Literature DB >> 20064796

Improving newborn screening laboratory test ordering and result reporting using health information exchange.

Stephen M Downs1, Peter C van Dyck, Piero Rinaldo, Clement McDonald, R Rodrey Howell, Alan Zuckerman, Gregory Downing.   

Abstract

Capture, coding and communication of newborn screening (NBS) information represent a challenge for public health laboratories, health departments, hospitals, and ambulatory care practices. An increasing number of conditions targeted for screening and the complexity of interpretation contribute to a growing need for integrated information-management strategies. This makes NBS an important test of tools and architecture for electronic health information exchange (HIE) in this convergence of individual patient care and population health activities. For this reason, the American Health Information Community undertook three tasks described in this paper. First, a newborn screening use case was established to facilitate standards harmonization for common terminology and interoperability specifications guiding HIE. Second, newborn screening coding and terminology were developed for integration into electronic HIE activities. Finally, clarification of privacy, security, and clinical laboratory regulatory requirements governing information exchange was provided, serving as a framework to establish pathways for improving screening program timeliness, effectiveness, and efficiency of quality patient care services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20064796      PMCID: PMC2995628          DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M3295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  10 in total

1.  Making the case for objective performance metrics in newborn screening by tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Piero Rinaldo; Saba Zafari; Silvia Tortorelli; Dietrich Matern
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2006

2.  Naming and counting disorders (conditions) included in newborn screening panels.

Authors:  Lawrence Sweetman; David S Millington; Bradford L Therrell; W Harry Hannon; Bradley Popovich; Michael S Watson; Marie Y Mann; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Peter C van Dyck
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Financing state newborn screening programs: sources and uses of funds.

Authors:  Kay Johnson; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Marie Y Mann; Lauren Raskin Ramos; Bradford L Therrell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Effectiveness of a clinical pathway for the emergency treatment of patients with inborn errors of metabolism.

Authors:  Dina J Zand; Kathleen M Brown; Uta Lichter-Konecki; Joyce K Campbell; Vesta Salehi; James M Chamberlain
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Advancing personalized health care through health information technology: an update from the American Health Information Community's Personalized Health Care Workgroup.

Authors:  John Glaser; Douglas E Henley; Gregory Downing; Kristin M Brinner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Comprehensive cost-utility analysis of newborn screening strategies.

Authors:  Aaron E Carroll; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Minimizing false-positives in universal newborn hearing screening: a simple solution.

Authors:  C J Clemens; S A Davis
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  The false-positive in universal newborn hearing screening.

Authors:  C J Clemens; S A Davis; A R Bailey
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Impact of Hurricane Katrina on newborn screening in Louisiana.

Authors:  Mark N Lobato; Emad Yanni; Arthur Hagar; Charles Myers; Alison Rue; Catherine Evans; Lauren A Lambert; Richard S Olney
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Newborn screening: toward a uniform screening panel and system.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 8.822

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Professional and geographical network effects on healthcare information exchange growth: does proximity really matter?

Authors:  Niam Yaraghi; Anna Ye Du; Raj Sharman; Ram D Gopal; R Ramesh; Ranjit Singh; Gurdev Singh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  An update on the use of health information technology in newborn screening.

Authors:  Swapna Abhyankar; Rebecca M Goodwin; Marci Sontag; Careema Yusuf; Jelili Ojodu; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Standardizing newborn screening results for health information exchange.

Authors:  Swapna Abhyankar; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Rebecca Goodwin; Sara Copeland; John Eichwald; Bradford L Therrell; Alan Zuckerman; Greg Downing; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

4.  Improving the Speed and Selectivity of Newborn Screening Using Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  James N Dodds; Erin S Baker
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  The Last Mile: Using Fax Machines to Exchange Data between Clinicians and Public Health.

Authors:  Stephen M Downs; Vibha Anand; Meena Sheley; Shaun J Grannis
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2011-12-22

6.  Postanalytical tools improve performance of newborn screening by tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Patricia L Hall; Gregg Marquardt; David M S McHugh; Robert J Currier; Hao Tang; Stephanie D Stoway; Piero Rinaldo
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 7.  Definitions, components and processes of data harmonisation in healthcare: a scoping review.

Authors:  Bey-Marrié Schmidt; Christopher J Colvin; Ameer Hohlfeld; Natalie Leon
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.796

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.