| Literature DB >> 21339968 |
R Linnakoski1, Z W de Beer, J Ahtiainen, E Sidorov, P Niemelä, A Pappinen, M J Wingfield.
Abstract
The timber and pulp industries of Finland rely heavily on importations from Russia as source of raw timber. These imports raise the risk of accidentally importing forest pests and pathogens, especially bark beetles and their associated fungi, into Finland. Although ophiostomatoid fungi have previously been reported from Finland and Russia, the risks of accidentally moving these fungi has prompted a first survey to compare the diversity of conifer-infesting bark beetles and associated fungi from boreal forests on both sides of the Finnish-Russian border. The aim of the present study was to identify and characterise Ophiostoma species isolated in association with 11 bark beetle species infesting Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies during this survey in the eastern parts of Finland and neighbouring Russia. Fungal isolates were grouped based on morphology and representatives of each morphological group were subjected to DNA sequence comparisons of the internal transcribed spaced region (ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2) and β-tubulin gene region. A total of 15 species of Ophiostoma were identified, including seven known species, five new species, and three species for which the identity remains uncertain. In the O. piceae-complex we identified O. canum, O. floccosum, O. karelicum and O. rachisporum sp. nov., and related to these, some isolates belonging to the European clade of O. minus in the O. minus-complex. Ophiostoma bicolor and O. fuscum sp. nov. were identified in the O. ips-complex, while O. ainoae, O. brunneo-ciliatum, O. tapionis sp. nov. and O. pallidulum sp. nov. were shown to group close to, but not in a strict monophyletic lineage with species of the O. ips-complex. Together with a single O. abietinum-like isolate, the only species that grouped close to the Sporothrix schenckii- O. stenoceras complex, was O. saponiodorum sp. nov.Entities:
Keywords: Ophiostoma; Ophiostomatales; bark beetle; insect-fungus relationship; symbiosis
Year: 2010 PMID: 21339968 PMCID: PMC3028507 DOI: 10.3767/003158510X550845
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Persoonia ISSN: 0031-5850 Impact factor: 11.051
Ophiostoma spp. previously reported from different beetles and/or host trees in Finland (F) and Russia (R). Identifications in all these studies were based on morphology, and only those marked with * included DNA sequence comparisons.
| Fungus | Beetle | Host tree | Origin | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | ||||
| R | ||||
| – | R | |||
| F | ||||
| F | ||||
| R | ||||
| F | ||||
| R | ||||
| F | ||||
| F | ||||
| R | ||||
| R | ||||
| – | R | |||
| – | R | |||
| – | R | |||
| R | ||||
| R | ||||
| R | ||||
| F, R | ||||
| – | R | |||
| – | R | |||
| – | R | |||
| R | ||||
| R | ||||
| – | R | |||
| R | ||||
| R | ||||
| – | – | R | ||
| Scolytid beetles | R | |||
| F | ||||
| F | ||||
| F | ||||
| R | ||||
| – | – | F, R | ||
| – | R | |||
| F | ||||
| F | ||||
| F | ||||
| R | ||||
| F | ||||
| – | – | R | ||
| – | R | |||
| R | ||||
| F | ||||
| R | ||||
| – | R | |||
| – | R | |||
| – | – | R | ||
| – | R | |||
| – | R | |||
| R | ||||
| F | ||||
| F | ||||
| – | R | |||
| – | – | R | ||
| – | R | |||
| – | R | |||
| Scolytid beetles | R | |||
| – | R | |||
| – | R | |||
| R |
Fungal isolates obtained from different bark beetle species infesting pine and spruce in Russia and Finland, as well as isolates of known species included for reference purposes. Accession numbers in bold type are for sequences obtained in the present study.
