Literature DB >> 25378323

Structure-based predictions broadly link transcription factor mutations to gene expression changes in cancers.

Justin Ashworth1, Brady Bernard2, Sheila Reynolds3, Christopher L Plaisier3, Ilya Shmulevich3, Nitin S Baliga3.   

Abstract

Thousands of unique mutations in transcription factors (TFs) arise in cancers, and the functional and biological roles of relatively few of these have been characterized. Here, we used structure-based methods developed specifically for DNA-binding proteins to systematically predict the consequences of mutations in several TFs that are frequently mutated in cancers. The explicit consideration of protein-DNA interactions was crucial to explain the roles and prevalence of mutations in TP53 and RUNX1 in cancers, and resulted in a higher specificity of detection for known p53-regulated genes among genetic associations between TP53 genotypes and genome-wide expression in The Cancer Genome Atlas, compared to existing methods of mutation assessment. Biophysical predictions also indicated that the relative prevalence of TP53 missense mutations in cancer is proportional to their thermodynamic impacts on protein stability and DNA binding, which is consistent with the selection for the loss of p53 transcriptional function in cancers. Structure and thermodynamics-based predictions of the impacts of missense mutations that focus on specific molecular functions may be increasingly useful for the precise and large-scale inference of aberrant molecular phenotypes in cancer and other complex diseases.
© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25378323      PMCID: PMC4245936          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku1031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  74 in total

1.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-05-01

2.  A simple physical model for the prediction and design of protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  James J Havranek; Carlos M Duarte; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Crystal structure of a tyrosine phosphorylated STAT-1 dimer bound to DNA.

Authors:  X Chen; U Vinkemeier; Y Zhao; D Jeruzalmi; J E Darnell; J Kuriyan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-05-29       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences.

Authors:  R L Dunbrack; F E Cohen
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Thermodynamic stability of wild-type and mutant p53 core domain.

Authors:  A N Bullock; J Henckel; B S DeDecker; C M Johnson; P V Nikolova; M R Proctor; D P Lane; A R Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Semirational design of active tumor suppressor p53 DNA binding domain with enhanced stability.

Authors:  P V Nikolova; J Henckel; D P Lane; A R Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The MDM2 gene amplification database.

Authors:  J Momand; D Jung; S Wilczynski; J Niland
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) database and website.

Authors:  S Bamford; E Dawson; S Forbes; J Clements; R Pettett; A Dogan; A Flanagan; J Teague; P A Futreal; M R Stratton; R Wooster
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Structure-energy-based predictions and network modelling of RASopathy and cancer missense mutations.

Authors:  Christina Kiel; Luis Serrano
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  A framework for the interpretation of de novo mutation in human disease.

Authors:  Kaitlin E Samocha; Elise B Robinson; Stephan J Sanders; Christine Stevens; Aniko Sabo; Lauren M McGrath; Jack A Kosmicki; Karola Rehnström; Swapan Mallick; Andrew Kirby; Dennis P Wall; Daniel G MacArthur; Stacey B Gabriel; Mark DePristo; Shaun M Purcell; Aarno Palotie; Eric Boerwinkle; Joseph D Buxbaum; Edwin H Cook; Richard A Gibbs; Gerard D Schellenberg; James S Sutcliffe; Bernie Devlin; Kathryn Roeder; Benjamin M Neale; Mark J Daly
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  4 in total

1.  Rare variants implicate NMDA receptor signaling and cerebellar gene networks in risk for bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Naushaba Hasin; Lace M Riggs; Tatyana Shekhtman; Justin Ashworth; Robert Lease; Rediet T Oshone; Elizabeth M Humphries; Judith A Badner; Pippa A Thomson; David C Glahn; David W Craig; Howard J Edenberg; Elliot S Gershon; Francis J McMahon; John I Nurnberger; Peter P Zandi; John R Kelsoe; Jared C Roach; Todd D Gould; Seth A Ament
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 15.992

2.  A trans-acting Variant within the Transcription Factor RIM101 Interacts with Genetic Background to Determine its Regulatory Capacity.

Authors:  Timothy Read; Phillip A Richmond; Robin D Dowell
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 5.917

3.  Comprehensive assessment of TP53 loss of function using multiple combinatorial mutagenesis libraries.

Authors:  Vincent Carbonnier; Bernard Leroy; Shai Rosenberg; Thierry Soussi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Phosphorylation of human TRM9L integrates multiple stress-signaling pathways for tumor growth suppression.

Authors:  Chen Gu; Jillian Ramos; Ulrike Begley; Peter C Dedon; Dragony Fu; Thomas J Begley
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 14.136

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.