Literature DB >> 21336236

Lengthening of dual growing rods and the law of diminishing returns.

Wudbhav N Sankar1, David L Skaggs, Muharrem Yazici, Charles E Johnston, Suken A Shah, Pooya Javidan, Rishi V Kadakia, Thomas F Day, Behrooz A Akbarnia.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of repeated surgical lengthenings and time on spinal growth and Cobb angle in children with early onset scoliosis and dual growing rods. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have established the effectiveness of dual growing rods for controlling spinal deformity and promoting spinal "growth." Although anecdotal experience suggests that the effectiveness of repeated lengthenings decreases over time, this has not been previously studied.
METHODS: Medical records from five different centers were reviewed to identify children treated with dual growing rods for early onset scoliosis who had a minimum of 2-year follow-up and at least three lengthening procedures. Initial radiographs, postimplantation radiographs, and radiographs from before and after each lengthening were measured for T1-S1 distance and Cobb angle. Linear regression and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients from five centers met the inclusion criteria. The average age of our patients was 5.7 years (range 1.7-8.9 years); mean follow-up was 3.3 years (range 2-7 years). The average interval between lengthenings was 6.8 months. Cobb angle decreased from a mean value of 74° preoperatively to 36° after the primary implantation and did not change significantly with repeated lengthenings (P = 0.96). After initial implantation, the average annual T1-S1 gain was 1.76 ± 0.71 cm/year. The T1-S1 gain after a given lengthening, however, decreased significantly with repeated lengthenings (P = 0.007). When the effect of time was considered, there was also a significant decrease in T1-S1 gain over time (P = 0.014).
CONCLUSION: There seems to be a "law of diminishing returns" with repeated lengthenings of dual growing rods. Repeated lengthenings still result in a net T1-S1 increase; however, this gain tends to decrease with each subsequent lengthening and over time. This phenomenon may be due to autofusion of the spine from prolonged immobilization by a rigid device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21336236     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318214d78f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  43 in total

1.  H3S2 (3 hooks, 2 screws) construct: a simple growing rod technique for early onset scoliosis.

Authors:  Lotfi Miladi; Alexandre Journe; Maryline Mousny
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Treatment of early onset scoliosis : How far can we go?].

Authors:  D Studer; C C Hasler; A Schulze
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Magnetically controlled growing rods in early onset scoliosis: radiological results, outcome, and complications in a series of 22 patients.

Authors:  Peter Obid; Karen Yiu; Kenneth Cheung; Kenny Kwan; Michael Ruf; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Growing rod concepts: state of the art.

Authors:  Muharrem Yazici; Z Deniz Olgun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Magnetically controlled growing rod in early onset scoliosis: a 30-case multicenter study.

Authors:  Julie Lebon; Cécile Batailler; Matthieu Wargny; Elie Choufani; Philippe Violas; Damien Fron; Jerry Kieffer; Franck Accadbled; Vincent Cunin; Jérôme Sales De Gauzy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Preliminary comparison of primary and conversion surgery with magnetically controlled growing rods in children with early onset scoliosis.

Authors:  Heli Keskinen; Ilkka Helenius; Colin Nnadi; Kenneth Cheung; J Ferguson; Gregory Mundis; Jeff Pawelek; Behrooz A Akbarnia
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Spine Deformity With Fused Ribs Treated With Proximal Rib- Versus Spine-Based Growing Constructs.

Authors:  A Noelle Larson; Fady J Baky; Tricia St Hilaire; Jeff Pawelek; David L Skaggs; John B Emans; Joshua M Pahys
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2019-01

8.  Early onset scoliosis: current concepts and controversies.

Authors:  Nicholas D Fletcher; Robert W Bruce
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-06

Review 9.  A comprehensive review of the diagnosis and management of congenital scoliosis.

Authors:  Charles E Mackel; Ajit Jada; Amer F Samdani; James H Stephen; James T Bennett; Ali A Baaj; Steven W Hwang
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Complications in the treatment of EOS: Is there a difference between rib vs. spine-based proximal anchors?

Authors:  Hiroko Matsumoto; Michael W Fields; Benjamin D Roye; David P Roye; David Skaggs; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Michael G Vitale
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-09-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.