Literature DB >> 26405046

Short-Duration and Intensive Training Improves Long-Term Reaching Performance in Individuals With Chronic Stroke.

Hyeshin Park1, Sujin Kim2, Carolee J Winstein2, James Gordon2, Nicolas Schweighofer2.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that multiple sessions of reach training lead to long-term improvements in movement time and smoothness in individuals post-stroke. Yet such long-term training regimens are often difficult to implement in actual clinical settings. In this study, we evaluated the long-term and generalization effects of short-duration and intensive reach training in 16 individuals with chronic stroke and mild to moderate impairments. Participants performed 2 sessions of unassisted intensive reach training, with 600 movements per session, and with display of performance-based feedback after each movement. The participants' trunks were restrained with a belt to avoid compensatory movements. Training resulted in significant and durable (1 month) improvements in movement time (20.4% on average) and movement smoothness (22.7% on average). The largest improvements occurred in individuals with the largest initial motor impairments. In addition, training induced generalization to nontrained targets, which persisted in 1-day and in 1-month retention tests. Finally, there was a significant improvement in the Box and Block test from baseline to 1-month retention test (23% on average). Thus, short-duration and intensive reach training can lead to generalized and durable benefits in individuals with chronic stroke and mild to moderate impairments.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arm movements; generalization; long-term retention; reach training; stroke rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26405046      PMCID: PMC4808509          DOI: 10.1177/1545968315606990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  53 in total

1.  Need for speed: better movement quality during faster task performance after stroke.

Authors:  Stacey L DeJong; Sydney Y Schaefer; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: task-related training versus progressive resistive exercise.

Authors:  Gergory T Thielman; Catherine M Dean; A M Gentile
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 3.  Nature, timing, frequency and type of augmented feedback; does it influence motor relearning of the hemiparetic arm after stroke? A systematic review.

Authors:  Birgit I Molier; Edwin H F Van Asseldonk; Hermie J Hermens; Michiel J A Jannink
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Albert's test: a neglected test of perceptual neglect.

Authors:  K J Fullerton; D McSherry; R W Stout
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-22       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Learning, not adaptation, characterizes stroke motor recovery: evidence from kinematic changes induced by robot-assisted therapy in trained and untrained task in the same workspace.

Authors:  L Dipietro; H I Krebs; B T Volpe; J Stein; C Bever; S T Mernoff; S E Fasoli; N Hogan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Translating animal doses of task-specific training to people with chronic stroke in 1-hour therapy sessions: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Rebecca L Birkenmeier; Eliza M Prager; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Consequences of increased neuromotor noise for reaching movements in persons with stroke.

Authors:  Patrick H McCrea; Janice J Eng
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients.

Authors:  A Roby-Brami; A Feydy; M Combeaud; E V Biryukova; B Bussel; M F Levin
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.209

9.  Stroke rehabilitation: are highly structured units more conducive to physical activity than less structured units?

Authors:  F Mackey; L Ada; R Heard; R Adams
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Arm reaching improvements with short-term practice depend on the severity of the motor deficit in stroke.

Authors:  M C Cirstea; A Ptito; M F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  12 in total

1.  The duration of reaching movement is longer than predicted by minimum variance.

Authors:  Chunji Wang; Yupeng Xiao; Etienne Burdet; James Gordon; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Spasticity may obscure motor learning ability after stroke.

Authors:  Sandeep K Subramanian; Anatol G Feldman; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Dissociating Sensorimotor Recovery and Compensation During Exoskeleton Training Following Stroke.

Authors:  Nadir Nibras; Chang Liu; Denis Mottet; Chunji Wang; David Reinkensmeyer; Olivier Remy-Neris; Isabelle Laffont; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Effort, success, and side of lesion determine arm choice in individuals with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Sujin Kim; Cheol E Han; Bokkyu Kim; Carolee J Winstein; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Nonlinear mixed-effects model reveals a distinction between learning and performance in intensive reach training post-stroke.

Authors:  Hyeshin Park; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Measuring Habitual Arm Use Post-stroke With a Bilateral Time-Constrained Reaching Task.

Authors:  Sujin Kim; Hyeshin Park; Cheol E Han; Carolee J Winstein; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 7.  Principles of Neurorehabilitation After Stroke Based on Motor Learning and Brain Plasticity Mechanisms.

Authors:  Martina Maier; Belén Rubio Ballester; Paul F M J Verschure
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-17

8.  A Comparative Study on the Effect of Task Specific Training on Right Versus Left Chronic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Reem M Alwhaibi; Noha F Mahmoud; Hoda M Zakaria; Wanees M Badawy; Mahmoud Y Elzanaty; Walaa M Ragab; Maher S Benjadid; Nisreen N Al Awaji; Hager R Elserougy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Dissociating motor learning from recovery in exoskeleton training post-stroke.

Authors:  Nicolas Schweighofer; Chunji Wang; Denis Mottet; Isabelle Laffont; Karima Bakhti; David J Reinkensmeyer; Olivier Rémy-Néris
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 10.  Computational neurorehabilitation: modeling plasticity and learning to predict recovery.

Authors:  David J Reinkensmeyer; Etienne Burdet; Maura Casadio; John W Krakauer; Gert Kwakkel; Catherine E Lang; Stephan P Swinnen; Nick S Ward; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 5.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.