Literature DB >> 11805092

Biogenesis of p53 involves cotranslational dimerization of monomers and posttranslational dimerization of dimers. Implications on the dominant negative effect.

Chris D Nicholls1, Kevin G McLure, Michael A Shields, Patrick W K Lee.   

Abstract

Precisely how mutant p53 exerts a dominant negative effect over wild type p53 has been an enigma. To understand how wild type and mutant p53 form hetero-oligomers, we studied p53 biogenesis in vitro. We show here that p53 dimers are formed cotranslationally (on the polysome), whereas tetramers are formed posttranslationally (by the dimerization of dimers in solution). Coexpression of wild type and mutant p53 therefore results in 50% of the p53 generated being heterotetramers comprised of a single species: wild type dimer/mutant dimer. Using hot spot mutants of p53 and a variety of natural target sites, we show that all wild type/mutant heterotetramers manifest impaired DNA binding activity. This impairment is not due to the mutant dimeric subunit inhibiting association of the complex with DNA but rather due to the lack of significant contribution (positive cooperativity) from the mutant partner. For all heterotetramers, bias in binding is particularly pronounced against those sequences in genes responsible for apoptosis rather than cell growth arrest. These results explain the molecular basis of p53 dominant negative effect and suggest a functional role in the regulation of p53 tetramerization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11805092     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M108815200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  55 in total

1.  How many mutant p53 molecules are needed to inactivate a tetramer?

Authors:  Wan Mui Chan; Wai Yi Siu; Anita Lau; Randy Y C Poon
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Molecular basis for dyneinopathies reveals insight into dynein regulation and dysfunction.

Authors:  Matthew G Marzo; Jacqueline M Griswold; Kristina M Ruff; Rachel E Buchmeier; Colby P Fees; Steven M Markus
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Low-level p53 expression changes transactivation rules and reveals superactivating sequences.

Authors:  Jennifer J Jordan; Daniel Menendez; Jenia Sharav; Itai Beno; Karin Rosenthal; Michael A Resnick; Tali E Haran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Pathological unfoldomics of uncontrolled chaos: intrinsically disordered proteins and human diseases.

Authors:  Vladimir N Uversky; Vrushank Davé; Lilia M Iakoucheva; Prerna Malaney; Steven J Metallo; Ravi Ramesh Pathak; Andreas C Joerger
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Dominant-negative features of mutant TP53 in germline carriers have limited impact on cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Paola Monti; Chiara Perfumo; Alessandra Bisio; Yari Ciribilli; Paola Menichini; Debora Russo; David M Umbach; Michael A Resnick; Alberto Inga; Gilberto Fronza
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 6.  Unraveling co-translational protein folding: Concepts and methods.

Authors:  Anton A Komar
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.608

7.  Ultraslow oligomerization equilibria of p53 and its implications.

Authors:  Eviatar Natan; Daniel Hirschberg; Nina Morgner; Carol V Robinson; Alan R Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  p53 oligomerization status modulates cell fate decisions between growth, arrest and apoptosis.

Authors:  Nicholas W Fischer; Aaron Prodeus; David Malkin; Jean Gariépy
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  The role of dimerisation and nuclear transport in the Hes1 gene regulatory network.

Authors:  Marc Sturrock; Andreas Hellander; Sahar Aldakheel; Linda Petzold; Mark A J Chaplain
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  Mechanistic differences in the transcriptional activation of p53 by 14-3-3 isoforms.

Authors:  Sridharan Rajagopalan; Robert S Sade; Fiona M Townsley; Alan R Fersht
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.