OBJECTIVE: To compare the assessment of wrist synovitis severity, synovial volume and synovial perfusion parameters on a dedicated low-field (0.25-T) to that of a high-field (3-T) whole-body MR system in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Twenty-one patients (mean age 50.0 ± 9.8 years) with active RA were recruited prospectively. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI examination of the most severely affected wrist was performed at both 0.25 T and 3 T. Three MRI-derived parameters, synovitis severity (RAMRIS grade), synovial volume (ml(3)) and synovial perfusion indices (maximum enhancement and enhancement slope), were compared. RESULTS: Comparing 0.25- and 3-T MRI, there was excellent agreement for semiquantitative assessment (r: 0.80, p < 0.00001) of synovitis (RAMRIS) as well as quantitative assessment (r: 0.94, p < 0.00001) of synovial volume. Good agreement for synovial Emax (r: 0.6, p = 0.002) and fair agreement (r: 0.5, p = 0.02) for synovial Eslope was found. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging of the RA wrist at 0.25 T yields excellent correlation with 3 T with regard to the synovitis activity score (RAMRIS) and synovial volume measurement. Fair to good correlation between low- (0.25-T) and high-field (3-T) MR systems was found for perfusion parameters, being better for Emax than for Eslope.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the assessment of wrist synovitis severity, synovial volume and synovial perfusion parameters on a dedicated low-field (0.25-T) to that of a high-field (3-T) whole-body MR system in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Twenty-one patients (mean age 50.0 ± 9.8 years) with active RA were recruited prospectively. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI examination of the most severely affected wrist was performed at both 0.25 T and 3 T. Three MRI-derived parameters, synovitis severity (RAMRIS grade), synovial volume (ml(3)) and synovial perfusion indices (maximum enhancement and enhancement slope), were compared. RESULTS: Comparing 0.25- and 3-T MRI, there was excellent agreement for semiquantitative assessment (r: 0.80, p < 0.00001) of synovitis (RAMRIS) as well as quantitative assessment (r: 0.94, p < 0.00001) of synovial volume. Good agreement for synovial Emax (r: 0.6, p = 0.002) and fair agreement (r: 0.5, p = 0.02) for synovial Eslope was found. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging of the RA wrist at 0.25 T yields excellent correlation with 3 T with regard to the synovitis activity score (RAMRIS) and synovial volume measurement. Fair to good correlation between low- (0.25-T) and high-field (3-T) MR systems was found for perfusion parameters, being better for Emax than for Eslope.
Authors: Daniel Aletaha; Tuhina Neogi; Alan J Silman; Julia Funovits; David T Felson; Clifton O Bingham; Neal S Birnbaum; Gerd R Burmester; Vivian P Bykerk; Marc D Cohen; Bernard Combe; Karen H Costenbader; Maxime Dougados; Paul Emery; Gianfranco Ferraccioli; Johanna M W Hazes; Kathryn Hobbs; Tom W J Huizinga; Arthur Kavanaugh; Jonathan Kay; Tore K Kvien; Timothy Laing; Philip Mease; Henri A Ménard; Larry W Moreland; Raymond L Naden; Theodore Pincus; Josef S Smolen; Ewa Stanislawska-Biernat; Deborah Symmons; Paul P Tak; Katherine S Upchurch; Jirí Vencovsky; Frederick Wolfe; Gillian Hawker Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Paul Bird; Bo Ejbjerg; Marissa Lassere; Mikkel Østergaard; Fiona McQueen; Charles Peterfy; Espen Haavardsholm; Philip O'Connor; Harry Genant; John Edmonds; Paul Emery; Philip G Conaghan Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Claudia Schirmer; Alexander K Scheel; Christian E Althoff; Tania Schink; Iris Eshed; Alexander Lembcke; Gerd-Rüdiger Burmester; Marina Backhaus; Bernd Hamm; Kay-Geert A Hermann Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2006-10-26 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Nathan White; Cooper Roddey; Ajit Shankaranarayanan; Eric Han; Dan Rettmann; Juan Santos; Josh Kuperman; Anders Dale Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: M B Axelsen; R P Poggenborg; M Stoltenberg; O Kubassova; M Boesen; K Hørslev-Petersen; H Bliddal; L G Hanson; M Østergaard Journal: Scand J Rheumatol Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Mikael Boesen; Mikkel Østergaard; Marco A Cimmino; Olga Kubassova; Karl Erik Jensen; Henning Bliddal Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 3.528