Maxwell T Chirehwa1, Helen McIlleron1, Lubbe Wiesner1, Dissou Affolabi2, Oumou Bah-Sow3, Corinne Merle4,5, Paolo Denti1. 1. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. 2. National Programme for Tuberculosis and Pulmonary Diseases, Cotonou, Benin. 3. Service de Pneumo-Phtisiologie, Hopital Ignace Deen, Conakry, Guinea. 4. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 5. UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme on Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the pharmacokinetics of isoniazid and acetyl-isoniazid in TB/HIV-coinfected patients, and assess the effects of efavirenz co-administration and a 50% increase in the dose of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetic parameters of isoniazid and acetyl-isoniazid. Methods: TB/HIV-coinfected patients participating in the three-treatment-arm RAFA randomized controlled trial conducted in West Africa were recruited into the pharmacokinetics sub-study. Five serial blood samples were collected on a single visit between 4 and 8 weeks after initiation of antituberculosis treatment. Concentration-time data for isoniazid and acetyl-isoniazid were analysed using non-linear mixed-effects models. Results:Isoniazid concentrations from 150 patients were available for analysis, and 79 of these (53%) also had concentrations of acetyl-isoniazid. Isoniazid pharmacokinetics was best described with a two-compartment disposition model with lagged first-order absorption and elimination using a semi-mechanistic model describing hepatic extraction. The model identified two elimination pathways, separating formation of acetyl-isoniazid from other routes of metabolism. The predicted AUC0-24 is reduced by 29% in patients who are fast acetylators of isoniazid and receiving efavirenz-based ART (6.73 versus 4.68 mg·h/L). In slow acetylators, efavirenz-based ART had no effect on isoniazid exposure (AUC0-24 = 17.5 mg·h/L). Conclusions: Efavirenz-based ART affects the acetylation metabolic pathway amongst rapid acetylators, resulting in reduced exposure to isoniazid. Pharmacokinetics of isoniazid and acetyl-isoniazid were not influenced by the 50% increase in rifampicin dose.
RCT Entities:
Objectives: To describe the pharmacokinetics of isoniazid and acetyl-isoniazid in TB/HIV-coinfectedpatients, and assess the effects of efavirenz co-administration and a 50% increase in the dose of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetic parameters of isoniazid and acetyl-isoniazid. Methods: TB/HIV-coinfectedpatients participating in the three-treatment-arm RAFA randomized controlled trial conducted in West Africa were recruited into the pharmacokinetics sub-study. Five serial blood samples were collected on a single visit between 4 and 8 weeks after initiation of antituberculosis treatment. Concentration-time data for isoniazid and acetyl-isoniazid were analysed using non-linear mixed-effects models. Results:Isoniazid concentrations from 150 patients were available for analysis, and 79 of these (53%) also had concentrations of acetyl-isoniazid. Isoniazid pharmacokinetics was best described with a two-compartment disposition model with lagged first-order absorption and elimination using a semi-mechanistic model describing hepatic extraction. The model identified two elimination pathways, separating formation of acetyl-isoniazid from other routes of metabolism. The predicted AUC0-24 is reduced by 29% in patients who are fast acetylators of isoniazid and receiving efavirenz-based ART (6.73 versus 4.68 mg·h/L). In slow acetylators, efavirenz-based ART had no effect on isoniazid exposure (AUC0-24 = 17.5 mg·h/L). Conclusions: Efavirenz-based ART affects the acetylation metabolic pathway amongst rapid acetylators, resulting in reduced exposure to isoniazid. Pharmacokinetics of isoniazid and acetyl-isoniazid were not influenced by the 50% increase in rifampicin dose.
Authors: N B Bhatt; C Barau; A Amin; E Baudin; B Meggi; C Silva; V Furlan; B Grinsztejn; A Barrail-Tran; M Bonnet; A M Taburet Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: P R Donald; F A Sirgel; A Venter; D P Parkin; H I Seifart; B W van de Wal; C Werely; P D van Helden; J S Maritz Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2004-10-25 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Paolo Denti; Kidola Jeremiah; Emmanuel Chigutsa; Daniel Faurholt-Jepsen; George PrayGod; Nyagosya Range; Sandra Castel; Lubbe Wiesner; Christian Munch Hagen; Michael Christiansen; John Changalucha; Helen McIlleron; Henrik Friis; Aase Bengaard Andersen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christine Sekaggya-Wiltshire; Maxwell Chirehwa; Joseph Musaazi; Amrei von Braun; Allan Buzibye; Daniel Muller; Ursula Gutteck; Ilaria Motta; Andrea Calcagno; Jan S Fehr; Andrew Kambugu; Barbara Castelnuovo; Mohammed Lamorde; Paolo Denti Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Agathe Béranger; Adrie Bekker; Belén P Solans; Mark F Cotton; Mark Mirochnick; Avy Violari; Jiajia Wang; Mae Cababasay; Lubbe Wiesner; Renee Browning; Jack Moye; Edmund V Capparelli; Radojka M Savic Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2022-09-29 Impact factor: 20.999
Authors: Maxwell T Chirehwa; Richard Court; Mariana de Kock; Lubbe Wiesner; Nihal de Vries; Joseph Harding; Tawanda Gumbo; Gary Maartens; Rob Warren; Paolo Denti; Helen McIlleron Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: K B Arun; Aravind Madhavan; Billu Abraham; M Balaji; K C Sivakumar; P Nisha; R Ajay Kumar Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Nicholas D Walter; Sarah E M Born; Gregory T Robertson; Matthew Reichlen; Christian Dide-Agossou; Victoria A Ektnitphong; Karen Rossmassler; Michelle E Ramey; Allison A Bauman; Victor Ozols; Shelby C Bearrows; Gary Schoolnik; Gregory Dolganov; Benjamin Garcia; Emmanuel Musisi; William Worodria; Laurence Huang; J Lucian Davis; Nhung V Nguyen; Hung V Nguyen; Anh T V Nguyen; Ha Phan; Carol Wilusz; Brendan K Podell; N' Dira Sanoussi; Bouke C de Jong; Corinne S Merle; Dissou Affolabi; Helen McIlleron; Maria Garcia-Cremades; Ekaterina Maidji; Franceen Eshun-Wilson; Brandon Aguilar-Rodriguez; Dhuvarakesh Karthikeyan; Khisimuzi Mdluli; Cathy Bansbach; Anne J Lenaerts; Radojka M Savic; Payam Nahid; Joshua J Vásquez; Martin I Voskuil Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Ingrid F Metzger; Nimita Dave; Yvonne Kreutz; Jessica B L Lu; Raymond E Galinsky; Zeruesenay Desta Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Marieke G G Sturkenboom; Anne-Grete Märtson; Elin M Svensson; Derek J Sloan; Kelly E Dooley; Simone H J van den Elsen; Paolo Denti; Charles A Peloquin; Rob E Aarnoutse; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2021-03-06 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Stijn W van Beek; Rob Ter Heine; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar; Cecile Magis-Escurra; Rob E Aarnoutse; Elin M Svensson Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 6.447