Literature DB >> 21343334

Dominant-negative features of mutant TP53 in germline carriers have limited impact on cancer outcomes.

Paola Monti1, Chiara Perfumo, Alessandra Bisio, Yari Ciribilli, Paola Menichini, Debora Russo, David M Umbach, Michael A Resnick, Alberto Inga, Gilberto Fronza.   

Abstract

Germline TP53 mutations result in cancer proneness syndromes known as Li-Fraumeni, Li-Fraumeni-like, and nonsyndromic predisposition with or without family history. To explore genotype/phenotype associations, we previously adopted a functional classification of all germline TP53 mutant alleles based on transactivation. Severe deficiency (SD) alleles were associated with more severe cancer proneness syndromes, and a larger number of tumors, compared with partial deficiency (PD) alleles. Because mutant p53 can exert dominant-negative (DN) effects, we addressed the relationship between DN and clinical manifestations. We reasoned that DN effects might be stronger in familial cancer cases associated with germline TP53 mutations, where mutant alleles coexist with the wild-type allele since conception. We examined 104 p53 mutant alleles with single amino acid substitutions described in the IARC germline database for (i) transactivation capability and (ii) capacity to reduce the activity of the wild-type allele (i.e., DN effect) using a quantitative yeast-based assay. The functional classifications of p53 alleles were then related to clinical variables. We confirmed that a classification based on transactivation alone can identify familial cancer cases with more severe clinical features. Classification based on DN effects allowed us to highlight similar associations but did not reveal distinct clinical subclasses of SD alleles, except for a correlation with tumor tissue prevalence. We conclude that in carriers of germline TP53 mutations transactivation-based classification of TP53 alleles appears more important for genotype/phenotype correlations than DN effects and that haplo-insufficiency of the TP53 gene is an important factor in cancer proneness in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21343334      PMCID: PMC3077904          DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Res        ISSN: 1541-7786            Impact factor:   5.852


  36 in total

1.  5-methylcytosine at HpaII sites in p53 is not hypermutable after UVC irradiation.

Authors:  P Monti; A Inga; G Scott; A Aprile; P Campomenosi; P Menichini; L Ottaggio; S Viaggi; A Abbondandolo; P A Burns; G Fronza
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1999-12-16       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Biogenesis of p53 involves cotranslational dimerization of monomers and posttranslational dimerization of dimers. Implications on the dominant negative effect.

Authors:  Chris D Nicholls; Kevin G McLure; Michael A Shields; Patrick W K Lee
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Low rate of TP53 germline mutations in breast cancer/sarcoma families not fulfilling classical criteria for Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Authors:  D G R Evans; J M Birch; M Thorneycroft; G McGown; F Lalloo; J M Varley
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Functional mutants of the sequence-specific transcription factor p53 and implications for master genes of diversity.

Authors:  Michael A Resnick; Alberto Inga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Is p53 haploinsufficient for tumor suppression? Implications for the p53+/- mouse model in carcinogenicity testing.

Authors:  S Venkatachalam; S D Tyner; C R Pickering; S Boley; L Recio; J E French; L A Donehower
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.902

6.  Ultraslow oligomerization equilibria of p53 and its implications.

Authors:  Eviatar Natan; Daniel Hirschberg; Nina Morgner; Carol V Robinson; Alan R Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  p53 mutants can often transactivate promoters containing a p21 but not Bax or PIG3 responsive elements.

Authors:  P Campomenosi; P Monti; A Aprile; A Abbondandolo; T Frebourg; B Gold; T Crook; A Inga; M A Resnick; R Iggo; G Fronza
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-06-14       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Influences of base excision repair defects on the lethality and mutagenicity induced by Me-lex, a sequence-selective N3-adenine methylating agent.

Authors:  Paola Monti; Paola Campomenosi; Yari Ciribilli; Raffaella Iannone; Alberto Inga; Dharini Shah; Gina Scott; Philip A Burns; Paola Menichini; Angelo Abbondandolo; Barry Gold; Gilberto Fronza
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-05-31       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Tumour p53 mutations exhibit promoter selective dominance over wild type p53.

Authors:  Paola Monti; Paola Campomenosi; Yari Ciribilli; Raffaella Iannone; Alberto Inga; Angelo Abbondandolo; Michael A Resnick; Gilberto Fronza
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Understanding the function-structure and function-mutation relationships of p53 tumor suppressor protein by high-resolution missense mutation analysis.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kato; Shuang-Yin Han; Wen Liu; Kazunori Otsuka; Hiroyuki Shibata; Ryunosuke Kanamaru; Chikashi Ishioka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  33 in total

1.  Allele-specific wild-type TP53 expression in the unaffected carrier parent of children with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Buzby; Shirley A Williams; Lana Schaffer; Steven R Head; Diane J Nugent
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2017-01-09

2.  Structure-based predictions broadly link transcription factor mutations to gene expression changes in cancers.

Authors:  Justin Ashworth; Brady Bernard; Sheila Reynolds; Christopher L Plaisier; Ilya Shmulevich; Nitin S Baliga
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Aggregate penetrance of genomic variants for actionable disorders in European and African Americans.

Authors:  Pradeep Natarajan; Nina B Gold; Alexander G Bick; Heather McLaughlin; Peter Kraft; Heidi L Rehm; Gina M Peloso; James G Wilson; Adolfo Correa; Jonathan G Seidman; Christine E Seidman; Sekar Kathiresan; Robert C Green
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Recurrent TP53 missense mutation in cancer patients of Arab descent.

Authors:  Aviad Zick; Luna Kadouri; Sherri Cohen; Michael Frohlinger; Tamar Hamburger; Naama Zvi; Morasha Plaser; Eilat Avital; Shani Breuier; Firase Elian; Azzam Salah; Yael Goldberg; Tamar Peretz
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Association of TP53 and CDKN2A Mutation Profile with Tumor Mutation Burden in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Y Deneka; Yasmine Baca; Ilya G Serebriiskii; Emmanuelle Nicolas; Mitchell I Parker; Theodore T Nguyen; Joanne Xiu; W Michael Korn; Michael J Demeure; Trisha Wise-Draper; Ammar Sukari; Barbara Burtness; Erica A Golemis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 13.801

Review 6.  The rebel angel: mutant p53 as the driving oncogene in breast cancer.

Authors:  Dawid Walerych; Marco Napoli; Licio Collavin; Giannino Del Sal
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Quantitative Analysis of NF-κB Transactivation Specificity Using a Yeast-Based Functional Assay.

Authors:  Vasundhara Sharma; Jennifer J Jordan; Yari Ciribilli; Michael A Resnick; Alessandra Bisio; Alberto Inga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Primed for cancer: Li Fraumeni Syndrome and the pre-cancerous niche.

Authors:  Pan Pantziarka
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2015-05-21

9.  Identification of new p53 target microRNAs by bioinformatics and functional analysis.

Authors:  Alessandra Bisio; Veronica De Sanctis; Valerio Del Vescovo; Michela A Denti; Anil G Jegga; Alberto Inga; Yari Ciribilli
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Transactivation specificity is conserved among p53 family proteins and depends on a response element sequence code.

Authors:  Yari Ciribilli; Paola Monti; Alessandra Bisio; H Thien Nguyen; Abdul S Ethayathulla; Ana Ramos; Giorgia Foggetti; Paola Menichini; Daniel Menendez; Michael A Resnick; Hector Viadiu; Gilberto Fronza; Alberto Inga
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.