Literature DB >> 21321600

Reprogramming to pluripotency: stepwise resetting of the epigenetic landscape.

Bernadett Papp1, Kathrin Plath.   

Abstract

In 2006, the "wall came down" that limited the experimental conversion of differentiated cells into the pluripotent state. In a landmark report, Shinya Yamanaka's group described that a handful of transcription factors (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc) can convert a differentiated cell back to pluripotency over the course of a few weeks, thus reprograming them into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. The birth of iPS cells started off a rush among researchers to increase the efficiency of the reprogramming process, to reveal the underlying mechanistic events, and allowed the generation of patient- and disease-specific human iPS cells, which have the potential to be converted into relevant specialized cell types for replacement therapies and disease modeling. This review addresses the steps involved in resetting the epigenetic landscape during reprogramming. Apparently, defined events occur during the course of the reprogramming process. Immediately, upon expression of the reprogramming factors, some cells start to divide faster and quickly begin to lose their differentiated cell characteristics with robust downregulation of somatic genes. Only a subset of cells continue to upregulate the embryonic expression program, and finally, pluripotency genes are upregulated establishing an embryonic stem cell-like transcriptome and epigenome with pluripotent capabilities. Understanding reprogramming to pluripotency will inform mechanistic studies of lineage switching, in which differentiated cells from one lineage can be directly reprogrammed into another without going through a pluripotent intermediate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21321600      PMCID: PMC3193418          DOI: 10.1038/cr.2011.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Res        ISSN: 1001-0602            Impact factor:   25.617


  128 in total

Review 1.  X chromosome dosage compensation: how mammals keep the balance.

Authors:  Bernhard Payer; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic fibroblasts by Oct4 and Klf4 with small-molecule compounds.

Authors:  Yan Shi; Caroline Desponts; Jeong Tae Do; Heung Sik Hahm; Hans R Schöler; Sheng Ding
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 3.  Regulation of pluripotency and reprogramming by transcription factors.

Authors:  Duanqing Pei
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Induced pluripotent stem cells generated without viral integration.

Authors:  Matthias Stadtfeld; Masaki Nagaya; Jochen Utikal; Gordon Weir; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Induced pluripotent stem cells from a spinal muscular atrophy patient.

Authors:  Allison D Ebert; Junying Yu; Ferrill F Rose; Virginia B Mattis; Christian L Lorson; James A Thomson; Clive N Svendsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2.

Authors:  Danwei Huangfu; Kenji Osafune; René Maehr; Wenjun Guo; Astrid Eijkelenboom; Shuibing Chen; Whitney Muhlestein; Douglas A Melton
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Efficient and rapid generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human keratinocytes.

Authors:  Trond Aasen; Angel Raya; Maria J Barrero; Elena Garreta; Antonella Consiglio; Federico Gonzalez; Rita Vassena; Josipa Bilić; Vladimir Pekarik; Gustavo Tiscornia; Michael Edel; Stéphanie Boué; Juan Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Role of the murine reprogramming factors in the induction of pluripotency.

Authors:  Rupa Sridharan; Jason Tchieu; Mike J Mason; Robin Yachechko; Edward Kuoy; Steve Horvath; Qing Zhou; Kathrin Plath
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Promotion of reprogramming to ground state pluripotency by signal inhibition.

Authors:  Jose Silva; Ornella Barrandon; Jennifer Nichols; Jitsutaro Kawaguchi; Thorold W Theunissen; Austin Smith
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Global reorganization of replication domains during embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Ichiro Hiratani; Tyrone Ryba; Mari Itoh; Tomoki Yokochi; Michaela Schwaiger; Chia-Wei Chang; Yung Lyou; Tim M Townes; Dirk Schübeler; David M Gilbert
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  81 in total

1.  Pre-procambial cells are niches for pluripotent and totipotent stem-like cells for organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in the peach palm: a histological study.

Authors:  Marcilio de Almeida; Cristina Vieira de Almeida; Erika Mendes Graner; Gilvano Ebling Brondani; Monita Fiori de Abreu-Tarazi
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 4.570

Review 2.  Concise review: the involvement of SOX2 in direct reprogramming of induced neural stem/precursor cells.

Authors:  Christof Maucksch; Kathryn S Jones; Bronwen Connor
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 3.  Gene silencing and Polycomb group proteins: an overview of their structure, mechanisms and phylogenetics.

Authors:  Shahram Golbabapour; Nazia Abdul Majid; Pouya Hassandarvish; Maryam Hajrezaie; Mahmood Ameen Abdulla; A Hamid A Hadi
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2013-06

Review 4.  Epigenetic control of embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Lyle Armstrong
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 5.  Cell signalling pathways underlying induced pluripotent stem cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Kate Hawkins; Shona Joy; Tristan McKay
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 6.  Transcription factor-mediated epigenetic reprogramming.

Authors:  Camille Sindhu; Payman Samavarchi-Tehrani; Alexander Meissner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  Lineage conversion methodologies meet the reprogramming toolbox.

Authors:  Ignacio Sancho-Martinez; Sung Hee Baek; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  Morphological and molecular changes of human granulosa cells exposed to 5-azacytidine and addressed toward muscular differentiation.

Authors:  Tiziana A L Brevini; Georgia Pennarossa; Mahbubur M Rahman; Alessio Paffoni; Stefania Antonini; Guido Ragni; Magda deEguileor; Gianluca Tettamanti; Fulvio Gandolfi
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.739

9.  Direct conversion of human fibroblasts into functional osteoblasts by defined factors.

Authors:  Kenta Yamamoto; Tsunao Kishida; Yoshiki Sato; Keisuke Nishioka; Akika Ejima; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Toshikazu Kubo; Toshiro Yamamoto; Narisato Kanamura; Osam Mazda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Current status in cancer cell reprogramming and its clinical implications.

Authors:  Kenan Izgi; Halit Canatan; Banu Iskender
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.