Literature DB >> 28040873

Magnetically controlled growing rod in early onset scoliosis: a 30-case multicenter study.

Julie Lebon1,2,3, Cécile Batailler4, Matthieu Wargny5, Elie Choufani6, Philippe Violas7, Damien Fron8, Jerry Kieffer9, Franck Accadbled5, Vincent Cunin4, Jérôme Sales De Gauzy5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preliminary results of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) are encouraging. However, only short case series of MCGR for the treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) have been reported. Our aim was to evaluate its effectiveness and complications.
METHODS: We report a 30-case retrospective, consecutive, multicenter series of MCGR. Effectiveness was judged upon: deformity correction and difficulties to achieve desired distraction. Secondary endpoints included complications and revision surgeries.
RESULTS: Median age at surgery was 9.1 years (5-13). Mean follow-up was 18.4 months (12-33.9). Mean Cobb angle was 66° preoperatively and 44° at latest follow-up. MCGR has avoided an average of 2.03 scheduled surgical procedures per patient compared to traditional growing rod (GR). The intended total length gain was 40.1 mm per patient (5-140) and the total measured length gain was 21.9 mm (45.5% discrepancy). There were 24 complications: 7 proximal pull-outs of the hooks, 3 rod breakages, 6 failures of the lengthening of which 4 complete blockages and 2 complete blockages followed by backtracking, 1 proximal junctional kyphosis, 1 wound dehiscence, 1 superficial infection, 1 deep infection requiring implant removal, 1 pulmonary embolism, 1 pulmonary insufficiency, 1 secondary lumbar scoliosis, and 1 painful outpatient distraction. Eight patients had a gradual loss of effectiveness of distractions. There were 13 revision surgeries in 9 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: MCGR provides satisfactory deformity correction and avoids repeated surgical procedures for lengthening. However, it has substantial complication rate. Although less frequent than in GR, the law of diminishing returns also applies to MCGR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Early onset scoliosis; Magnetically controlled growing rod; Multicenter study; Revision

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28040873     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4929-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  32 in total

1.  Scoliosis in the growing spine.

Authors:  P R HARRINGTON
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1963-02       Impact factor: 3.278

2.  Growing rods for spinal deformity: characterizing consensus and variation in current use.

Authors:  Justin S Yang; Mark J McElroy; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Pooria Salari; Daniel Oliveira; George H Thompson; John B Emans; Muharrem Yazici; David L Skaggs; Suken A Shah; Patricia N Kostial; Paul D Sponseller
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2010 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.324

3.  Magnetic controlled growth rods versus conventional growing rod systems in the treatment of early onset scoliosis: a cost comparison.

Authors:  Daniel Rolton; Joanna Richards; Colin Nnadi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Reducing radiation exposure in early-onset scoliosis surgery patients: novel use of ultrasonography to measure lengthening in magnetically-controlled growing rods.

Authors:  Oliver M Stokes; Elizabeth J O'Donovan; Dino Samartzis; Cora H Bow; Keith D K Luk; Kenneth M C Cheung
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Comparison of single and dual growing rod techniques followed through definitive surgery: a preliminary study.

Authors:  George H Thompson; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Patricia Kostial; Connie Poe-Kochert; Douglas G Armstrong; Jeffrey Roh; Robert Lowe; Marc A Asher; David S Marks
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Complications of growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: analysis of one hundred and forty patients.

Authors:  Shay Bess; Behrooz A Akbarnia; George H Thompson; Paul D Sponseller; Suken A Shah; Hazem El Sebaie; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Lawrence I Karlin; Sarah Canale; Connie Poe-Kochert; David L Skaggs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Magnetically controlled growing rods for severe spinal curvature in young children: a prospective case series.

Authors:  Kenneth Man-Chee Cheung; Jason Pui-Yin Cheung; Dino Samartzis; Kin-Cheung Mak; Yat-Wa Wong; Wai-Yuen Cheung; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Keith Dip-Kei Luk
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Cumulative effect of multiple trauma on symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression in adolescents.

Authors:  Sharain Suliman; Siyabulela G Mkabile; Dylan S Fincham; Rashid Ahmed; Dan J Stein; Soraya Seedat
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 3.735

9.  Preliminary Results of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods for Early Onset Scoliosis.

Authors:  Karsten Ridderbusch; Martin Rupprecht; Philip Kunkel; Christian Hagemann; Ralf Stücker
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  Growing rod techniques in early-onset scoliosis.

Authors:  George H Thompson; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Robert M Campbell
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2007 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.324

View more
  18 in total

1.  Magnetically controlled growing rods in early onset scoliosis: radiological results, outcome, and complications in a series of 22 patients.

Authors:  Peter Obid; Karen Yiu; Kenneth Cheung; Kenny Kwan; Michael Ruf; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Does the external remote controller's reading correspond to the actual lengthening in magnetic-controlled growing rods?

Authors:  Kar Hao Teoh; Abdul Nazeer Moideen; Kausik Mukherjee; Sridhar Kamath; Stuart H James; Alwyn Jones; John Howes; Paul R Davies; Sashin Ahuja
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Systematic review of the complications associated with magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early onset scoliosis.

Authors:  Chrishan Thakar; David Christopher Kieser; Mihai Mardare; Shahnawaz Haleem; Jeremy Fairbank; Colin Nnadi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Understanding the implant performance of magnetically controlled growing spine rods: a review article.

Authors:  Martina Tognini; Harry Hothi; Elisabetta Dal Gal; Masood Shafafy; Colin Nnadi; Stewart Tucker; Johann Henckel; Alister Hart
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Magnetically controlled growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis: a single centre experience of 44 patients with mean follow-up of 4.1 years.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdelaal; Sudarshan Munigangaiah; Jayesh Trivedi; Neil Davidson
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2020-11-02

6.  Use of intra-operative internal distraction for the application of magnetically controlled growth rods (MCGR): a technique for maximizing correction in the rigid immature spine during index surgery.

Authors:  Abhishek Srivastava; Naveen Pandita; Anuj Gupta; Ankur Goswami; G Vijayraghvan; Arvind Jayaswal
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-10-06

7.  Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods: The Experience of Mechanical Failure from a Single Center Consecutive Series of 28 Children with a Minimum Follow-up of 2 Years.

Authors:  Alastair Beaven; Adrian C Gardner; David S Marks; Jwalant S Mehta; Matthew Newton-Ede; Jonathan B Spilsbury
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-09-10

8.  Smaller Intervertebral Disc Volume and More Disc Degeneration after Spinal Distraction in Scoliotic Children.

Authors:  Sebastian Lippross; Paul Girmond; Katja A Lüders; Friederike Austein; Lena Braunschweig; Stefan Lüders; Konstantinos Tsaknakis; Heiko M Lorenz; Anna K Hell
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  3-Year follow-up of a single magnetically controlled growing rod with contralateral gliding system and apical control for early onset scoliosis.

Authors:  Sebastiaan P J Wijdicks; Simon Toftgaard Skov; Haisheng Li; René M Castelein; Moyo C Kruyt; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-03-30

10.  Magnetically Controlled Devices Parallel to the Spine in Children with Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Authors:  Heiko M Lorenz; Batoul Badwan; Marina M Hecker; Konstantinos Tsaknakis; Katharina Groenefeld; Lena Braunschweig; Anna K Hell
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2017-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.