Literature DB >> 21345615

Image-guided radiotherapy for breast cancer patients: surgical clips as surrogate for breast excision cavity.

Rajko Topolnjak1, Peter de Ruiter, Peter Remeijer, Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij, Coen Rasch, Jan-Jakob Sonke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the use of surgical clips as a surrogate for localization of the excision cavity and to quantify the stability of the clips' positions during the course of external beam radiotherapy for breast cancer patients, using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-one breast cancer patients with surgical clips placed in the breast excision cavity were treated in a supine position with 28 daily fractions. CBCT scans were regularly acquired for a setup correction protocol. Retrospectively, the CBCT scans were registered to the planning CT scans, using gray-value registration of the excision cavity region and chamfer matching of the clips. Subsequently, residual setup errors (systematic [Σ] and random [σ]) of the excision cavity were estimated relative to the clips' registration. Finally, the stability of the clips' positions were quantified as the movement of each separate clip according to the center of gravity of the excision cavity.
RESULTS: When clips were used for online setup corrections, the residual errors of the excision cavity were Σ(left-right) = 1.2, σ(left-right) = 1.0; Σ(cranial-caudal)  = 1.3, σ(cranial-caudal) = 1.2; and Σ(anterior-posterior)  = 0.7, σ(anterior-posterior) = 0.9 mm. Furthermore, the average distance (over all patients) between the clips and centers of gravity of the excision cavities was 18.8 mm (on the planning CT) and was reduced to 17.4 mm (measured on the last CBCT scan).
CONCLUSION: Clips move in the direction of the center of gravity of the excision cavity, on average, 1.4 mm. The clips are good surrogates for locating the excision cavity and providing small residual errors.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21345615     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

1.  Setup accuracy for prone and supine whole breast irradiation.

Authors:  Thomas Mulliez; Akos Gulyban; Tom Vercauteren; Annick van Greveling; Bruno Speleers; Wilfried De Neve; Liv Veldeman
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Tumor bed radiotherapy in women following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer-safety margin with/without image guidance.

Authors:  Ales Hlavka; Jaroslav Vanasek; Karel Odrazka; Jan Stuk; Martin Dolezel; Vit Ulrych; Martina Vitkova; Jiri Mynarik; Iveta Kolarova; Zdenka Vilasova
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 3.  Treatment techniques to reduce cardiac irradiation for breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy: a review.

Authors:  Robert E Beck; Leonard Kim; Ning J Yue; Bruce G Haffty; Atif J Khan; Sharad Goyal
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  An investigation of image guidance dose for breast radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rosemerie Alvarado; Jeremy T Booth; Regina M Bromley; Helen B Gustafsson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Design of a new breast vacuum bag to reduce the global and local setup errors and to reduce PTV margin in post-mastectomy radiation therapy.

Authors:  Konglong Shen; Jie Xiong; Zhiguo Wang; Weifeng Wang; Wan Li; Jidan Zhou; Zhonghua Deng; Bin Li; Renming Zhong
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Target volume delineation in breast conserving radiotherapy: are co-registered CT and MR images of added value?

Authors:  Mirjam Mast; Emile Coerkamp; Mark Heijenbrok; Astrid Scholten; Wim Jansen; Erik Kouwenhoven; Jasper Nijkamp; Stephanie de Waard; Anna Petoukhova; Henk Struikmans
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  A multicentre study of the evidence for customized margins in photon breast boost radiotherapy.

Authors:  Emma J Harris; Mukesh B Mukesh; Ellen M Donovan; Anna M Kirby; Joanne S Haviland; Raj Jena; John Yarnold; Angela Baker; June Dean; Sally Eagle; Helen Mayles; Claire Griffin; Rosalind Perry; Andrew Poynter; Charlotte E Coles; Philip M Evans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Crawl positioning improves set-up precision and patient comfort in prone whole breast irradiation.

Authors:  Pieter Deseyne; Bruno Speleers; Wilfried De Neve; Bert Boute; Leen Paelinck; Vincent Vakaet; Hans Van Hulle; Max Schoepen; Michael Stouthandel; Annick Van Greveling; Giselle Post; Jan Detand; Chris Monten; Herman Depypere; Liv Veldeman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?

Authors:  Jurui Luo; Zhihai Yin; Zhen Zhang; Xiaomao Guo; Xiaoli Yu; Juanqi Wang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.