Literature DB >> 21304716

Complete genome sequence of Thermobispora bispora type strain (R51).

Konstantinos Liolios, Johannes Sikorski, Marlen Jando, Alla Lapidus, Alex Copeland, Tijana Glavina, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, Cliff Han, Tanja Woyke, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Olga Chertkov, Cheryl Kuske, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, John C Detter, Thomas Brettin, Manfred Rohde, Markus Göker, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Hans-Peter Klenk, Nikos C Kyrpides.   

Abstract

Thermobispora bispora (Henssen 1957) Wang et al. 1996 is the type species of the genus Thermobispora. This genus is of great interest because it is strictly thermophilic and because it has been shown for several of its members that the genome contains substantially distinct (6.4% sequence difference) and transcriptionally active 16S rRNA genes. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. This is the second completed genome sequence of a member from the suborder Streptosporangineae and the first genome sequence of a member of the genus Thermobispora. The 4,189,976 bp long genome with its 3,596 protein-coding and 63 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GEBA; Streptosporangineae; Two distinct 16S rRNA genes; non-pathogenic; strictly thermophilic

Year:  2010        PMID: 21304716      PMCID: PMC3035289          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.962171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain R51T (= DSM 43833 = ATCC 19993 = JCM 10125) is the type strain of the species Thermobispora bispora, which is the type species of the genus Thermobispora [1]. The generic name of the genus derives from the Greek words ‘thermos’, ‘bis’, and ‘spora’, to indicate high temperature two-spored organisms [1]. Strain R51T was isolated from decaying manure in Berlin (Germany) in 1954 [2]. Other strains were isolated during the same research project from other types of manure in other cities in Germany and in Finland [2]. As deduced from 16S gene sequences, T. bispora was also found in compost in Sweden [3]. Historically, strain R51T was originally classified in 1957 as Thermopolyspora bispora [2]. At the same time, a morphologically similar genus, Microbispora, was described [4], which has priority and T. bispora was subsequently transferred to the genus Microbispora [5,6]. However, based on thermal preferences [2,7], chemotaxonomic features [7], and the two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis patterns of the ribosomal protein AT-L30 [8], Microbispora bispora was subsequently removed from the genus Microbispora to be the type species of the new genus Thermobispora [1]. T. bispora is currently the only species in the genus Thermobispora [1]. In 1997 T. bispora gained interest, as it was described as the first organism to have two distinct (6.4% of total nucleotides) types of transcriptionally active 16S rRNA genes (GenBank accessions U83909 and U83912) [9]. Based on the two copies of the 16S rRNA genes that match best to sequence U83909 the closest related type strain (9% sequence difference [10]) is Micromonospora pattaloongensis [11] of the family Micromonosporaceae; based on the two copies of the 16S rRNA genes that match best to sequence U83912 the closest related type strain (8% sequence difference [10]) is Planotetraspora silvatica [12] of the family Streptosporangiaceae. Neither fit to the taxonomic position as shown in the List of Procaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature that shows the genus Thermobispora as a member of the family Pseudonocardiaceae, reflecting the current uncertainty of the taxonomic position of T. bispora [13]. In their recent review of Actinobacteria taxonomy, Zhi et al. [14] suggested to place Thermobispora in the suborder Streptosporangineae without assignment to a family, which is in accordance with our SSU rRNA tree (Figure 1). 16S rRNA sequences from environmental samples and metagenomic surveys with both 16S rRNA sequences detected phylotypes with approximately 89-92% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to both (U83909 and U83912) reference sequences only in a compost metagenome [21], indicating a very rare occurrence of Thermobispora-spp. in the environment (status March 2010). Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for T. bispora R51T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of T. bispora R51T relative to the type strains of the other genera within the suborder Streptosporangineae (except for Actinoallomurus, which was published after the analysis was completed). The tree was inferred from 1,371 aligned characters [15,16] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [17] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy [18]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [19] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold, e.g. the recently published GEBA genome from Streptosporangium roseum [20].

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of T. bispora R51T relative to the type strains of the other genera within the suborder Streptosporangineae (except for Actinoallomurus, which was published after the analysis was completed). The tree was inferred from 1,371 aligned characters [15,16] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [17] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy [18]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [19] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold, e.g. the recently published GEBA genome from Streptosporangium roseum [20].

Classification and features

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of for T. bispora R51T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the four 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome differ from each other by up to 94 nucleotides, and differ by up to 95 nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence generated from ATCC 19993 (U58523). T. bispora cells form substrate mycelia whose hyphae are 0.5 to 0.8 µm in diameter [1] (Figure 2). The aerial mycelia branch monopodally and bear longitudinal pairs of spores [1] (not visible in Figure 2). The spore diameters are usually 1.2 to 2.0 µm, but in liquid media spores with a diameter of 3 µm may occur [1]. The aerial mycelia are white, and the substrate mycelia are yellow or yellowish brown on the media used in the respective study (International Streptomyces Project medium 4 agar and IF0328 agar; Institute for Fermentation) [1]. No soluble pigment is produced [1]. T. bispora is an obligately thermophilic organism (Table 1) [1]. Starch is not hydrolyzed; inositol and rhamnose are utilized for growth, but arabinose and glycerol are not utilized [1]. Also, T. bispora is negative for iodinin production and nitrate reduction [1].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of T. bispora R51T

