UNLABELLED: The amount and intensity of walking to maintain a healthy skeleton is unknown. This study examined the relationship between habitual walking activity and femoral bone mineral density (BMD) in healthy individuals using a quantitative theory for bone maintenance. Our results suggest a gender, weight, and speed sensitivity of walking interventions. INTRODUCTION: Walking has been extensively promoted for the prevention of osteoporosis. The amount and intensity of walking to maintain a healthy skeleton is unknown and evidence to support a specific target of steps per day is lacking. The goal of our study was to examine the relationship between habitual walking activity and femoral bone mineral density (BMD) in healthy individuals using a quantitative theory for bone maintenance. METHODS: Habitual walking activity and total femur BMD were measured in 105 individuals (49-64 years). An index of cumulative loading (bone density index, BDI) was examined as a predictor of BMD. The BDI-BMD relationship was used to predict the steps per day to maintain healthy BMD values for a range of body weights (BW) and walking speeds. RESULTS: For females but not for males, BDI was correlated with BMD (r (2) = 0.19, p < 0.001). The total required steps per day to maintain a T-score of -1.0 for a female with the average BW of the study cohort, walking at 1.00 m/s is 4,892 steps/day. Substantially more steps (18,568 steps/day) are required for a female with a BW 20% lighter than the average for our female cohort. For these lighter females, only at a walking speed greater than 1.32 m/s was 10,000 steps/day sufficient to maintain a T-score of -1.0. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a gender, weight, and speed sensitivity of walking interventions for osteoporosis. In persons of low BW, the necessary steps per day to maintain BMD can be substantially greater than the often-quoted 10,000 steps.
UNLABELLED: The amount and intensity of walking to maintain a healthy skeleton is unknown. This study examined the relationship between habitual walking activity and femoral bone mineral density (BMD) in healthy individuals using a quantitative theory for bone maintenance. Our results suggest a gender, weight, and speed sensitivity of walking interventions. INTRODUCTION: Walking has been extensively promoted for the prevention of osteoporosis. The amount and intensity of walking to maintain a healthy skeleton is unknown and evidence to support a specific target of steps per day is lacking. The goal of our study was to examine the relationship between habitual walking activity and femoral bone mineral density (BMD) in healthy individuals using a quantitative theory for bone maintenance. METHODS: Habitual walking activity and total femur BMD were measured in 105 individuals (49-64 years). An index of cumulative loading (bone density index, BDI) was examined as a predictor of BMD. The BDI-BMD relationship was used to predict the steps per day to maintain healthy BMD values for a range of body weights (BW) and walking speeds. RESULTS: For females but not for males, BDI was correlated with BMD (r (2) = 0.19, p < 0.001). The total required steps per day to maintain a T-score of -1.0 for a female with the average BW of the study cohort, walking at 1.00 m/s is 4,892 steps/day. Substantially more steps (18,568 steps/day) are required for a female with a BW 20% lighter than the average for our female cohort. For these lighter females, only at a walking speed greater than 1.32 m/s was 10,000 steps/day sufficient to maintain a T-score of -1.0. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a gender, weight, and speed sensitivity of walking interventions for osteoporosis. In persons of low BW, the necessary steps per day to maintain BMD can be substantially greater than the often-quoted 10,000 steps.
Authors: Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Rebecca L Lambach; Nicole E Stafford; Julie A Kolesar; B Jenny Kiratli; Graham H Creasey; Robin S Gibbons; Brian J Andrews; Gary S Beaupre Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Jonathan H Tobias; Virginia Gould; Luke Brunton; Kevin Deere; Joern Rittweger; Matthijs Lipperts; Bernd Grimm Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 5.555
Authors: Aleš Gába; Roman Cuberek; Zdeněk Svoboda; František Chmelík; Jana Pelclová; Michal Lehnert; Karel Frömel Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 2.809