Julie Lebon1,2,3, Cécile Batailler4, Matthieu Wargny5, Elie Choufani6, Philippe Violas7, Damien Fron8, Jerry Kieffer9, Franck Accadbled5, Vincent Cunin4, Jérôme Sales De Gauzy5. 1. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France. julie-lebon@hotmail.fr. 2. , 26 rue Dupont, 31500, Toulouse, France. julie-lebon@hotmail.fr. 3. Hôpital Pierre Paul Riquet (3è étage chirurgie orthopédique), CHU Toulouse Purpan, Place Baylac, 31000, Toulouse, France. julie-lebon@hotmail.fr. 4. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lyon, Lyon, France. 5. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France. 6. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Marseille, Marseille, France. 7. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France. 8. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France. 9. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire du Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Preliminary results of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) are encouraging. However, only short case series of MCGR for the treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) have been reported. Our aim was to evaluate its effectiveness and complications. METHODS: We report a 30-case retrospective, consecutive, multicenter series of MCGR. Effectiveness was judged upon: deformity correction and difficulties to achieve desired distraction. Secondary endpoints included complications and revision surgeries. RESULTS: Median age at surgery was 9.1 years (5-13). Mean follow-up was 18.4 months (12-33.9). Mean Cobb angle was 66° preoperatively and 44° at latest follow-up. MCGR has avoided an average of 2.03 scheduled surgical procedures per patient compared to traditional growing rod (GR). The intended total length gain was 40.1 mm per patient (5-140) and the total measured length gain was 21.9 mm (45.5% discrepancy). There were 24 complications: 7 proximal pull-outs of the hooks, 3 rod breakages, 6 failures of the lengthening of which 4 complete blockages and 2 complete blockages followed by backtracking, 1 proximal junctional kyphosis, 1 wound dehiscence, 1 superficial infection, 1 deep infection requiring implant removal, 1 pulmonary embolism, 1 pulmonary insufficiency, 1 secondary lumbar scoliosis, and 1 painful outpatient distraction. Eight patients had a gradual loss of effectiveness of distractions. There were 13 revision surgeries in 9 patients. CONCLUSIONS: MCGR provides satisfactory deformity correction and avoids repeated surgical procedures for lengthening. However, it has substantial complication rate. Although less frequent than in GR, the law of diminishing returns also applies to MCGR.
PURPOSE: Preliminary results of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) are encouraging. However, only short case series of MCGR for the treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) have been reported. Our aim was to evaluate its effectiveness and complications. METHODS: We report a 30-case retrospective, consecutive, multicenter series of MCGR. Effectiveness was judged upon: deformity correction and difficulties to achieve desired distraction. Secondary endpoints included complications and revision surgeries. RESULTS: Median age at surgery was 9.1 years (5-13). Mean follow-up was 18.4 months (12-33.9). Mean Cobb angle was 66° preoperatively and 44° at latest follow-up. MCGR has avoided an average of 2.03 scheduled surgical procedures per patient compared to traditional growing rod (GR). The intended total length gain was 40.1 mm per patient (5-140) and the total measured length gain was 21.9 mm (45.5% discrepancy). There were 24 complications: 7 proximal pull-outs of the hooks, 3 rod breakages, 6 failures of the lengthening of which 4 complete blockages and 2 complete blockages followed by backtracking, 1 proximal junctional kyphosis, 1 wound dehiscence, 1 superficial infection, 1 deep infection requiring implant removal, 1 pulmonary embolism, 1 pulmonary insufficiency, 1 secondary lumbar scoliosis, and 1 painful outpatient distraction. Eight patients had a gradual loss of effectiveness of distractions. There were 13 revision surgeries in 9 patients. CONCLUSIONS: MCGR provides satisfactory deformity correction and avoids repeated surgical procedures for lengthening. However, it has substantial complication rate. Although less frequent than in GR, the law of diminishing returns also applies to MCGR.
Authors: Justin S Yang; Mark J McElroy; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Pooria Salari; Daniel Oliveira; George H Thompson; John B Emans; Muharrem Yazici; David L Skaggs; Suken A Shah; Patricia N Kostial; Paul D Sponseller Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Date: 2010 Apr-May Impact factor: 2.324
Authors: Oliver M Stokes; Elizabeth J O'Donovan; Dino Samartzis; Cora H Bow; Keith D K Luk; Kenneth M C Cheung Journal: Spine J Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: George H Thompson; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Patricia Kostial; Connie Poe-Kochert; Douglas G Armstrong; Jeffrey Roh; Robert Lowe; Marc A Asher; David S Marks Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Shay Bess; Behrooz A Akbarnia; George H Thompson; Paul D Sponseller; Suken A Shah; Hazem El Sebaie; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Lawrence I Karlin; Sarah Canale; Connie Poe-Kochert; David L Skaggs Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Kar Hao Teoh; Abdul Nazeer Moideen; Kausik Mukherjee; Sridhar Kamath; Stuart H James; Alwyn Jones; John Howes; Paul R Davies; Sashin Ahuja Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Chrishan Thakar; David Christopher Kieser; Mihai Mardare; Shahnawaz Haleem; Jeremy Fairbank; Colin Nnadi Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Martina Tognini; Harry Hothi; Elisabetta Dal Gal; Masood Shafafy; Colin Nnadi; Stewart Tucker; Johann Henckel; Alister Hart Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Alastair Beaven; Adrian C Gardner; David S Marks; Jwalant S Mehta; Matthew Newton-Ede; Jonathan B Spilsbury Journal: Asian Spine J Date: 2018-09-10
Authors: Sebastian Lippross; Paul Girmond; Katja A Lüders; Friederike Austein; Lena Braunschweig; Stefan Lüders; Konstantinos Tsaknakis; Heiko M Lorenz; Anna K Hell Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Sebastiaan P J Wijdicks; Simon Toftgaard Skov; Haisheng Li; René M Castelein; Moyo C Kruyt; Cody Bünger Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2020-03-30
Authors: Heiko M Lorenz; Batoul Badwan; Marina M Hecker; Konstantinos Tsaknakis; Katharina Groenefeld; Lena Braunschweig; Anna K Hell Journal: JB JS Open Access Date: 2017-11-28