Literature DB >> 21346962

You can lead a horse to water: physicians' responses to clinical reminders.

Stephen M Downs1, Vibha Anand, Tammy M Dugan, Aaron E Carroll.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Meaningful use of health information technology (HIT) requires the use of clinical decision support systems (CDSS). However, the effectiveness of CDSS depends on physician compliance with clinical reminders which is known to be highly variable. Our objective was to evaluate physician adherence to clinical reminders from a CDSS designed to maximize features known to improve practice.
METHODS: We evaluated physicians' compliance with clinical reminders generated by the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system, a pediatric CDSS that generates scannable paper forms that are completed by patients, staff and physicians during routine care. The forms provide tailored reminders and collect coded clinical data during routine care. We examined CHICA's database to assess the rates of response by patients and physicians to questions and reminders generated by the system. Results showed that while patients answered, on average, 60.6% of 1,351,896 questions generated by the system over 5 years, physicians responded to only 42.9% of 343,949 alerts and reminders over the same period of time. Response rates appeared to be inversely related to both the complexity and sensitivity of the topic. DISCUSSION: Poor physician adherence to clinical reminders in this optimized system reduces effectiveness of the system and poses some liability issues. Strategies to alert physicians to the reminders of highest import are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21346962      PMCID: PMC3041342     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  22 in total

1.  Expected value prioritization of prompts and reminders.

Authors:  Stephen M Downs; Hasmet Uner
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

2.  Using adaptive turnaround documents to electronically acquire structured data in clinical settings.

Authors:  Paul G Biondich; Vibha Anand; Stephen M Downs; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

3.  Adherence to computerized clinical reminders in a large healthcare delivery network.

Authors:  Abha Agrawal; Michael F Mayo-Smith
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

4.  Health information technology: initial set of standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology. Interim final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2010-01-13

5.  Arden Syntax for Medical Logic Modules.

Authors:  G Hripcsak
Journal:  MD Comput       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr

6.  Primary care physicians' response to domestic violence. Opening Pandora's box.

Authors:  N K Sugg; T Inui
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-06-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Rationale for the Arden Syntax.

Authors:  G Hripcsak; P Ludemann; T A Pryor; O B Wigertz; P D Clayton
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1994-08

8.  Cooking up an open source EMR for developing countries: OpenMRS - a recipe for successful collaboration.

Authors:  Burke W Mamlin; Paul G Biondich; Ben A Wolfe; Hamish Fraser; Darius Jazayeri; Christian Allen; Justin Miranda; William M Tierney
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

9.  The CHICA smoking cessation system.

Authors:  Stephen M Downs; Vivienne Zhu; Vibha Anand; Paul G Biondich; Aaron E Carroll
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

10.  Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation: the CHICA system.

Authors:  Vibha Anand; Paul G Biondich; Gilbert Liu; Marc Rosenman; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004
View more
  15 in total

1.  Leveraging electronic tablets for general pediatric care: a pilot study.

Authors:  V Anand; S McKee; T M Dugan; S M Downs
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  When does adoption of health information technology by physician practices lead to use by physicians within the practice?

Authors:  Sean R McClellan; Lawrence P Casalino; Stephen M Shortell; Diane R Rittenhouse
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Actionable recommendations in the Bright Futures child health supervision guidelines.

Authors:  S M E Finnell; J L Stanton; S M Downs
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  The Use of Computer Decision Support for Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea Detection in Primary Care.

Authors:  Sarah M Honaker; Ashley Street; Ameet S Daftary; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 4.062

5.  A six-year repeated evaluation of computerized clinical decision support system user acceptability.

Authors:  Randall W Grout; Erika R Cheng; Aaron E Carroll; Nerissa S Bauer; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Pediatricians' responses to printed clinical reminders: does highlighting prompts improve responsiveness?

Authors:  Kristin S Hendrix; Stephen M Downs; Aaron E Carroll
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.107

7.  Experience with decision support system and comfort with topic predict clinicians' responses to alerts and reminders.

Authors:  Nerissa S Bauer; Aaron E Carroll; Chandan Saha; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Inadequate Systems to Support Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practice.

Authors:  Marilyn M Schapira; Brian L Sprague; Carrie N Klabunde; Anna N A Tosteson; Asaf Bitton; Jane S Chen; Elisabeth F Beaber; Tracy Onega; Charles D MacLean; Kimberly Harris; Kathleen Howe; Loretta Pearson; Sarah Feldman; Phyllis Brawarsky; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Pediatric decision support using adapted Arden Syntax.

Authors:  Vibha Anand; Aaron E Carroll; Paul G Biondich; Tamara M Dugan; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 5.326

10.  Understanding why clinicians answer or ignore clinical decision support prompts.

Authors:  A E Carroll; V Anand; S M Downs
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.