Literature DB >> 32681761

Key Opportunities to Replace, Reduce, and Refine Regulatory Fish Acute Toxicity Tests.

Natalie Burden1, Rachel Benstead2, Kate Benyon3, Mark Clook4, Christopher Green5, John Handley6, Neil Harper7, Samuel K Maynard8, Chris Mead9, Audrey Pearson10, Kathryn Ryder11, Dave Sheahan12, Roger van Egmond13, James R Wheeler14, Thomas H Hutchinson15.   

Abstract

Fish acute toxicity tests are conducted as part of regulatory hazard identification and risk-assessment packages for industrial chemicals and plant protection products. The aim of these tests is to determine the concentration which would be lethal to 50% of the animals treated. These tests are therefore associated with suffering in the test animals, and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development test guideline 203 (fish, acute toxicity) studies are the most widely conducted regulatory vertebrate ecotoxicology tests for prospective chemical safety assessment. There is great scope to apply the 3Rs principles-the reduction, refinement, and replacement of animals-in this area of testing. An expert ecotoxicology working group, led by the UK National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research, including members from government, academia, and industry, reviewed global fish acute test data requirements for the major chemical sectors. The present study highlights ongoing initiatives and provides an overview of the key challenges and opportunities associated with replacing, reducing, and/or refining fish acute toxicity studies-without compromising environmental protection. Environ Toxicol Chem 2020;39:2076-2089.
© 2020 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. © 2020 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic toxicology; Chemical regulation; Ecotoxicology; Hazard/risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32681761      PMCID: PMC7754335          DOI: 10.1002/etc.4824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  46 in total

1.  Can saltwater toxicity be predicted from freshwater data?

Authors:  K M Leung; D Morritt; J R Wheeler; P Whitehouse; N Sorokin; R Toy; M Holt; M Crane
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  CRED: Criteria for reporting and evaluating ecotoxicity data.

Authors:  Caroline T A Moermond; Robert Kase; Muris Korkaric; Marlene Ågerstrand
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Lorraine Maltby; Naomi Blake; Theo C M Brock; Paul J van den Brink
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Are acute and chronic saltwater fish studies required for plant protection and biocidal product active substance risk assessment?

Authors:  James R Wheeler; Samuel K Maynard; Mark Crane
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Reducing repetition of regulatory vertebrate ecotoxicology studies.

Authors:  Natalie Burden; Nichola Gellatly; Rachel Benstead; Kate Benyon; T Michelle Blickley; Mark Clook; Ian Doyle; Peter Edwards; John Handley; Ioanna Katsiadaki; Adam Lillicrap; Chris Mead; Kathy Ryder; Edward Salinas; James Wheeler; Thomas H Hutchinson
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.992

6.  Accurate prediction of acute fish toxicity of fragrance chemicals with the RTgill-W1 cell assay.

Authors:  Andreas Natsch; Heike Laue; Tina Haupt; Valentin von Niederhäusern; Gordon Sanders
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  Comparative analysis of 3D culture methods on human HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Claudia Luckert; Christina Schulz; Nadja Lehmann; Maria Thomas; Ute Hofmann; Seddik Hammad; Jan G Hengstler; Albert Braeuning; Alfonso Lampen; Stefanie Hessel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Interspecies correlation estimates predict protective environmental concentrations.

Authors:  Scott D Dyer; Donald J Versteeg; Scott E Belanger; Joel G Chaney; Foster L Mayer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Aquatic toxicity of the macrolide antibiotic clarithromycin and its metabolites.

Authors:  Michaela Baumann; Klaus Weiss; Dirk Maletzki; Walter Schüssler; Dieter Schudoma; Willi Kopf; Ute Kühnen
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Editor's Highlight: Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility (SeqAPASS): A Web-Based Tool for Addressing the Challenges of Cross-Species Extrapolation of Chemical Toxicity.

Authors:  Carlie A LaLone; Daniel L Villeneuve; David Lyons; Henry W Helgen; Serina L Robinson; Joseph A Swintek; Travis W Saari; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.849

View more
  2 in total

1.  Recapitulation of Retinal Damage in Zebrafish Larvae Infected with Zika Virus.

Authors:  Adolfo Luis Almeida Maleski; Joao Gabriel Santos Rosa; Jefferson Thiago Gonçalves Bernardo; Renato Mancini Astray; Cristiani Isabel Banderó Walker; Monica Lopes-Ferreira; Carla Lima
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 2.  A Critical Review of the Availability, Reliability, and Ecological Relevance of Arctic Species Toxicity Tests for Use in Environmental Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Rebecca J Eldridge; Benjamin P de Jourdan; Mark L Hanson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 4.218

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.