BACKGROUND: Compared to non-inflammatory breast cancer (non-IBC), inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) has less favorable survival and is more likely to be estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) negative. ER-/PR- tumors, regardless of histology, have less favorable survival. While black women are more likely to have IBC and ER-/PR- tumors than white women, it is unclear whether the racial disparity in survival is explained by these factors. The objective of this study was to assess racial/ethnic differences in breast cancer survival by inflammatory status and hormone receptor status. METHODS: This study examined breast cancer mortality among non-Hispanic white (NHW), Hispanic white, black, and Asian/Pacific Islander (API) women diagnosed between 1990 and 2004 using the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) assessed the relationship between race/ethnicity and survival. RESULTS: Black women had significantly poorer survival than NHW women regardless of inflammatory status and hormone receptor status. Compared to NHWs, the HRs for black women were 1.32 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.21-1.44), 1.43 (95 % CI 1.20-1.69), and 1.30 (95 % CI 1.16-1.47) for IBC, IBC with ER+/PR+, and with ER-/PR-, respectively. Similar HRs were found for non-IBC, non-IBC with ER+/PR-, and non-IBC with ER-/PR-. API women had significantly better survival than NHW women regardless of inflammatory status and hormone receptor status. CONCLUSION: Compared to NHW women, black women had poorer survival regardless of inflammatory status and hormone receptor status and API women had better survival. These results suggest that factors other than inflammatory status and hormone receptor status may play a role in racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer survival.
BACKGROUND: Compared to non-inflammatory breast cancer (non-IBC), inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) has less favorable survival and is more likely to be estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) negative. ER-/PR- tumors, regardless of histology, have less favorable survival. While black women are more likely to have IBC and ER-/PR- tumors than white women, it is unclear whether the racial disparity in survival is explained by these factors. The objective of this study was to assess racial/ethnic differences in breast cancer survival by inflammatory status and hormone receptor status. METHODS: This study examined breast cancer mortality among non-Hispanic white (NHW), Hispanic white, black, and Asian/Pacific Islander (API) women diagnosed between 1990 and 2004 using the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) assessed the relationship between race/ethnicity and survival. RESULTS: Black women had significantly poorer survival than NHW women regardless of inflammatory status and hormone receptor status. Compared to NHWs, the HRs for black women were 1.32 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.21-1.44), 1.43 (95 % CI 1.20-1.69), and 1.30 (95 % CI 1.16-1.47) for IBC, IBC with ER+/PR+, and with ER-/PR-, respectively. Similar HRs were found for non-IBC, non-IBC with ER+/PR-, and non-IBC with ER-/PR-. API women had significantly better survival than NHW women regardless of inflammatory status and hormone receptor status. CONCLUSION: Compared to NHW women, black women had poorer survival regardless of inflammatory status and hormone receptor status and API women had better survival. These results suggest that factors other than inflammatory status and hormone receptor status may play a role in racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer survival.
Authors: Steve R Martinez; Shannon H Beal; Steven L Chen; Robert J Canter; Vijay P Khatri; Allen Chen; Richard J Bold Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-07-07 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Victor R Grann; Andrea B Troxel; Naseem J Zojwalla; Judith S Jacobson; Dawn Hershman; Alfred I Neugut Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Carlos H Barcenas; Jeremy Wells; Daniel Chong; John French; Stephen W Looney; Thomas A Samuel Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Julie Worthington; John W Waterbor; Ellen Funkhouser; Carla Falkson; Stacey Cofield; Mona Fouad Journal: Int J Med Sci Date: 2008-07-07 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Theresa Relation; Yaming Li; James L Fisher; Allan Tsung; Bridget Oppong; Mariam F Eskander; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi Journal: Surgery Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Muthana Al Abo; Larisa Gearhart-Serna; Steven Van Laere; Jennifer A Freedman; Steven R Patierno; Eun-Sil Shelley Hwang; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Kevin P Williams; Gayathri R Devi Journal: NPJ Breast Cancer Date: 2022-06-13
Authors: Behjatolah Monzavi-Karbassi; Eric R Siegel; Srikanth Medarametla; Issam Makhoul; Thomas Kieber-Emmons Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 2.967