| Species identity | Lineage | Isolate numbers | Herbarium KUO | Origin | Host | Insect vector | Collector | GenBank no. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBS | CMW | VTT/JCM | ITS | β-tubulin | |||||||
| H | – | 23123 | – | – | Ohtama, Russia | Ahtiainen | |||||
| – | 23167 | – | – | Lisino-Corpus, Russia | Linnakoski | – | |||||
| K | – | 23175 | – | – | Ohtama, Russia | Ahtiainen | – | ||||
| – | 23179 | – | – | Ohtama, Russia | Ahtiainen | ||||||
| – | 23189 | – | – | Ohtama, Russia | Ahtiainen | ||||||
| G | – | 23115 | – | – | Lisino-Corpus, Russia | Linnakoski | |||||
| 128127 | 23143 | – | – | Ohtama, Russia | Ahtiainen | – | |||||
| – | 23146 | – | – | Ohtama, Russia | Ahtiainen | – | |||||
| – | 23153 | – | – | Ohtama, Russia | Ahtiainen | – | |||||
| C1 | – | 23229 | – | – | Punkaharju, Finland | de Beer | – | ||||
| – | 23230 | – | – | Punkaharju, Finland | de Beer | – | |||||
| – | 23241 | – | – | Punkaharju, Finland | de Beer | – | |||||
| – | 23253 | – | – | Lisino-Corpus, Russia | Linnakoski | – | |||||
| – | 23254 | – | – | Lisino-Corpus, Russia | Linnakoski | – | |||||
| – | 23260 | – | – | Lisino-Corpus, Russia | Linnakoski | ||||||
| – | 23261 | – | – | Lisino-Corpus, Russia | Linnakoski | – | |||||
| – | 28158 | – | – | Lisino-Corpus, Russia | Linnakoski | – | |||||
| C2 | 127077 | 34938 | D-101402 | – | Volosovo, Russia | Sidorov | – | ||||
| – | 34939 | D-101403 | – | Volosovo, Russia | Sidorov | – | |||||
| – | 23208 | D-101404 | – | Punkaharju, Finland | de Beer | ||||||
| – | 23219 | – | – | Punkaharju, Finland | Linnakoski | – | |||||
| – | 23255 | – | – | Lisino-Corpus, Russia | Linnakoski | – | |||||
| – | 23259 | D-101405 | – | Lisino-Corpus, Russia | Linnakoski | – | |||||
| E | – | 23287 | – | – | Lisino-Corpus, Russia | Linnakoski | |||||
| – | 23288 | – | – | Lisino-Corpus, Russia | Linnakoski | – | |||||
| J | 128124 | 23195 | D-101410 | 021876 | Lisino-Corpus, Russia | Linnakoski | – | ||||
| – | 23196 | D-101411 | 021877 | Pyhäselkä, Finland | de Beer | ||||||
| – | 28019 | D-101412 | 021878 | Kivennapa, Russia | Linnakoski | ||||||
| A | 127073 | 34935 | – | – | Punkaharju, Finland | de Beer | |||||
| 127074 | 34936 | – | – | Punkaharju, Finland | de Beer | ||||||
| – | 23244 | – | – | Punkaharju, Finland | de Beer | – | |||||
| – | 34937 | – | – | Kivennapa, Russia | Linnakoski | – | |||||
| D | – | 27992 | – | – | Kivennapa, Russia | Linnakoski | – | ||||
| – | 28117 | – | – | Uuksujärvi, Russia | Linnakoski | ||||||
| – | 28154 | – | – | Punkaharju, Finland | Linnakoski | – | |||||
| – | 28171 | – | – | Lisino-Corpus, Russia | Linnakoski | – | |||||
| L | 127075 | 34941 | D-101413 | – | Punkaharju, Finland | de Beer | – | ||||
| 128118 | 23278 | D-101414 | 021879 | Punkaharju, Finland | de Beer | ||||||
| 128125 | 23279 | D-101415 | 021880 | Punkaharju, Finland | de Beer | – | |||||
| 127076 | 23280 | D-101416 | 021881 | Punkaharju, Finland | de Beer | – | – | ||||
| B | – | 23271 | – | – | Ilomantsi, Finland | de Beer | – | ||||
| 128119 | 23272 | D-101400 | 021869 | Punkaharju, Finland | de Beer | ||||||
| – | 23273 | – | 021871 | Punkaharju, Finland | Linnakoski | – | – | ||||
| 128123 | 23274 | D-101401 | 021870 | Punkaharju, Finland | de Beer | – | |||||
| – | 28021 | – | – | Kivennapa, Russia | Linnakoski | ||||||
| M | 127081 | 34942 | D-101417 | 021883 | Pyhäselkä, Finland | de Beer | – | – | |||
| 127080 | 34943 | D-101418 | 021885 | Pyhäselkä, Finland | de Beer | – | |||||
| 127079 | 34944 | D-101419 | 021887 | Pyhäselkä, Finland | de Beer | – | |||||
