Literature DB >> 21346929

Standardizing newborn screening results for health information exchange.

Swapna Abhyankar1, Michele A Lloyd-Puryear, Rebecca Goodwin, Sara Copeland, John Eichwald, Bradford L Therrell, Alan Zuckerman, Greg Downing, Clement J McDonald.   

Abstract

Newborn screening (NBS) is a complex process that has high-stakes health implications and requires rapid and effective communication between many people and organizations. Currently, each NBS laboratory has its own method of reporting results to state programs, hospitals and individual providers, with wide variation in content and format. Pediatric care providers receive reports by mail, email, fax or telephone, depending on whether the results are normal or abnormal. This process is slow and prone to errors, which can lead to delays in treatment. Multiple agencies worked together to create national guidance for reporting newborn screening results with HL7 messages that contain a prescribed set of LOINC and SNOMED CT codes, report quantitative test results, and use standardized units of measure. Several states are already implementing this guidance. If the guidance is used nationally, office EHRs could capture NBS results more efficiently, and regional and national registries could better analyze aggregate results to facilitate improvements in NBS and further research for these rare conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21346929      PMCID: PMC3041276     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  4 in total

1.  Health information technology: initial set of standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology. Interim final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2010-01-13

2.  Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Improving newborn screening laboratory test ordering and result reporting using health information exchange.

Authors:  Stephen M Downs; Peter C van Dyck; Piero Rinaldo; Clement McDonald; R Rodrey Howell; Alan Zuckerman; Gregory Downing
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Survey of pediatrician practices in retrieving statewide authorized newborn screening results.

Authors:  F Desposito; M A Lloyd-Puryear; T F Tonniges; F Rhein; M Mann
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.124

  4 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  An update on the use of health information technology in newborn screening.

Authors:  Swapna Abhyankar; Rebecca M Goodwin; Marci Sontag; Careema Yusuf; Jelili Ojodu; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.300

2.  Mapping local laboratory interface terms to LOINC at a German university hospital using RELMA V.5: a semi-automated approach.

Authors:  Christian Zunner; Thomas Bürkle; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Thomas Ganslandt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  The U.S. National Library of Medicine and standards for electronic health records: One thing led to another.

Authors:  Clement J McDonald; Betsy L Humphreys
Journal:  Inf Serv Use       Date:  2022-05-10

4.  Effects of immediate telephone follow-up with providers on sweat chloride test timing after cystic fibrosis newborn screening identifies a single mutation.

Authors:  Alison La Pean; Michael H Farrell; Kerry L Eskra; Philip M Farrell
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  A framework for assessing outcomes from newborn screening: on the road to measuring its promise.

Authors:  Cynthia F Hinton; Charles J Homer; Alexis A Thompson; Andrea Williams; Kathryn L Hassell; Lisa Feuchtbaum; Susan A Berry; Anne Marie Comeau; Bradford L Therrell; Amy Brower; Katharine B Harris; Christine Brown; Jana Monaco; Robert J Ostrander; Alan E Zuckerman; Celia Kaye; Denise Dougherty; Carol Greene; Nancy S Green
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.797

6.  Effort required to contact primary care providers after newborn screening identifies sickle cell trait.

Authors:  Stephanie A Christopher; Jenelle L Collins; Michael H Farrell
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 7.  The case for open science: rare diseases.

Authors:  Yaffa R Rubinstein; Peter N Robinson; William A Gahl; Paul Avillach; Gareth Baynam; Helene Cederroth; Rebecca M Goodwin; Stephen C Groft; Mats G Hansson; Nomi L Harris; Vojtech Huser; Deborah Mascalzoni; Julie A McMurry; Matthew Might; Christoffer Nellaker; Barend Mons; Dina N Paltoo; Jonathan Pevsner; Manuel Posada; Alison P Rockett-Frase; Marco Roos; Tamar B Rubinstein; Domenica Taruscio; Esther van Enckevort; Melissa A Haendel
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2020-09-11

Review 8.  The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening.

Authors:  Michael S Watson; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; R Rodney Howell
Journal:  Int J Neonatal Screen       Date:  2022-07-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.