OBJECTIVE: To determine whether measurement of synovial enhancement and thickness quantification parameters with 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3-T MRI) can reliably quantify disease activity in patients with early polyarthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients (16 women, 2 men; mean age 46 years) with early polyarthritis with less than 12 months of symptoms were included. MRI examination using 3-T device was performed by a new approach including both wrists and hands simultaneously in the examination field-of-view. MRI scoring of disease activity included quantification of synovial enhancement with simple measurements such as rate of early enhancement (REE; REE(57) = S(57)/S(200), where S(57) and S(200) are the signal intensities 57 s and 200 s after gadolinium injection) and rate of relative enhancement (RE; RE = S(200) - S(0)). Both wrists and hands were scored according to the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) for synovitis. Disease activity was clinically assessed by the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28). RESULTS: DAS28 score was strongly correlated with RE (r = 0.8331, p < 0.0001), REE (r = 0.8112, p < 0.0001), and RAMRIS score for synovitis (r = 0.7659, p < 0.0002). An REE score above 0.778 accurately identified patients with clinically active disease (sensitivity 92%; specificity 67%; p < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was observed in the RE, REE, and RAMRIS scores for synovitis between patients with active and inactive disease (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the use of 3-T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for precise quantification of disease activity and for discriminating active disease from inactive disease in early polyarthritis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether measurement of synovial enhancement and thickness quantification parameters with 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3-T MRI) can reliably quantify disease activity in patients with early polyarthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients (16 women, 2 men; mean age 46 years) with early polyarthritis with less than 12 months of symptoms were included. MRI examination using 3-T device was performed by a new approach including both wrists and hands simultaneously in the examination field-of-view. MRI scoring of disease activity included quantification of synovial enhancement with simple measurements such as rate of early enhancement (REE; REE(57) = S(57)/S(200), where S(57) and S(200) are the signal intensities 57 s and 200 s after gadolinium injection) and rate of relative enhancement (RE; RE = S(200) - S(0)). Both wrists and hands were scored according to the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) for synovitis. Disease activity was clinically assessed by the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28). RESULTS: DAS28 score was strongly correlated with RE (r = 0.8331, p < 0.0001), REE (r = 0.8112, p < 0.0001), and RAMRIS score for synovitis (r = 0.7659, p < 0.0002). An REE score above 0.778 accurately identified patients with clinically active disease (sensitivity 92%; specificity 67%; p < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was observed in the RE, REE, and RAMRIS scores for synovitis between patients with active and inactive disease (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the use of 3-T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for precise quantification of disease activity and for discriminating active disease from inactive disease in early polyarthritis.
Authors: Kari Palosaari; Jorma Vuotila; Reijo Takalo; Airi Jartti; Raija K Niemelä; Anna Karjalainen; Marianne Haapea; Irma Soini; Osmo Tervonen; Markku Hakala Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2006-05-02 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Laura A Rhodes; Ai Lyn Tan; Steven F Tanner; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Elizabeth M A Hensor; Richard Reece; Philip O'Connor; Paul Emery; Dennis McGonagle Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2004-08
Authors: Marissa Lassere; Fiona McQueen; Mikkel Østergaard; Philip Conaghan; Ron Shnier; Charles Peterfy; Mette Klarlund; Paul Bird; Philip O'Connor; Neal Stewart; Paul Emery; Harry Genant; John Edmonds Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: K Palosaari; J Vuotila; R Takalo; A Jartti; R Niemelä; M Haapea; I Soini; O Tervonen; M Hakala Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2004-07-06 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Ryan K L Lee; James F Griffith; D F Wang; L Shi; David K W Yeung; Edmund K Li; L S Tam Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Martin Libicher; C Kasperk; M Daniels-Wredenhagen; T Heye; H U Kauczor; P Nawroth; S Delorme; W Hosch Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Paraskevi E Kosta; Paraskevi V Voulgari; Anastasia K Zikou; Alexandros A Drosos; Maria I Argyropoulou Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2011-06-09 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Charlotte M Nusman; Cristina Lavini; Robert Hemke; Matthan W A Caan; Dieneke Schonenberg-Meinema; Koert M Dolman; Marion A J van Rossum; J Merlijn van den Berg; Taco W Kuijpers; Mario Maas Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2016-12-12
Authors: Christoph Treutlein; Tobias Bäuerle; Armin M Nagel; Ali Guermazi; Arnd Kleyer; David Simon; Georg Schett; Tobias Hepp; Michael Uder; Frank W Roemer Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 2.362