| – | 28135 | – | – | Roikonkoski, Russia | Linnakoski | – | |||||
| 127078 | 34945 | D-101420 | 021884 | Pyhäselkä, Finland | de Beer | ||||||
| 128126 | 30883 | D-101421 | 021886 | Pyhäselkä, Finland | de Beer | – | |||||
| F | 128120 | 23265 | D-101406 | 021872 | Punkaharju, Finland | de Beer | – | ||||
| 128122 | 23266 | D-101407 | 021873 | Punkaharju, Finland | Linnakoski | ||||||
| – | 23263 | – | 021874 | Punkaharju, Finland | Linnakoski | – | |||||
| – | 34940 | – | – | Punkaharju, Finland | Linnakoski | – | |||||
| – | 23264 | – | – | Punkaharju, Finland | Linnakoski | – | |||||
| 128121 | 23269 | D-101408 | 021875 | Lisino-Corpus, Russia | Linnakoski | ||||||
| I | – | 23194 | D-101409 | – | Punkaharju, Finland | de Beer | |||||
| N | – | 28030 | – | – | Kivennapa, Russia | Linnakoski | |||||
| 125.89 | 22310 | – | – | Mexico | Marmolejo | AF484453 | |||||
| 205.83 | 1037 | – | – | Norway | Solheim | – | |||||
| 118672 | 1903 | – | – | Norway | – | Olsen | |||||
| – | 5031 | – | – | Austria | Kirisits | – | |||||
| – | – | JCM 12500 | – | Japan | Yamaoka | – | |||||
| – | – | JCM 12501 | – | Japan | Yamaoka | AB200423 | |||||
| – | 5212 | – | – | Scotland | – | Kirisits | |||||
| – | 5214 | – | – | Scotland | – | Kirisits | |||||
| 133.51 | – | – | – | Sweden | – | Mathiesen | |||||
| 138.50 | 1096 | – | – | Netherlands | – | Limber | AF484451 | ||||
| 434.77 | 456 | – | – | USA | pulpwood chips | – | Eslyn | AY194509 | |||
1CBS: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CMW: Culture Collection of the Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; VTT: Culture Collection of the Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland; JCM: Japan Collection of Micro-organisms, Saitama, Japan. KUO: Kuopio Museum of Natural History, Kuopio, Finland.
2From the study of de Beer et al. (2003a); 3 Chung et al. (2006); and 4 Jacobs et al. (2003).
aIsolates used in growth studies; b Isolates used in morphological descriptions.
TEx-type isolates; A Authentic isolates from the original collections.
Fig. 1a. Part of a typical boreal forest in Finland; b. exposed galleries of Hylurgops palliatus on Pinus sylvestris; c. trapping logs in Ilomantsi, Finland; d. galleries of Trypodendron lineatum on Picea abies; e. galleries of Tomicus minor on P. sylvestris.
Fig. 2Phylogram obtained from ML analyses of the ITS region. Novel sequences obtained in this study are printed in bold type. ML bootstrap support values (1 000 replicates) (normal type) and MP Jackknife values (10 000 replicates) (bold type) above 75 % are indicated at the nodes. Posterior probabilities (above 90 %) obtained from BI are indicated by bold lines at the relevant branching points. * = bootstrap values lower than 75 %. T = ex-type isolates. Scale bar = total nucleotide difference between taxa. Green = known species; blue = new species; yellow = species of uncertain identity.
Fig. 3Phylogram obtained from ML analyses of the β-tubulin gene of the O. piceae- and O. minus complexes. Novel sequences obtained in this study are printed in bold type. ML bootstrap support values (1 000 replicates) (normal type) and MP Jackknife values (10 000 replicates) (bold type) above 75 % are indicated at the nodes. Posterior probabilities (above 90 %) obtained from BI are indicated by bold lines at the relevant branching points. * = bootstrap values lower than 75 %. T = ex-type isolates. Scale bar = total nucleotide difference between taxa. Green = known species; blue = new species; yellow = species of uncertain identity.
