BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Propranolol is a vasoactive drug that shows antiangiogenic and antitumour activities in melanoma. However, it is unknown whether these activities are dose-dependent and whether there is a relationship between systemic vascular effects of propranolol and anti-melanoma activity. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Effects of increasing doses of propranolol (10, 20, 30 and 40 mg·kg-1 ·day-1 ) on tumour growth were studied in B16F10 melanoma-bearing mice. Histological and biochemical analyses were used to assess propranolol effects on angiogenesis and cancer cell proliferation. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was evaluated by measuring cardiac output and arterial BP. KEY RESULTS: In vitro analyses revealed that B16F10 cells expressed β-adrenoceptors, but neither isoprenaline, a β-adrenoceptor agonist, nor the β-blocker propranolol affected cancer cell proliferation. In vivo studies showed that the antitumour efficacy of propranolol follows a U-shaped biphasic dose-response curve. Low doses (10 and 20 mg·kg-1 ·day-1 ) significantly inhibit tumour growth, whereas higher doses are progressively less effective. We also found that high-dose propranolol stimulates tumour arteriogenesis whereas no effect on angiogenesis was observed at any dose. Based on these data and considering that propranolol is a vasoactive drug, we hypothesized that it causes systemic vasoconstriction or vasodilation depending on the dose and thus alters tumour perfusion and growth. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that propranolol has a biphasic effect on SVR with low and high doses producing vasoconstriction and vasodilation respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Propranolol inhibits melanoma growth in a U-shaped biphasic manner. A direct relationship exists between SVR and anti-melanoma activity.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Propranolol is a vasoactive drug that shows antiangiogenic and antitumour activities in melanoma. However, it is unknown whether these activities are dose-dependent and whether there is a relationship between systemic vascular effects of propranolol and anti-melanoma activity. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Effects of increasing doses of propranolol (10, 20, 30 and 40 mg·kg-1 ·day-1 ) on tumour growth were studied in B16F10 melanoma-bearing mice. Histological and biochemical analyses were used to assess propranolol effects on angiogenesis and cancer cell proliferation. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was evaluated by measuring cardiac output and arterial BP. KEY RESULTS: In vitro analyses revealed that B16F10 cells expressed β-adrenoceptors, but neither isoprenaline, a β-adrenoceptor agonist, nor the β-blocker propranolol affected cancer cell proliferation. In vivo studies showed that the antitumour efficacy of propranolol follows a U-shaped biphasic dose-response curve. Low doses (10 and 20 mg·kg-1 ·day-1 ) significantly inhibit tumour growth, whereas higher doses are progressively less effective. We also found that high-dose propranolol stimulates tumour arteriogenesis whereas no effect on angiogenesis was observed at any dose. Based on these data and considering that propranolol is a vasoactive drug, we hypothesized that it causes systemic vasoconstriction or vasodilation depending on the dose and thus alters tumour perfusion and growth. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that propranolol has a biphasic effect on SVR with low and high doses producing vasoconstriction and vasodilation respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Propranolol inhibits melanoma growth in a U-shaped biphasic manner. A direct relationship exists between SVR and anti-melanoma activity.
Authors: Jing Chen; Jean-Sebastian Joyal; Colman J Hatton; Aimee M Juan; Dorothy T Pei; Christian G Hurst; Dan Xu; Andreas Stahl; Ann Hellstrom; Lois E H Smith Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Matthew M Bingham; Babette Saltzman; Nghia-Jack Vo; Jonathan A Perkins Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Long P Nguyen; Rui Lin; Sergio Parra; Ozozoma Omoluabi; Nicola A Hanania; Michael J Tuvim; Brian J Knoll; Burton F Dickey; Richard A Bond Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-01-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ine Vandersmissen; Sander Craps; Maarten Depypere; Giulia Coppiello; Nick van Gastel; Frederik Maes; Geert Carmeliet; Jan Schrooten; Elizabeth A V Jones; Lieve Umans; Roland Devlieger; Michel Koole; Olivier Gheysens; An Zwijsen; Xabier L Aranguren; Aernout Luttun Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Qi Xu; Nicole L Jennings; Kenneth Sim; Lisa Chang; Xiao-Ming Gao; Helen Kiriazis; Ying Ying Lee; My-Nhan Nguyen; Elizabeth A Woodcock; You-Yi Zhang; Assam El-Osta; Anthony M Dart; Xiao-Jun Du Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2015-03
Authors: Christopher Southan; Joanna L Sharman; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Stephen P H Alexander; O Peter Buneman; Anthony P Davenport; John C McGrath; John A Peters; Michael Spedding; William A Catterall; Doriano Fabbro; Jamie A Davies Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Kayla J Steinberger; Michael T Bailey; Amy C Gross; Laura A Sumner; Jeffrey L Voorhees; Nisha Crouser; Jennifer M Curry; Yijie Wang; A Courtney DeVries; Clay B Marsh; Ronald Glaser; Eric V Yang; Timothy D Eubank Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2020-06-09
Authors: Laura Brohée; Olivier Peulen; Betty Nusgens; Vincent Castronovo; Marc Thiry; Alain C Colige; Christophe F Deroanne Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 4.379