Literature DB >> 21304743

Complete genome sequence of Spirochaeta smaragdinae type strain (SEBR 4228).

Konstantinos Mavromatis, Montri Yasawong, Olga Chertkov, Alla Lapidus, Susan Lucas, Matt Nolan, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Natalia Ivanova, Roxanne Tapia, Cliff Han, David Bruce, Lynne Goodwin, Amrita Pati, Ami Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, John C Detter, Manfred Rohde, Evelyne Brambilla, Stefan Spring, Markus Göker, Johannes Sikorski, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Hans-Peter Klenk, Nikos C Kyrpides.   

Abstract

Spirochaeta smaragdinae Magot et al. 1998 belongs to the family Spirochaetaceae. The species is Gram-negative, motile, obligately halophilic and strictly anaerobic and is of interest because it is able to ferment numerous polysaccharides. S. smaragdinae is the only species of the family Spirochaetaceae known to reduce thiosulfate or element sulfur to sulfide. This is the first complete genome sequence in the family Spirochaetaceae. The 4,653,970 bp long genome with its 4,363 protein-coding and 57 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GEBA; Spirochaetaceae; chemoorganotroph; corkscrew-like motility; obligately halophile; rhodanese-like protein; spiral shaped; strictly anaerobe

Year:  2010        PMID: 21304743      PMCID: PMC3035371          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1143106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain SEBR 4228T (= DSM 11293 = JCM 15392) is the type strain of the species Spirochaeta smaragdinae. Currently, there are eighteen species [1] and two subspecies in the genus Spirochaeta [1,2]. The generic name derives from the Greek word ‘speira’ meaning ‘a coil’ and the Greek word ‘chaitê’ meaning ‘hair’, referring to the spiral shape of bacterial cell. The species epithet is derived from the Latin word ‘smaragdinae’ meaning ‘from Emerald’, referring to the name Emerald of an oil field in Congo. Strain SEBR 4228T was isolated from an oil-injection production water sample of a Congo offshore oilfield [3] and described in 1997 by Magot et al. as ‘Spirochaeta smaragdinae’ [3]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for S. smaragdinae SEBR 4228T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

