AIM: This study was designed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of isoniazid in South African pulmonary tuberculosis patients. METHODS: Concentration-time measurements obtained from 235 patients receiving oral doses of isoniazid as part of routine tuberculosis chemotherapy in two clinical studies were pooled and subjected to nonlinear mixed-effects analysis. RESULTS: A two-compartmental model, including first-order absorption and elimination with allometric scaling, was found to describe the observed dose-exposure relationship for oral isoniazid adequately. A mixture model was used to characterize dual rates of isoniazid elimination. Estimates of apparent clearance in slow and fast eliminators were 9.70 and 21.6 l h(-1) , respectively. The proportion of fast eliminators in the population was estimated to be 13.2%. Central volume of distribution was estimated to be 10% smaller in female patients and clearance was found to be 17% lower in patients with HIV. Variability in absorption rate (90%) was completely interoccasional in nature, whereas in relative bioavailability, interoccasional variability (8.4%) was lower than interindividual variability (26%). Oral doses, given once daily according to dosing policies at the time, were sufficient to reach therapeutic concentrations in the majority of the studied population, regardless of eliminator phenotype. Simulations suggested that current treatment guidelines (5 mg kg(-1) ) may be suboptimal in fast eliminators with low body weight. CONCLUSIONS: A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to characterize the highly variable pharmacokinetics of isoniazid in a South African pulmonary tuberculosis patient population. Current treatment guidelines may lead to underexposure in rapid isoniazid eliminators.
AIM: This study was designed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of isoniazid in South African pulmonary tuberculosispatients. METHODS: Concentration-time measurements obtained from 235 patients receiving oral doses of isoniazid as part of routine tuberculosis chemotherapy in two clinical studies were pooled and subjected to nonlinear mixed-effects analysis. RESULTS: A two-compartmental model, including first-order absorption and elimination with allometric scaling, was found to describe the observed dose-exposure relationship for oral isoniazid adequately. A mixture model was used to characterize dual rates of isoniazid elimination. Estimates of apparent clearance in slow and fast eliminators were 9.70 and 21.6 l h(-1) , respectively. The proportion of fast eliminators in the population was estimated to be 13.2%. Central volume of distribution was estimated to be 10% smaller in female patients and clearance was found to be 17% lower in patients with HIV. Variability in absorption rate (90%) was completely interoccasional in nature, whereas in relative bioavailability, interoccasional variability (8.4%) was lower than interindividual variability (26%). Oral doses, given once daily according to dosing policies at the time, were sufficient to reach therapeutic concentrations in the majority of the studied population, regardless of eliminator phenotype. Simulations suggested that current treatment guidelines (5 mg kg(-1) ) may be suboptimal in fast eliminators with low body weight. CONCLUSIONS: A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to characterize the highly variable pharmacokinetics of isoniazid in a South African pulmonary tuberculosispatient population. Current treatment guidelines may lead to underexposure in rapid isoniazid eliminators.
Authors: Alexandre Loktionov; William Moore; Steven P Spencer; Hester Vorster; Theo Nell; Ian K O'Neill; Sheila A Bingham; John H Cummings Journal: Cancer Detect Prev Date: 2002
Authors: L Lalande; L Bourguignon; S Bihari; P Maire; M Neely; R Jelliffe; S Goutelle Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-06-15 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Emmanuel Chigutsa; Jotam G Pasipanodya; Marianne E Visser; Paul D van Helden; Peter J Smith; Frederick A Sirgel; Tawanda Gumbo; Helen McIlleron Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Elsje Pienaar; Nicholas A Cilfone; Philana Ling Lin; Véronique Dartois; Joshua T Mattila; J Russell Butler; JoAnne L Flynn; Denise E Kirschner; Jennifer J Linderman Journal: J Theor Biol Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 2.691
Authors: Rob C van Wijk; Wanbin Hu; Sharka M Dijkema; Dirk-Jan van den Berg; Jeremy Liu; Rida Bahi; Fons J Verbeek; Ulrika S H Simonsson; Herman P Spaink; Piet H van der Graaf; Elke H J Krekels Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 8.739