Literature DB >> 21309020

Can we reduce the number of fish in the OECD acute toxicity test?

Hans Rufli1, Timothy A Springer.   

Abstract

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) Guideline 203, Fish Acute Toxicity Test, states that the test should be performed using at least five concentrations in a geometric series with a separation factor not exceeding 2.2, with at least seven fish per concentration. However, the efficiency of this design can be questioned, because it often results in only one concentration that causes partial mortality (mortality >0% and <100%). We performed Monte Carlo computer simulations to assess whether more efficient designs could allow reductions in fish use. Simulations indicated that testing with six fish per concentration could yield 50% lethal concentration (LC50) estimates of quality similar to those obtained using seven fish. Experts attending a workshop organized to consider this finding and to identify the best methods for reducing fish use concluded that significant reductions could best be achieved by modifying the test paradigm. They suggested initiating testing using a 96-h fish embryo test instead of juvenile fish to cover the range from the upper threshold concentration (the lowest 50% effective concentration [EC50] in existing algae and daphnia studies) to the highest concentration with no mortality. This would be followed by a confirmatory limit test with juvenile fish at the highest concentration with no mortality or by a full test with juvenile fish, if a point estimate of the LC50 is required.
Copyright © 2011 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21309020     DOI: 10.1002/etc.465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  3 in total

1.  Reconsidering sufficient and optimal test design in acute toxicity testing.

Authors:  Tjalling Jager
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: what are the big questions?

Authors:  Alistair B A Boxall; Murray A Rudd; Bryan W Brooks; Daniel J Caldwell; Kyungho Choi; Silke Hickmann; Elizabeth Innes; Kim Ostapyk; Jane P Staveley; Tim Verslycke; Gerald T Ankley; Karen F Beazley; Scott E Belanger; Jason P Berninger; Pedro Carriquiriborde; Anja Coors; Paul C Deleo; Scott D Dyer; Jon F Ericson; François Gagné; John P Giesy; Todd Gouin; Lars Hallstrom; Maja V Karlsson; D G Joakim Larsson; James M Lazorchak; Frank Mastrocco; Alison McLaughlin; Mark E McMaster; Roger D Meyerhoff; Roberta Moore; Joanne L Parrott; Jason R Snape; Richard Murray-Smith; Mark R Servos; Paul K Sibley; Jürg Oliver Straub; Nora D Szabo; Edward Topp; Gerald R Tetreault; Vance L Trudeau; Glen Van Der Kraak
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Key Opportunities to Replace, Reduce, and Refine Regulatory Fish Acute Toxicity Tests.

Authors:  Natalie Burden; Rachel Benstead; Kate Benyon; Mark Clook; Christopher Green; John Handley; Neil Harper; Samuel K Maynard; Chris Mead; Audrey Pearson; Kathryn Ryder; Dave Sheahan; Roger van Egmond; James R Wheeler; Thomas H Hutchinson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.742

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.