Strain SEBR 4228T shares 82.2-99.0% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity with the type strains from the other members of genus Spirochaeta [4], with the type strain of S. bajacaliforniensis [5], isolated from a mud sample in Laguna Figueroa (Baja California, Mexico) showing the highest degree of sequence similarity (99%). Notwithstanding the high degree of 16S rRNA gene sequence identity, these two strains are characterized by low genomic similarity (38%) in DNA-DNA hybridization studies and differ by numerous differences in carbon source utilization [3]. Several type strains from the genus Treponema show the highest degree of similarity for non-Spirochaeta strains (82.9-83.6%) [4]. A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of strain SEBR 4228T was compared using BLAST with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [6] and the relative frequencies of taxa and keywords, weighted by BLAST scores, were determined. The three most frequent genera were Spirochaeta (76.4%), ‘Sphaerochaeta’ (15.8%) and Cytophaga (7.8%). Within the five most frequent keywords in the labels of environmental samples were 'microbial' (11.7%), 'mat' (10.5%), 'hypersaline' (7.7%), and 'sediment' (1.7%). The environmental samples database (env_nt) contains the marine metagenome genomic clone 1061006082084 (EK988302) that is 92% identical to the 16S rRNA gene sequence of SEBR 4228T. No phylotypes from genomic surveys could be linked to the species S. smaragdinae or even the genus Spirochaeta, indicating a rather rare occurrence of these in the habitats screened so far (as of August 2010). Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of S. smaragdinae SEBR 4228T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the two 16S rRNA gene copies differ from each other by up to one nucleotide, and differ by up to five nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence generated from DSM 11293 (U80597), which contains two ambiguous base calls.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of S. smaragdinae SEBR 4228T relative to the type strains of the other species within the genus and of the other genera within the genus Spirochaeta. The tree was inferred from 1,385 aligned characters [7,8] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [9] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy [10]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 500 bootstrap replicates [11] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [12] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of S. smaragdinae SEBR 4228T relative to the type strains of the other species within the genus and of the other genera within the genus Spirochaeta. The tree was inferred from 1,385 aligned characters [7,8] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [9] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy [10]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 500 bootstrap replicates [11] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [12] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold. Strain SEBR 4228T is a Gram-negative, chemoorganotrophic and strictly anaerobic bacterium with spiral shaped, 0.3-0.5 × 5-30 μm long cells (Figure 2 and Table 1). It possesses a multilayer, crenulating, Gram-negative cell envelope, which consists of an outer membrane and an inner membrane adjoining the cytoplasmic membrane [3]. Sillons, which are the contact point between the protoplasmic cylinder, the inner membrane and the outer membrane, are also observed from the cells of S. smaragdinae SEBR 4228T [3]. Strain SEBR 4228T forms translucent colonies with regular edges (0.5 mm of diameter) after two weeks of incubation on SEM agar plates at 37°C [3]. The strain is motile with a corkscrew-like motion, which is characteristic for the typical 1-2-1 periplasmic flagellar arrangement of the members of the genus Spirochaeta [3]. The periplasmic, non-extracellular location of the flagella make the Spirochaeta a valuable candidate for the study of flagella evolution [26]. The enlarged spherical bodies, which are typical for spirochetes, are also observed in strain SEBR 4228T [3]. The temperature range for growth is from 20°C to 40°C, with an optimum temperature at 37°C [3]. The pH range for growth is between 5.5 and 8.0, with an optimum pH of 7.0 [3]. Strain SEBR 4228T is obligately halophilic [3] and is able to grow on media that contains 1-10% of NaCl, with an optimum salinity at 5% NaCl [3]. Under optimum growth conditions, the doubling time is approximately 25 h in the presence of glucose and thiosulfate [3]. Strain SEBR 4228T is able to utilize biotrypcase, fructose, fumarate, galactose, D-glucose, glycerol, mannitol, mannose, ribose, D-xylose and yeast extract, but not acetate, D-arabinose, butyrate, casamino acids, lactate, maltose, propionate, pyruvate, rhamnose, sorbose, sucrose and L-xylose [3]. Yeast extract is required for growth and cannot be replaced by a vitamin mixture [3]. Strain SEBR 4228T ferments fumarate to acetate and succinate [3]. The major end-product of glucose fermentation of strain SEBR 4228T is lactate with traces of H2 and ethanol [3]. S. smaragdinae is the only species of Spirochaeta known to reduce thiosulfate or elemental sulfur to sulfide [3]. Strain SEBR 4228T produces lactate, acetate, CO2 and H2S as the end-products of glucose oxidation when thiosulfate is present in the growth medium [3]. The strain contains a rhodanese-like protein which expresses rhodanese activity [27]. This enzyme is able to reduce thiosulfate to sulfide [28]. Rhodanese is also widely found in other members of the domain Bacteria [29-31].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of S. smaragdinae SEBR 4228T

Table 1

Classification and general features of S. smaragdinae SEBR 4228T according to the MIGS recommendations [13].

MIGS ID   Property   Term    Evidence code
   Current classification   Domain Bacteria    TAS [14]
   Phylum Spirochaetae    TAS [15,16]
   Class Spirochaetes    TAS [16]
   Order Spirochaetales    TAS [17,18]
   Family Spirochaetaceae    TAS [18,19]
   Genus Spirochaeta    TAS [18,20-22]
   Species Spirochaeta smaragdinae    TAS [3,23]
   Type strain SEBR 4228    TAS [3]
   Gram stain   negative    TAS [3]
   Cell shape   spiral    TAS [3]
   Motility   yes    TAS [3]
   Sporulation   none    NAS
   Temperature range   between 20°C and over 40°C    TAS [3]
   Optimum temperature   37°C    TAS [3]
   Salinity   1-10% NaCl (optimum 5%)    TAS [3]
MIGS-22   Oxygen requirement   obligately anaerobic    TAS [3]
   Carbon source   polysaccharides    TAS [3]
   Energy source   chemoorganotroph    TAS [3]
MIGS-6   Habitat   oil-fields    TAS [3]
MIGS-15   Biotic relationship   free-living    TAS [3]
MIGS-14   Pathogenicity   none    NAS
   Biosafety level   1    TAS [24]
   Isolation   oil-injection water sample in the   production system of an oil field    TAS [3]
MIGS-4   Geographic location   Emerald oil fields in Congo    TAS [3]
MIGS-5   Sample collection time   1997 or before    TAS [3]
MIGS-4.1   Latitude   not reported
MIGS-4.2   Longitude   not reported
MIGS-4.3   Depth   not reported
MIGS-4.4   Altitude   not reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [25]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements

Scanning electron micrograph of S. smaragdinae SEBR 4228T Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [25]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements

