Literature DB >> 15307875

Geographic variation among Medicare beneficiaries in the use of colorectal carcinoma screening procedures.

Gregory S Cooper1, Siran M Koroukian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study geographic variation in the use of recommended screening procedures for colorectal carcinoma.
METHODS: All Medicare claims for fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, barium enema and two reference procedures, upper endoscopy, and upper gastrointestinal series in patients > or = 65 yr were obtained from the 1997-1999 physician-supplier and outpatient files. State-level procedure rates and the change in rates from 1997 to 1999 were calculated.
RESULTS: The median annual rates were as follows: FOBT, 14.54%; flexible sigmoidoscopy, 3.03%; colonoscopy, 6.22%; barium enema, 2.21%; upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, 4.88%; and upper gastrointestinal series, 2.78%. Whereas there was at least a 50% difference between the 25th and 75th percentiles for state rates of FOBT and sigmoidoscopy, the variation in other procedures was more modest. State-level rates of colonoscopy and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were highly correlated (r = 0.79; p < 0.0001), as were the rates of barium enema and upper gastrointestinal series (r = 0.68; p < 0.0001). Universal increases in colonoscopy use (median +25.0%) and decreases in barium enema use (median -20.9%) from 1997 to 1999 were observed among individual states.
CONCLUSIONS: There is variation at the state level in the use of some, but not all colorectal procedures, as well as fairly consistent temporal trends. The etiology of the differences is not clear, but the correlation in the rates of selected procedures suggests the presence of local practice patterns. Copyright 2004 American College of Gastroenterology

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15307875     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30902.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  30 in total

1.  School-based health centers: cost-benefit analysis and impact on health care disparities.

Authors:  Jeff J Guo; Terrance J Wade; Wei Pan; Kathryn N Keller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  An evidence-based microsimulation model for colorectal cancer: validation and application.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; James E Savarino
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Practice variation in PEG tube placement: trends and predictors among providers in the United States.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; Michelle Nazareth; Justin L Sewell; J Lucas Williams; David A Lieberman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  Ethnic disparities in colonoscopy use among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Heidi Woo; Tatiana D Starr; Lina H Jandorf; Katherine N DuHamel
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  VA-INPC: Linking Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC) data to assess surveillance testing among veterans with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  David A Haggstrom; Marc Rosenman; Laura J Myers; Evgenia Teal; Bradley N Doebbeling
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

6.  Cost Differences After Initial CT Colonography Versus Optical Colonoscopy in the Elderly.

Authors:  Hanna M Zafar; Jianing Yang; Katrina Armstrong; Peter Groeneveld
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Morris Weinberger; John Z Ayanian; Noel T Brewer; Craig C Earle; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Deborah A Fisher; Bryan J Weiner; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Variation in receipt of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery: assessing the impact of physicians and geographic regions.

Authors:  Aaron J Feinstein; Pamela R Soulos; Jessica B Long; Jeph Herrin; Kenneth B Roberts; James B Yu; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: variation by physician and geographic region.

Authors:  Kristin M Sheffield; Yimei Han; Yong-Fang Kuo; Taylor S Riall; James S Goodwin
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Predictors of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening over time in 11 states.

Authors:  Lee Mobley; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Matthew Urato; John Boos; Nancy Lozano-Gracia; Luc Anselin
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.