BACKGROUND: The present study estimated survival benefits from lymph node dissection at the splenic hilus in advanced proximal gastric cancer patients who underwent total gastrectomy with simultaneous splenectomy, and then determined patient subgroups that received relatively high survival benefits from splenectomy. METHODS: A total of 280 patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer who underwent curative total gastrectomy with simultaneous splenectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with primary tumors directly invading the spleen or pancreas and those with gross metastases to the para-aortic nodes, as determined by intraoperative diagnosis, were excluded from analyses. The index of estimated benefit from lymph node dissection at the splenic hilus by splenectomy was calculated for each clinicopathological factor by multiplying the incidence of splenic hilar metastasis by the 5-year survival rate of patients with metastasis to that nodal station. RESULTS: Thirty patients (10.7%) showed lymph node metastasis at the splenic hilus, and the 5-year survival rate of these patients was 51.3% (overall index 5.49). The index was relatively high in patient subgroups with tumors localized on the greater curvature (19.4) and Borrmann type 4 cancers (12.9), while relatively low in subgroups with encircling tumors (1.62) and tumors invading adjacent organs other than the spleen and pancreas (0). CONCLUSION: Patients with tumors localized on the greater curvature and Borrmann type 4 cancers might obtain relatively high survival benefits from lymph node dissection at the splenic hilus by splenectomy.
BACKGROUND: The present study estimated survival benefits from lymph node dissection at the splenic hilus in advanced proximal gastric cancerpatients who underwent total gastrectomy with simultaneous splenectomy, and then determined patient subgroups that received relatively high survival benefits from splenectomy. METHODS: A total of 280 patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer who underwent curative total gastrectomy with simultaneous splenectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with primary tumors directly invading the spleen or pancreas and those with gross metastases to the para-aortic nodes, as determined by intraoperative diagnosis, were excluded from analyses. The index of estimated benefit from lymph node dissection at the splenic hilus by splenectomy was calculated for each clinicopathological factor by multiplying the incidence of splenic hilar metastasis by the 5-year survival rate of patients with metastasis to that nodal station. RESULTS: Thirty patients (10.7%) showed lymph node metastasis at the splenic hilus, and the 5-year survival rate of these patients was 51.3% (overall index 5.49). The index was relatively high in patient subgroups with tumors localized on the greater curvature (19.4) and Borrmann type 4 cancers (12.9), while relatively low in subgroups with encircling tumors (1.62) and tumors invading adjacent organs other than the spleen and pancreas (0). CONCLUSION:Patients with tumors localized on the greater curvature and Borrmann type 4 cancers might obtain relatively high survival benefits from lymph node dissection at the splenic hilus by splenectomy.
Authors: J J Bonenkamp; J Hermans; M Sasako; C J van de Velde; K Welvaart; I Songun; S Meyer; J T Plukker; P Van Elk; H Obertop; D J Gouma; J J van Lanschot; C W Taat; P W de Graaf; M F von Meyenfeldt; H Tilanus Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-03-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Attila Csendes; Patricio Burdiles; Jorge Rojas; Italo Braghetto; Juan Carlos Diaz; Fernando Maluenda Journal: Surgery Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 3.982