Chemotaxonomy

No cellular fatty acids profiles are currently available for S. smaragdinae SEBR 4228T. However, C16:0 dimethyl acetate is the major cellular fatty acids of the type strains of the closely related S. dissipatitropha, S. asiatica and S. americana, and C16:0 fatty acid methyl ester is the major cellular fatty acids of S. africana [20,32].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [33], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [34]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [12] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID   Property   Term
MIGS-31   Finishing quality   Finished
MIGS-28   Libraries used   Three genomic libraries:   454 pyrosequence standard and   PE (12 kb insert size) libraries and one   Illumina standard library
MIGS-29   Sequencing platforms   454 GS FLX Titanium, Illumina GAii
MIGS-31.2   Sequencing coverage   58.8 × pyrosequence, 6.9 × Illumina
MIGS-30   Assemblers   Newbler version 2.0.0-PostRelease-   11/04/2008, phrap,
MIGS-32   Gene calling method   Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
   INSDC ID   CP002116
   Genbank Date of Release   August 6, 2010
   GOLD ID   Gc013354
   NCBI project ID   32637
   Database: IMG-GEBA   2503128010
MIGS-13   Source material identifier   DSM 11293
   Project relevance   Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

S. smaragdinae SEBR 4228T, DSM 11293, was grown anaerobically in medium 819 (Spirochaeta smaragdinae medium) [35] at 35°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using MasterPure Gram Positive DNA Purification Kit (Epicentre MGP04100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer, with modification st/LALMice for cell lysis as described in Wu et al. [34].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/). Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 2.0.0-PostRelease-11/04/2008 (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisted of 51 contigs in one scaffold was converted into a phrap assembly by making fake reads from the consensus, collecting the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data was assembled with Velvet [36] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. Draft assemblies were based on 273 Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package (www.phrap.com) was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the following finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/), Dupfinisher, or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI) [37]. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F.Chang, unpublished). A total of 147 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to improve the final consensus quality using an in-house developed tool - the Polisher [38]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is 0.2 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 65.7× coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [39] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [40]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [41].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 4,653,970 bp long chromosome with a 49.0% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 4,363 genes predicted, 4,306 were protein-coding genes, and 57 RNAs; eighty seven pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (74.2%) were assigned with a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute   Value   % of Total
Genome size (bp)   4,653,970   100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)   4,315,215   92.97%
DNA G+C content (bp)   2,278,823   48.97%
Number of replicons   1
Extrachromosomal elements   0
Total genes   4,363   100.00%
RNA genes   57   1.31%
rRNA operons   2
Protein-coding genes   4306   98.69%
Pseudo genes   87   1.99%
Genes with function prediction   3,235   74.15%
Genes in paralog clusters   818   18.75%
Genes assigned to COGs   3,318   76.05%
Genes assigned Pfam domains   3,443   78.91%
Genes with signal peptides   871   26.36%
Genes with transmembrane helices   1,150   22.45%
CRISPR repeats   1
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code   Value  %age    Description
J   159  4.3    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A   0  0.0    RNA processing and modification
K   328  8.8    Transcription
L   129  3.5    Replication, recombination and repair
B   1  0.0    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D   25  0.7    Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y   0  0.0    Nuclear structure
V   58  1.6    Defense mechanisms
T   321  8.6    Signal transduction mechanisms
M   183  4.9    Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N   94  2.5    Cell motility
Z   0  0.0    Cytoskeleton
W   0  0.0    Extracellular structures
U   58  1.6    Intracellular trafficking and secretion, and vesicular transport
O   114  3.1    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C   223  6.0    Energy production and conversion
G   553  14.9    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   326  8.8    Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   96  2.6    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   130  3.5    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   61  1.6    Lipid transport and metabolism
P   165  4.4    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   30  0.8    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R   450  12.1    General function prediction only
S   212  5.7    Function unknown
-   1,045  23.9    Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  30 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Spirochaeta bajacaliforniensis sp. n. from a microbial mat community at Laguna Figueroa, Baja California Norte, Mexico.

Authors:  S P Fracek; J F Stolz
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.552

3.  Dethiosulfovibrio peptidovorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a new anaerobic, slightly halophilic, thiosulfate-reducing bacterium from corroding offshore oil wells.

Authors:  M Magot; G Ravot; X Campaignolle; B Ollivier; B K Patel; M L Fardeau; P Thomas; J L Crolet; J L Garcia
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1997-07

4.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Improved Assay for Rhodanese in Thiobacillus spp.

