Literature DB >> 21336508

Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacers in patients with compressive cervical myelopathy.

Atsushi Kimura1, Atsushi Seichi, Hirokazu Inoue, Yuichi Hoshino.   

Abstract

No previous studies have reported 10-year follow-up results for double-door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite (HA) spacers. The purpose of this study was therefore to explore the long-term results of double-door laminoplasty using HA spacers and to determine if non-union or breakage of HA spacers is related to restenosis of the enlarged cervical canal. The study group consisted of 68 patients with a minimum of 10 years of follow-up after double-door laminoplasty using HA spacers. The average postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score improved significantly after surgery and was maintained until the final follow-up. The average range of motion decreased by 42.6% in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and 65.8% in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). The enlarged cervical canal area was preserved almost until the final follow-up. The average non-union rates of HA spacers were 21% in CSM and 17% in OPLL, and the average breakage rates were 24 in CSM and 21% in OPLL at the final follow-up. Although non-union and breakage of HA spacers were common, neither of these factors were correlated with restenosis of the enlarged cervical canal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21336508      PMCID: PMC3175910          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1724-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  17 in total

1.  Laminoplasty using Twinfix suture anchors to maintain cervical canal expansion.

Authors:  Hai-Long Yu; Liang-Bi Xiang; Jun Liu; Yu Chen; Ming Yu; Yan Cao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical results after cervical laminoplasty: differences due to the duration of wearing a cervical collar.

Authors:  Haku Iizuka; Yumi Nakagawa; Atsushi Shimegi; Satoshi Tsutsumi; Naohumi Toda; Kenji Takagishi; Takachika Shimizu
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-12

3.  Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy--average 14-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Chiba; Yuto Ogawa; Ken Ishii; Hironari Takaishi; Masaya Nakamura; Hirofumi Maruiwa; Morio Matsumoto; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A novel technique for laminoplasty augmentation of spinal canal area using titanium miniplate stabilization: a computerized morphometric analysis.

Authors:  N Tsuzuki
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Expansive laminoplasty as a method for managing cervical multilevel spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Martin-Benlloch; Jose Ignacio Maruenda-Paulino; Amariel Barra-Pla; Manuel Laguia-Garzaran
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy: surgical technique and neurophysiological monitoring.

Authors:  R Roselli; A Pompucci; F Formica; D Restuccia; V Di Lazzaro; M Valeriani; M Scerrati
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Long-term results of expansive laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: more than 10 years follow up.

Authors:  Motoki Iwasaki; Yoshiharu Kawaguchi; Tomoatsu Kimura; Kazuo Yonenobu
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  How does the ossification area of the posterior longitudinal ligament progress after cervical laminoplasty?

Authors:  Takeshi Hori; Yoshiharu Kawaguchi; Tomoatsu Kimura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Minimum 10-year followup after en bloc cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Kawaguchi; Masahiko Kanamori; Hirokazu Ishihara; Kazuo Ohmori; Hiroshi Nakamura; Tomoatsu Kimura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Spinous process-splitting laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spinous process spacer.

Authors:  K Nakano; S Harata; F Suetsuna; T Araki; J Itoh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  17 in total

1.  Clinical results of and patient satisfaction with cervical laminoplasty for considerable cord compression with only slight myelopathy.

Authors:  Masashi Neo; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Mitsuru Takemoto; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Smith-Robinson procedure with and without Caspar plating as a treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A 26-year follow-up of 23 patients.

Authors:  Benedikt W Burkhardt; Moritz Brielmaier; Karsten Schwerdtfeger; Salam Sharif; Joachim M Oertel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [All levels miniplate fixation and a modified hybrid fixation method in expansive open-door cervical laminoplasty: a retrospective comparative study].

Authors:  Z C Yang; C X Liu; Y Lin; W H Hu; W J Chen; F Li; H Zeng
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-02-18

4.  Ultrasonographic quantification of spinal cord and dural pulsations during cervical laminoplasty in patients with compressive myelopathy.

Authors:  Atsushi Kimura; Atsushi Seichi; Hirokazu Inoue; Teruaki Endo; Michiyoshi Sato; Takahiro Higashi; Yuichi Hoshino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Postoperative neck symptoms of posterior approach for cervical compressive myelopathy: Expansive open-door laminoplasty vs. segmental partial laminectomy.

Authors:  Koji Otani; Masumi Iwabuchi; Katsuhiko Sato; Shinichi Konno; Shinichi Kikuchi
Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci       Date:  2018-05-18

6.  Segmental anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion with preservation of middle vertebrae in the surgical management of 4-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Zhenggang Guo; Shuxun Hou; Yantao Zhao; Hongbin Zhong; Shunzhi Yu; Tiesheng Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The relationship between laminoplasty opening angle and increased sagittal canal diameter and the prediction of spinal canal expansion following double-door cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Zhen-Fang Gu; Ai-Li Zhang; Yong Shen; Wen-Yuan Ding; Feng Li; Xian-Ze Sun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Midline-Splitting Open Door Laminoplasty Using Hydroxyapatite Spacers : Comparison between Two Different Shaped Spacers.

Authors:  Jin Hoon Park; Sang Ryong Jeon
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-07-31

Review 9.  Cervical Laminoplasty: The History and the Future.

Authors:  Ryu Kurokawa; Phyo Kim
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Preoperative predictors of patient satisfaction with outcome after cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Atsushi Kimura; Teruaki Endo; Hirokazu Inoue; Atsushi Seichi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2014-01-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.