| Literature DB >> 21342504 |
Esteban Martínez-García1, Belén Calles, Miguel Arévalo-Rodríguez, Víctor de Lorenzo.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since publication in 1977 of plasmid pBR322, many breakthroughs in Biology have depended on increasingly sophisticated vector platforms for analysis and engineering of given bacterial strains. Although restriction sites impose a certain format in the procedures for assembling cloned genes, every attempt thus far to standardize vector architecture and nomenclature has ended up in failure. While this state of affairs may still be tolerable for traditional one-at-a-time studies of single genes, the onset of systems and synthetic biology calls for a simplification--along with an optimization--of the currently unwieldy pool of genetic tools.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21342504 PMCID: PMC3056738 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-38
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Figure 1pBAM1 plasmid map. Functional elements of the plasmid include relevant restriction sites, antibiotic markers (Ap, ampicillin, Km, kanamycin), transposase (tnpA), origin of replication (R6K), the origin of transfer region (oriT), mosaic element O (ME-O), and mosaic element I (ME-I), as shown.
Figure 2Structural organization of standard mini-transposon modules. (A) Mini-Tn5 Km. Details of relevant restriction enzymes within the module are shown. The fusion of ME-I and ME-O sequences with the plasmid DNA backbone generated PvuII restriction sites that bracket the mobile segment. The red arrow indicates the position of the promoter of the Km resistance gene. MCS: multiple-cloning-site. (B) mini-Tn5GFPKm. Schematic representation of the main features of this version of the mini-transposon engineered in the pBAM1 backbone, containing the GFP gene lacking leading sequences and thus able to produce protein fusions upon chromosomal insertions in the right direction and frame. The Km resistance cassette is identical to that of the mini-Tn5Km of pBAM1.
Transposition frequencies of pBAM1
| Resistance frequency | Analyses of exconjugants | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mating | Not detectable | 1.8 ± 0.53 × 10-3 | 200 | 200 | 0 |
| Electroporation | Not detectable | 1.02 ± 0.38 × 10-7 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
a The pBAM1 plasmid was introduced into recipient cells either by five-hour tri-parental mating or by electroporation, letting the cells to recover after the electro-pulse in LB at 30°C for one hour. Electroporation figures are the average of the frequencies obtained using 100 ng (1.1 ± 0.5 × 10-7) and 500 ng (0.89 ± 0.2 × 10-7) of plasmid DNA.
b Number of P. putida KT2440 colonies that acquire the marker resistance spontaneously, without mating or electroporation.
c Total number of cells that acquired the mini-transposon, as measured by growth in kanamycin normalized to the total 3 × 107 donor cells. The 5 h mating frequency was averaged using a total of 16 independent experiments. Electroporation was referred to a final cell concentration of 6 × 1010 electrocompetent cells and the frequency determined with 6 independent experiments.
d Number of independent colonies that were screened for the presence of the mini-transposon marker (kanamycin) and for the loss of the plasmid backbone marker (ampicillin).
e Number of kanamycin resistant colonies.
f Colonies that are both resistance to kanamycin and ampicillin, meaning co-integration of the pBAM1 plasmid into their genome.
Primers used in this study
| Name | Sequence 5' → 3' | Usage | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARB6 | GGCACGCGTCGACTAGTACNNNNNNNNNNACGCC | PCR round 1 | [ |
| ARB2 | GGCACGCGTCGACTAGTAC | PCR round 2 | [ |
| ME-O-extF | CGGTTTACAAGCATAACTAGTGCGGC | PCR round 1 | This work |
| ME-O-intF | AGAGGATCCCCGGGTACCGAGCTCG | PCR round 2/sequencing | This work |
| ME-I-extR | CTCGTTTCACGCTGAATATGGCTC | PCR round 1 | This work |
| ME-I-intR | CAGTTTTATTGTTCATGATGATATA | PCR round 2/sequencing | This work |
| GFP-extR | GGGTAAGTTTTCCGTATGTTGCATC | PCR round 1 | This work |
| GFP-intR | GCCCATTAACATCACCATCTAATTC | PCR round 2/sequencing | This work |
Figure 3Testing mini-transposon insertions in . (A) Representation of the reporter module born by the P. putida MAD1 strain. Pu is induced by XylR in the presence of m-xylene vapours. (B) Schematic representation and approximate location of mini-Tn5Km insertions within xylR and lacZ in P. putida MAD1. (C) The reference condition is that of the clones of the non-mutagenized strain exposed to m-xylene and grown on a plate with X-gal for several days, which results in an intense blue colour exacerbated in the centre of the colony. (D) The other pictures represent the variety of the blue/white patterns obtained throughout the P. putida MAD1 mutagenesis experiment. The pictures were obtained with a Leica MZ FLIII stereomicroscope with an Olympus DP70 camera. See Table S3 of Additional File 1 for more details.
Bacteria and plasmids
| Strains | Description/relevant characteristics | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| CC118λ | Δ( | [ |
| HB101 | SmR
, | [ |
| KT2440 | mt-2 derivative cured of the TOL plasmid pWW0 | [ |
| MAD1 | KT2440 RifR
, TelR, | [ |
| pRK600 | CmR; | [ |
| pBAM1 | KmR ApR; | This work |
| pBAM1-GFP | KmR ApR; | This work |
Rif: Rifampicin; Tel: Tellurite.
Figure 4Subcellular localization of high-fluorescence GFP fusions generated by mutagenesis of . Cultures of the cells under examination were grown until stationary phase in LB medium and prepared for epifluorescence microscopy as explained in Materials and Methods. The upper panel shows examples of GFP fused to cytosolic proteins, as indicated, whereas in lower panel contains GFP fusions in three different membrane-associated proteins. Table S4 of Additional File 1 provides more details of the GFP fusions generated.