BACKGROUND: Although multiple echocardiographic methods exist to calculate cardiac output (CO), they have not been validated in mice using a reference method. METHODS: Echocardiographic and flow probe measurements of CO were obtained in mice before and after albumin infusion and inferior vena cava occlusions. Echocardiography was also performed before and after endotoxin injection. Cardiac output was calculated using left ventricular volumes obtained from an M-mode or a two-dimensional view, left ventricular stroke volume calculated using the pulmonary flow, or estimated by the measurement of pulmonary velocity time integral (VTI). RESULTS: Close correlations were demonstrated between flow probe-measured CO and all echocardiographic measurements of CO. All echocardiographic-derived CO overestimated the flow probe-measured CO. Two-dimensional image-derived CO was associated with the smallest overestimation of CO. Interobserver variability was lowest for pulmonary VTI-derived CO. CONCLUSION: In mice, CO calculated from two-dimensional parasternal long-axis images is most accurate when compared with flow probe measurements; however, pulmonary VTI-derived CO is subject to less variability.
BACKGROUND: Although multiple echocardiographic methods exist to calculate cardiac output (CO), they have not been validated in mice using a reference method. METHODS: Echocardiographic and flow probe measurements of CO were obtained in mice before and after albumin infusion and inferior vena cava occlusions. Echocardiography was also performed before and after endotoxin injection. Cardiac output was calculated using left ventricular volumes obtained from an M-mode or a two-dimensional view, left ventricular stroke volume calculated using the pulmonary flow, or estimated by the measurement of pulmonary velocity time integral (VTI). RESULTS: Close correlations were demonstrated between flow probe-measured CO and all echocardiographic measurements of CO. All echocardiographic-derived CO overestimated the flow probe-measured CO. Two-dimensional image-derived CO was associated with the smallest overestimation of CO. Interobserver variability was lowest for pulmonary VTI-derived CO. CONCLUSION: In mice, CO calculated from two-dimensional parasternal long-axis images is most accurate when compared with flow probe measurements; however, pulmonary VTI-derived CO is subject to less variability.
Authors: W Steudel; F Ichinose; P L Huang; W E Hurford; R C Jones; J A Bevan; M C Fishman; W M Zapol Journal: Circ Res Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: F S Foster; M Y Zhang; Y Q Zhou; G Liu; J Mehi; E Cherin; K A Harasiewicz; B G Starkoski; L Zan; D A Knapik; S L Adamson Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: M Scherrer-Crosbie; W Steudel; P R Hunziker; G P Foster; L Garrido; N Liel-Cohen; W M Zapol; M H Picard Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-09-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M D Feldman; J M Erikson; Y Mao; C E Korcarz; R M Lang; G L Freeman Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Lowell H Frank; Qing Yu; Richard Francis; Xin Tian; Rajeev Samtani; David J Sahn; Linda Leatherbury; Cecilia W Lo Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2010-01-25 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Ben J A Janssen; Tijl De Celle; Jacques J M Debets; Agnieszka E Brouns; Michael F Callahan; Thomas L Smith Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2004-05-20 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: David M Baron; Maeva Clerte; Peter Brouckaert; Michael J Raher; Aidan W Flynn; Haihua Zhang; Edward A Carter; Michael H Picard; Kenneth D Bloch; Emmanuel S Buys; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-07-09 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Janet R Manning; Catherine N Withers; Bryana Levitan; Jeffrey D Smith; Douglas A Andres; Jonathan Satin Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Ken Y Chan; Nicholas C Flytzanis; Bin Yang; Jennifer B Treweek; Benjamin E Deverman; Alon Greenbaum; Antti Lignell; Cheng Xiao; Long Cai; Mark S Ladinsky; Pamela J Bjorkman; Charless C Fowlkes; Viviana Gradinaru Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Maëva Clerte; David M Baron; Peter Brouckaert; Laura Ernande; Michael J Raher; Aidan W Flynn; Michael H Picard; Kenneth D Bloch; Emmanuel S Buys; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Elisabet Domínguez; Jesús Ruberte; José Ríos; Rosa Novellas; Maria Montserrat Rivera Del Alamo; Marc Navarro; Yvonne Espada Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Jakob Körbelin; Timo Sieber; Stefan Michelfelder; Lars Lunding; Elmar Spies; Agnes Hunger; Malik Alawi; Kleopatra Rapti; Daniela Indenbirken; Oliver J Müller; Renata Pasqualini; Wadih Arap; Jürgen A Kleinschmidt; Martin Trepel Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 11.454