.

Authors:  Colin M Rogerson; Aaron E Carroll; Wanzhu Tu; Tian He; Titus K Schleyer; Courtney M Rowan; Arthur H Owora; Eneida A Mendonca
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.339

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.