Fig. 4Phylogram obtained from ML analyses of the β-tubulin gene of species in the O. ips-complex s.l. Novel sequences obtained in this study are printed in bold type. ML bootstrap support values (1 000 replicates) (normal type) and MP Jackknife values (10 000 replicates) (bold type) above 75 % are indicated at the nodes. Posterior probabilities (above 90 %) obtained from BI are indicated by bold lines at the relevant branching points. * = bootstrap values lower than 75 %. T = ex-type isolates. Scale bar = total nucleotide difference between taxa. Green = known species; blue = new species.
Fig. 5Phylogram obtained from ML analyses of the β-tubulin gene of species in the S. schenckii-O. stenoceras-complex. Novel of sequences obtained in this study are printed in bold type. ML bootstrap support values (1 000 replicates) (normal type) and MP Jackknife values (10 000 replicates) (bold type) above 75 % are indicated at the nodes. Posterior probabilities (above 90 %) obtained from BI are indicated by bold lines at the relevant branching points. * = bootstrap values lower than 75 %. T = ex-type isolates. Scale bar = total nucleotide difference between taxa. Blue = new species; yellow = species of uncertain identity.
Number of Ophiostoma isolates obtained from 11 bark beetle species and their galleries during the course of this study.
| Beetle species* → | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Total | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b | g | b | g | b | g | b | g | b | g | b | g | b | g | b | g | b | g | b | g | b | g | ||
| Fungus species ↓ | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 100 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 21 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total isolates | 28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 29 | 0 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 41 | 0 | 174 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| | 26 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 63 |
| | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
| | 50 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 71 |
| | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 21 | 65 |
| | 5 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 14 | 18 | 15 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 24 | 30 | 7 | 3 | 220 |
| | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 |
| | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 5 | 11 | 51 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total isolates | 109 | 54 | 5 | 1 | 26 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 23 | 38 | 20 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 11 | 29 | 50 | 30 | 40 | 543 |
* Bark beetle species: 1 = Ips typographus; 2 = Ips sp.; 3 = Dryocoetes autographus; 4 = Hylastes brunneus; 5 = Hylurgops palliatus; 6 = Pityogenes chalcographus; 7 = Pityogenes sp.; 8 = Trypodendron lineatum; 9 = Ips sexdentatus; 10 = Tomicus piniperda; 11 = Tomicus minor.
b = beetles; g = galleries.
Fig. 6Morphological characters of teleomorph and anamorph structures of Ophiostoma rachisporum sp. nov. a. Ascoma; b. scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of ascospores; c. ascospores; d. fourteen day old culture on malt extract agar (MEA); e. Pesotum anamorph; f. SEM of conidia; g. conidia. — Scale bars: a, e = 100 μm; b, f = 1 μm; c, g = 10 μm.
Fig. 7Morphological characters of anamorph structures of Ophiostoma tapionis sp. nov. a. Hyalorhinocladiella anamorph; b. conidia; c. SEM of conidia; d. fourteen day old culture on MEA. — Scale bars: a = 100 μm; b = 10 μm; c = 3 μm.
Fig. 8Morphological characters of anamorph structures of Ophiostoma fuscum sp. nov. a. Pesotum-like anamorph; b. conidia; c. Hyalorhinocladiella anamorph; d. fourteen day old culture on MEA. — Scale bars: a = 100 μm; b, c = 10 μm.
Fig. 9Morphological characters of Ophiostoma pallidulum sp. nov. anamorph structures. a. Hyalorhinocladiella anamorph; b. SEM of conidiogenous cells of Hyalorhinocladiella anamorph; c. SEM of conidia; d. fourteen day old culture on MEA. — Scale bars: a = 10 μm; b = 3 μm, c = 2 μm.
Fig. 10Morphological characters of Ophiostoma saponiodorum sp. nov. anamorph and teleomorph structures. a. Ascoma; b. tip of neck with ascospores; c. ascospores; d. fourteen day old culture on MEA; e. Pesotum-like anamorph; f. conidia; g. SEM of conidia; h. conidiogenous cell and conidia of Hyalorhinocladiella-like anamorph. — Scale bars: a, e = 100 μm; b, c, f, h = 10 μm; g = 2 μm.