Table 1

Classification and general features of T. bispora R51T according to the MIGS recommendations [22]

MIGS ID       Property     Term    Evidence code
       Current classification     Domain Bacteria    TAS [23]
     Phylum ‘Actinobacteria    TAS [13]
     Class Actinobacteria    TAS [24]
     Subclass Actinobacteridae    TAS [14,24]
     Order Actinomycetales    TAS [14]
     Suborder Streptosporangineae    TAS [14]
     Family Incertae sedis    TAS [14]
     Genus Thermobispora    TAS [1]
     Species Thermobispora bispora    TAS [2]
     Type strain R51    TAS [5]
       Gram stain     positive    TAS [1]
       Cell shape     mycelia with hyphae    TAS [2]
       Motility     non-motile    TAS [1]
       Sporulation     sporulating    TAS [1]
       Temperature range     thermophile, 50°C - 65°C    TAS [1]
       Optimum temperature     not determined    TAS [1]
       Salinity     not determined    TAS [1]
MIGS-22       Oxygen requirement     aerobic    TAS [1,2]
       Carbon source     inositol and rhamnose    TAS [1]
       Energy source     sugars    TAS [1]
MIGS-6       Habitat     compost and other decaying material    TAS [2,3]
MIGS-15       Biotic relationship     unknown
MIGS-14       Pathogenicity     not reported
       Biosafety level     1    TAS [25]
       Isolation     decaying mixed manure    TAS [2]
MIGS-4       Geographic location     Berlin, Germany    TAS [2]
MIGS-5       Sample collection time     September 30, 1954    TAS [2]
MIGS-4.1MIGS-4.2       Latitude       Longitude     52.52     14.42    NAS
MIGS-4.3       Depth     not reported
MIGS-4.4       Altitude     not reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [26]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Scanning electron micrograph of T. bispora R51T Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [26]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Chemotaxonomy

The cell wall of strain R51T contains predominantly the menaquinone MK-9(H0) (75%) and only small amounts of MK-9(H2) and MK-9(H4) [7]. Strain R51T has a type PIV phospholipid pattern, and contains phosphatidylethanolamine but not phosphatidylglycerol and trace amounts of glucosamine-containing phospholipids [7]. The cell wall contains a major amount of meso-diaminopimelic acid, and the whole-cell hydrolysate contains madurose and galactose [1]. The fatty acid composition of strain R51T is dominated by saturated acids, with iso-C16:0 (55%) being the most frequent acid, followed by anteiso-C17:0 (8%), the unsaturated C18:1 (8%), iso-C18:0 (6%) and C16:0 [7]. Also, strain R51T contains minor amounts of 10-methyl-branched chain fatty acids [7].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [27], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [28]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [19] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID     Property     Term
MIGS-31     Finishing quality     Finished
MIGS-28     Libraries used     Three genomic libraries:     two Sanger libraries – 8 kb pMCL200 and fosmid pcc1FOS     and one 454 pyrosequece standard library
MIGS-29     Sequencing platforms     ABI3730, 454 GS FLX
MIGS-31.2     Sequencing coverage     7.1× Sanger; 1.1× pyrosequence pseudo-reads
MIGS-30     Assemblers     Newbler version 1.1.02.15, phrap
MIGS-32     Gene calling method     Prodigal, GenePRIMP
     INSDC ID     CP001874
     Genbank Date of Release     May 17, 2010
     GOLD ID     Gc01281
     NCBI project ID     469371
     Database: IMG-GEBA     2501651196
MIGS-13     Source material identifier     DSM 43833
     Project relevance     Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

T. bispora strain R51T, DSM 43833, was grown in DSMZ medium 84 (Rolled oats mineral medium) [29] at 55°C. DNA was isolated from 1-1.5 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with lysis modification st/FT according to Wu et al. [28].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of T. bispora was sequenced using a combination of Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at http://www.jgi.doe.gov/. 454 pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 1.1.02.15 (Roche). Large Newbler contigs were broken into 4,798 overlapping fragments of 1,000 bp and entered into assembly as pseudo-reads. The sequences were assigned quality scores based on Newbler consensus q-scores with modifications to account for overlap redundancy and to adjust inflated q-scores. A hybrid 454/Sanger assembly was made using the parallel phrap assembler (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher or transposon bombing of bridging clones [30]. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, custom primer walk or PCR amplification. A total of 1,181 Sanger finishing reads were produced to close gaps, to resolve repetitive regions, and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. The final assembly consists of 40,290 Sanger and 1.1× pyrosequence based pseudo-reads. Together Sanger reads and pseudo-reads provided 8.19× coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [31] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome an-notation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [32]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [33].