Authors:  D R Singleton; D W Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  List of Bacterial Names with Standing in Nomenclature: a folder available on the Internet.

Authors:  J P Euzéby
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1997-04

9.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Spirochaeta americana sp. nov., a new haloalkaliphilic, obligately anaerobic spirochaete isolated from soda Mono Lake in California.

Authors:  Richard B Hoover; Elena V Pikuta; Asim K Bej; Damien Marsic; William B Whitman; Jane Tang; Paul Krader
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.747

View more
  10 in total

1.  A Noncanonical Metal Center Drives the Activity of the Sediminispirochaeta smaragdinae Metallo-β-lactamase SPS-1.

Authors:  Zishuo Cheng; Jamie VanPelt; Alexander Bergstrom; Christopher Bethel; Andrew Katko; Callie Miller; Kelly Mason; Erin Cumming; Huan Zhang; Robert L Kimble; Sarah Fullington; Stacey Lowery Bretz; Jay C Nix; Robert A Bonomo; David L Tierney; Richard C Page; Michael W Crowder
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Complete genome sequence of the termite hindgut bacterium Spirochaeta coccoides type strain (SPN1(T)), reclassification in the genus Sphaerochaeta as Sphaerochaeta coccoides comb. nov. and emendations of the family Spirochaetaceae and the genus Sphaerochaeta.

Authors:  Birte Abt; Cliff Han; Carmen Scheuner; Megan Lu; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Marcel Huntemann; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Evelyne-Marie Brambilla; Manfred Rohde; Stefan Spring; Sabine Gronow; Markus Göker; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; John C Detter
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2012-05-04

3.  Analysis of the key enzymes of butyric and acetic acid fermentation in biogas reactors.

Authors:  Christina Gabris; Frank R Bengelsdorf; Peter Dürre
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 5.813

4.  Complete genome sequence and description of Salinispira pacifica gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel spirochaete isolated form a hypersaline microbial mat.

Authors:  Wajdi Ben Hania; Manon Joseph; Peter Schumann; Boyke Bunk; Anne Fiebig; Cathrin Spröer; Hans-Peter Klenk; Marie-Laure Fardeau; Stefan Spring
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2015-02-09

5.  A phylogenomic and molecular signature based approach for characterization of the phylum Spirochaetes and its major clades: proposal for a taxonomic revision of the phylum.

Authors:  Radhey S Gupta; Sharmeen Mahmood; Mobolaji Adeolu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Genome sequence of the free-living aerobic spirochete Turneriella parva type strain (H(T)), and emendation of the species Turneriella parva.

Authors:  Erko Stackebrandt; Olga Chertkov; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Marcel Huntemann; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Chongle Pan; Manfred Rohde; Sabine Gronow; Markus Göker; John C Detter; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Tanja Woyke; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-05-25

7.  Complete genome sequence of the halophilic bacterium Spirochaeta africana type strain (Z-7692(T)) from the alkaline Lake Magadi in the East African Rift.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolos; Birte Abt; Carmen Scheuner; Hazuki Teshima; Brittany Held; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Marcel Huntemann; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Manfred Rohde; Brian J Tindall; John C Detter; Markus Göker; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Tanja Woyke; Hans-Peter Klenk; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-05-20

8.  Genome sequence of the phylogenetically isolated spirochete Leptonema illini type strain (3055(T)).

Authors:  Marcel Huntemann; Erko Stackebrandt; Brittany Held; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Manfred Rohde; Sabine Gronow; Markus Göker; John C Detter; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Tanja Woyke; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Alla Lapidus
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-05-25

9.  Gene network homology in prokaryotes using a similarity search approach: queries of quorum sensing signal transduction.

Authors:  David N Quan; William E Bentley
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Genome sequence of the thermophilic fresh-water bacterium Spirochaeta caldaria type strain (H1(T)), reclassification of Spirochaeta caldaria, Spirochaeta stenostrepta, and Spirochaeta zuelzerae in the genus Treponema as Treponema caldaria comb. nov., Treponema stenostrepta comb. nov., and Treponema zuelzerae comb. nov., and emendation of the genus Treponema.

Authors:  Birte Abt; Markus Göker; Carmen Scheuner; Cliff Han; Megan Lu; Monica Misra; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Marcel Huntemann; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Cynthia D Jeffries; Manfred Rohde; Stefan Spring; Sabine Gronow; John C Detter; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Tanja Woyke; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-04-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.