Literature DB >> 21306470

Sonobreast: predicting individualized probabilities of malignancy in solid breast masses with echographic expression.

Régis Resende Paulinelli1, Ruffo Freitas-Junior, Clécio Ênio Murta de Lucena, Marise Amaral Rebouças Moreira, Vardeli Alves de Moraes, Júlio Roberto Macedo Bernardes-Júnior, Célio da Silva Rocha Vidal, Alessandro Naldi Ruiz, Miliana Tostes Lucato, Nayara Gomes Silveira da Costa, Danilo Augusto Teixeira.   

Abstract

To create an individualized predictive tool for the risk of malignancy in solid breast masses, based on echographic and clinical characteristics. Research Ethics Committee approval and informed consent were obtained. This multi-center study included 1,403 solid breast masses prospectively. Each ultrasound feature was analyzed and compared with the definitive diagnosis. The ultrasound results, women's ages and family histories of breast cancer were included in a multivariate logistic regression model. Among the 1,403 lesions included in the study, 1,390 (99.1%) had a conclusive diagnosis: 343 malignant tumors (24.7%), and 1,047 benign masses (75.3%). The odds ratio (and confidence interval) for breast malignancy for each variable included in the model, as calculated by multivariate analysis, were as follows: irregular shape/noncircumscribed margins, 16.02 (7.75-33.09); heterogeneous echo texture, 4.50 (2.42-8.23); vertical orientation (not parallel to the skin), 2.23 (1.04-4.75); anterior echogenic rim, 2.62 (1.09-6.31); posterior shadowing, 2.38 (1.23-4.62); age more than 40 years, 2.19 (1.26-3.81); positive first-degree family history (mother, sister or daughter), 7.50 (2.65-21.18). There was no advantage in including the presence of internal vascularity, presence of thickened Cooper's ligaments or size of the mass, in the model. The predictive tool was named SONOBREAST and it is freely available for medical purposes on the internet site: http://www.sonobreast.com. The probability of malignancy in breast masses can be specified based on their ultrasound features, the woman's age and the family history of breast cancer.
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21306470     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.01046.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  8 in total

1.  Can Cut-Off-Values for Tumor Size or Patient Age in Breast Ultrasound Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies or is it all About Bi-rads?- A Retrospective Analysis of 763 Biopsied T1-Sized Lesions.

Authors:  Laura Holzer-Fruehwald; Matthias Meissnitzer; Michael Weber; Stephan Holzer; Klaus Hergan; Christian Weismann
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2017-09-01

2.  B-mode ultrasound examination of canine mammary gland neoplastic lesions of small size (diameter < 2 cm).

Authors:  Iacopo Vannozzi; Matteo Tesi; Marta Zangheri; Viola Maria Innocenti; Alessandra Rota; Simonetta Citi; Alessandro Poli
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.578

4.  Identification of the lymph node metastasis-related automated breast volume scanning features for predicting axillary lymph node tumor burden of invasive breast cancer via a clinical prediction model.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Changjing Cai; Menghan Liu; Jidong Xiao
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 6.055

5.  Strain and Shear-Wave Elastography and Their Relationship to Histopathological Features of Canine Mammary Nodular Lesions.

Authors:  Marcella Massimini; Alessia Gloria; Mariarita Romanucci; Leonardo Della Salda; Lucia Di Francesco; Alberto Contri
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-09-15

6.  Sonography with vertical orientation feature predicts worse disease outcome in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Haoyu Wang; Weiwei Zhan; Weiguo Chen; Yafen Li; Xiaosong Chen; Kunwei Shen
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.380

7.  Association of sonographic features and molecular subtypes in predicting breast cancer disease outcomes.

Authors:  Haoyu Wang; Jiejie Yao; Ying Zhu; Weiwei Zhan; Xiaosong Chen; Kunwei Shen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Breast lesions excised via vacuum-assisted system: could we get any clues for B3 lesions before excision biopsy?

Authors:  Liang Zheng; Fufu Zheng; Zhaomin Xing; Yunjian Zhang; Yongxin Li; Hongbiao Xu; Yuanhui Lai; Jie Li; Wenjian Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.