Literature DB >> 22678039

Interface micromechanics of transverse sections from retrieved cemented hip reconstructions: an experimental and finite element comparison.

Daan Waanders1, Dennis Janssen, Sanaz Berahmani, Mark A Miller, Kenneth A Mann, Nico Verdonschot.   

Abstract

In finite element analysis (FEA) models of cemented hip reconstructions, it is crucial to include the cement-bone interface mechanics. Recently, a micromechanical cohesive model was generated which reproduces the behavior of the cement-bone interface. The goal was to investigate whether this cohesive model was directly applicable on a macro level. From transverse sections of retrieved cemented hip reconstructions, two FEA-models were generated. The cement-bone interface was modeled with cohesive elements. A torque was applied and the cement-bone interface micromotions, global stiffness and stem translation were monitored. A sensitivity analysis was performed to investigate whether the cohesive model could be improved. All results were compared with experimental findings. That the original cohesive model resulted in a too compliant macromechanical response; the motions were too large and the global stiffness too small. When the cohesive model was modified, the match with the experimental response improved considerably.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22678039      PMCID: PMC3400762          DOI: 10.1007/s10856-012-4626-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  32 in total

1.  Tensile characteristics of ten commercial acrylic bone cements.

Authors:  E J Harper; W Bonfield
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-09

2.  Predicting the failure response of cement-bone constructs using a non-linear fracture mechanics approach.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; Leatha A Damron
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Comparison of failure characteristics of a range of cancellous bone-bone cement composites.

Authors:  P Lucksanasombool; W A J Higgs; M Ignat; R J E D Higgs; M V Swain
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 4.  Properties of acrylic bone cement: state of the art review.

Authors:  G Lewis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1997

5.  Is staircase walking a risk for the fixation of hip implants?

Authors:  G Bergmann; F Graichen; A Rohlmann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Mixed-mode failure response of the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  K A Mann; R Mocarski; L A Damron; M J Allen; D C Ayers
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Morphology based cohesive zone modeling of the cement-bone interface from postmortem retrievals.

Authors:  Daan Waanders; Dennis Janssen; Kenneth A Mann; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-05-13

8.  Application of circular statistics in the study of crack distribution around cemented femoral components.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; Sameer Gupta; Amos Race; Mark A Miller; Richard J Cleary
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Computer simulation on fatigue behavior of cemented hip prostheses: a physiological model.

Authors:  Jui-Pin Hung; Jian-Horng Chen; Hsiu-Lu Chiang; James Shih-Shyn Wu
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Periprosthetic bone loss after cemented total hip arthroplasty: a prospective 5-year dual energy radiographic absorptiometry study of 15 patients.

Authors:  Petri K Venesmaa; Heikki P J Kröger; Jukka S Jurvelin; Hannu J A Miettinen; Olavi T Suomalainen; Esko M Alhava
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2003-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Three-dimensional shape optimization of a cemented hip stem and experimental validations.

Authors:  Masaru Higa; Hiromasa Tanino; Ikuya Nishimura; Yoshinori Mitamura; Takeo Matsuno; Hiroshi Ito
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 1.731

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.