Literature DB >> 21306713

Effects of attachment position and shoulder orientation during calibration on the accuracy of the acromial tracker.

A F Shaheen1, C M Alexander, A M J Bull.   

Abstract

The acromial tracker is used to measure scapular rotations during dynamic movements. The method has low accuracy in high elevations and is sensitive to its attachment location on the acromion. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the attachment position and shoulder orientation during calibration on the tracker accuracy. The tracker was attached to one of three positions: near the anterior edge of the acromion process, just above the acromial angle and the meeting point between the acromion and the scapular spine. The scapula locator was used to track the scapula during bilateral abduction simultaneously. The locator was used to calibrate the tracker at: no abduction, 30°, 60°, 90° and 120° humerothoracic abduction. ANOVA tests compared RMS errors for different attachment positions and calibration angles. The results showed that attaching the device at the meeting point between the acromion and the scapular spine gave the smallest errors and it was best to calibrate the device at 60° for elevations ≤90°, at 120° for elevations >90° and at 90°or 120° for the full range of abduction. The accuracy of the tracker is significantly improved if attached appropriately and calibrated for the range of movement being measured.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21306713     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  10 in total

Review 1.  Collecting shoulder kinematics with electromagnetic tracking systems and digital inclinometers: A review.

Authors:  Daniel C Hannah; Jason S Scibek
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-18

2.  Intra-protocol repeatability and inter-protocol agreement for the analysis of scapulo-humeral coordination.

Authors:  I Parel; A G Cutti; A Kraszewski; G Verni; H Hillstrom; A Kontaxis
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Measurement of dynamic scapular kinematics using an acromion marker cluster to minimize skin movement artifact.

Authors:  Martin B Warner; Paul H Chappell; Maria J Stokes
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Shoulder and thorax kinematics contribute to increased power output of competitive handcyclists.

Authors:  Benjamin Stone; Barry S Mason; Martin B Warner; Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Characteristics of the scapula movement during shoulder elevation depend on posture.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Yabata; Tsutomu Fukui
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2022-07-01

6.  Three-Dimensional Quantitative Evaluation of the Scapular Skin Marker Movements in the Upright Posture.

Authors:  Yuki Yoshida; Noboru Matsumura; Yoshitake Yamada; Minoru Yamada; Yoichi Yokoyama; Azusa Miyamoto; Masaya Nakamura; Takeo Nagura; Masahiro Jinzaki
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Scaling and kinematics optimisation of the scapula and thorax in upper limb musculoskeletal models.

Authors:  Joe A I Prinold; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The centre of rotation of the shoulder complex and the effect of normalisation.

Authors:  Celia Amabile; Anthony M J Bull; Angela E Kedgley
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Scapula kinematics of pull-up techniques: Avoiding impingement risk with training changes.

Authors:  Joe A I Prinold; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.319

10.  Analysis of shoulder compressive and shear forces during functional activities of daily life.

Authors:  Christian Klemt; Joe A Prinold; Sharon Morgans; Samuel H L Smith; Daniel Nolte; Peter Reilly; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.063

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.