Literature DB >> 27450211

The effects of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy on the surgical outcome of proximal gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched, case-control study.

Chang-Ming Huang1, Tan Chen2, Jian-Xian Lin2, Qi-Yue Chen2, Chao-Hui Zheng2, Ping Li2, Jian-Wei Xie2, Jia-Bin Wang2, Jun Lu2, Long-Long Cao2, Mi Lin2, Ru-Hong Tu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The evidence regarding the long-term results of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSPL) has only been rarely reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and oncologic efficacy of LSPL for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer.
METHODS: From May 2007 to December 2012, we prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed the data of 548 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy due to proximal gastric cancer. The patients were grouped according to spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (200 in the D2 group and 348 in the D2-group). The short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups after propensity score matching.
RESULTS: Before matching, TNM stages were significantly different between the D2 and D2-groups. After propensity score matching, the two groups were well balanced in clinicopathologic characteristics. After matching, the time for lymph node dissection was longer in the D2 group, but a greater number of lymph nodes were dissected; the estimated blood loss, time to first flatus and duration of hospital stay were similar in the two groups. Furthermore, no significant differences in morbidity and mortality were found. Before matching, the 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of the D2 group were comparable with those of the D2-group (62.4 vs. 57.7 %, p = 0.076). After matching, the 3-year OS remained comparable, but the D2 group showed significantly longer 3-year DFS (61.6 vs. 53.7 %, p = 0.034). Stratified analysis showed that, in stage III patients, the D2 group had better 3-year DFS. Multivariate Cox regression showed that age (p = 0.003), operation (p = 0.001) and pN stage (p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: LSPL is a safe and feasible procedure, and patients with stage III proximal gastric cancer might obtain higher 3-year DFS rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic total gastrectomy; Propensity score matching; Proximal gastric cancer; Splenic hilar lymphadenectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27450211     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5126-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  30 in total

1.  Spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy at the time of gastrectomy for cancer: technical feasibility and early results.

Authors:  Roderich E Schwarz
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Prognostic significance of splenic hilar nodal involvement in proximal third gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Tomoyoshi Takayama; Kohei Wakatsuki; Sohei Matsumoto; Koji Enomoto; Tetsuya Tanaka; Kazuhiro Migita; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr

3.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy in patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer.

Authors:  Noriko Wada; Yukinori Kurokawa; Shuji Takiguchi; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Makoto Yamasaki; Hiroshi Miyata; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 5.  Huang's three-step maneuver for laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chang-Ming Huang; Qi-Yue Chen; Jian-Xian Lin; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Frequency of lymph node metastasis to the splenic hilus and effect of splenectomy in proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Shinsuke Sasada; Motoki Ninomiya; Masahiko Nishizaki; Masao Harano; Yasutomo Ojima; Hiroyoshi Matsukawa; Hideki Aoki; Shigehiro Shiozaki; Satoshi Ohno; Norohisa Takakura
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  A prospective randomized study comparing D2 total gastrectomy versus D2 total gastrectomy plus splenectomy in 187 patients with gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Attila Csendes; Patricio Burdiles; Jorge Rojas; Italo Braghetto; Juan Carlos Diaz; Fernando Maluenda
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Procedure for lymph node dissection around splenic artery in proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masakazu Ohno; Takeshi Nakamura; Tetsuo Ajiki; Hideki Horiuchi; Yoshiki Tabuchi; Yoshikazu Kuroda
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

9.  Clinical significance of splenic hilar lymph node metastasis in proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Suk Hee Shin; Hun Jung; Seong Hee Choi; Ji Yeong An; Min Gew Choi; Jae Hyung Noh; Tae Sung Sohn; Jae Moon Bae; Sung Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  A 346 case analysis for laparoscopic spleen-preserving no.10 lymph node dissection for proximal gastric cancer: a single center study.

Authors:  Chang-Ming Huang; Jun-Rong Zhang; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Clinical Relevance of Splenic Hilar Lymph Node Dissection for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matching Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Jian-Xian Lin; Zu-Kai Wang; Ying-Qi Huang; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ze-Ning Huang; Ju-Li Lin; Hua-Long Zheng; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang; Ping Li
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Short-term efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy via Huang's three-step maneuver for advanced upper gastric cancer: Results from a propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Jia-Bin Wang; Zhi-Yu Liu; Qi-Yue Chen; Qing Zhong; Jian-Wei Xie; Jian-Xian Lin; Jun Lu; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ze-Ning Huang; Ju-Li Lin; Hua-Long Zheng; Si-Jin Que; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang; Ping Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Efficacy of the No. 10 lymphadenectomy with spleen preservation on patients with gastric cancer and/or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma who underwent total gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bo-Wei Xia; Chen Wang; Yong-Yong Liu; Yong Fan; Xiao-Dong He; Ying-Xin Kang; Xin-Yuan Zhou; Xiao-Lu Su; Yue-Bin Wang; Min-Xue Chen; Bo-Xiong Kang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 0.496

4.  Current status of lymph node dissection in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Bin Ke; Han Liang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 5.  Disadvantages of Complete No. 10 Lymph Node Dissection in Gastric Cancer and the Possibility of Spleen-Preserving Dissection: Review.

Authors:  Tetsuro Toriumi; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.720

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.