Genome properties

The genome is 4,189,976 bp long and comprises one main circular chromosome with an overall GC content of 72.4% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 3,659 genes predicted, 3,596 were protein-coding genes, and 63 RNAs; fifty pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (71.9%) were assigned with a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

AttributeValue  % of Total
Genome size (bp)4,189,976  100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)3,548,135  84.68%
DNA G+C content (bp)3,034,765  72.43%
Number of replicons1
Extrachromosomal elements0
Total genes3,659  100.00%
RNA genes63  1.72%
rRNA operons3
Protein-coding genes3,596  98.28%
Pseudo genes50  1.37%
Genes with function prediction2,632  71.93%
Genes in paralog clusters491  13.42%
Genes assigned to COGs2,610  71.33%
Genes assigned Pfam domains2,844  77.73%
Genes with signal peptides795  21.73%
Genes with transmembrane helices864  23.61%
CRISPR repeats6
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code   value     %age    Description
J   149     5.0    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A   1     0.0    RNA processing and modification
K   304     10.3    Transcription
L   141     4.8    Replication, recombination and repair
B   1     0.0    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D   21     1.0    Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y   0     0.0    Nuclear structure
V   48     1.6    Defense mechanisms
T   192     6.5    Signal transduction mechanisms
M   140     4.7    Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N   3     0.1    Cell motility
Z   0     0.0    Cytoskeleton
W   0     0.0    Extracellular structures
U   29     1.0    Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O   98     3.3    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C   204     6.9    Energy production and conversion
G   221     7.5    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   279     9.4    Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   82     2.8    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   146     4.9    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   133     4.5    Lipid transport and metabolism
P   138     4.7    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   85     2.9    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R   351     11.9    General function prediction only
S   191     6.5    Function unknown
-   1,049     28.7    Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  27 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  [On the knowledge of thermophilic actinomycetes].

Authors:  A Henssen; E Schnepf
Journal:  Arch Mikrobiol       Date:  1967-06-21

4.  The actinomycete Thermobispora bispora contains two distinct types of transcriptionally active 16S rRNA genes.

Authors:  Y Wang; Z Zhang; N Ramanan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Micromonospora pattaloongensis sp. nov., isolated from a Thai mangrove forest.

Authors:  Chitti Thawai; Somboon Tanasupawat; Takuji Kudo
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  A taxonomic review of the genus Microbispora by analysis of ribosomal protein AT-L30.

Authors:  K Ochi; K Haraguchi; S Miyadoh
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1993-01

7.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea.

Authors:  Dongying Wu; Philip Hugenholtz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Rüdiger Pukall; Eileen Dalin; Natalia N Ivanova; Victor Kunin; Lynne Goodwin; Martin Wu; Brian J Tindall; Sean D Hooper; Amrita Pati; Athanasios Lykidis; Stefan Spring; Iain J Anderson; Patrik D'haeseleer; Adam Zemla; Mitchell Singer; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Alex Copeland; Cliff Han; Feng Chen; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Cheryl Kerfeld; Elke Lang; Sabine Gronow; Patrick Chain; David Bruce; Edward M Rubin; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Complete genome sequence of Streptosporangium roseum type strain (NI 9100).

Authors:  Matt Nolan; Johannes Sikorski; Marlen Jando; Susan Lucas; Alla Lapidus; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Feng Chen; Hope Tice; Sam Pitluck; Jan-Fang Cheng; Olga Chertkov; David Sims; Linda Meincke; Thomas Brettin; Cliff Han; John C Detter; David Bruce; Lynne Goodwin; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Patrick Chain; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; Jim Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-01-28
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Phylogenetic framework and molecular signatures for the main clades of the phylum Actinobacteria.

Authors:  Beile Gao; Radhey S Gupta
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 2.  Gifted microbes for genome mining and natural product discovery.

Authors:  Richard H Baltz
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Characterization of a uronate dehydrogenase from Thermobispora bispora for production of glucaric acid from hemicellulose substrate.

Authors:  Yaxian Li; Yemin Xue; Zhigang Cao; Tao Zhou; Fawze Alnadari
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Genome sequence of the ocean sediment bacterium Saccharomonospora marina type strain (XMU15(T)).

Authors:  Hans-Peter Klenk; Megan Lu; Susan Lucas; Alla Lapidus; Alex Copeland; Sam Pitluck; Lynne A Goodwin; Cliff Han; Roxanne Tapia; Evelyne-Marie Brambilla; Gabriele Pötter; Miriam Land; Natalia Ivanova; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; John C Detter; Wen-Jun Li; Nikos C Kyrpides; Tanja Woyke
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2012-05-15

5.  A novel highly thermostable xylanase stimulated by Ca2+ from Thermotoga thermarum: cloning, expression and characterization.

Authors:  Hao Shi; Yu Zhang; Xun Li; Yingjuan Huang; Liangliang Wang; Ye Wang; Huaihai Ding; Fei Wang
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  Complete genome sequence of Thermomonospora curvata type strain (B9).

Authors:  Olga Chertkov; Johannes Sikorski; Matt Nolan; Alla Lapidus; Susan Lucas; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Olivier D Ngatchou Djao; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Thomas Brettin; Cliff Han; John C Detter; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Hans-Peter Klenk; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2011-02-20

7.  Genome sequence of the soil bacterium Saccharomonospora azurea type strain (NA-128(T)).

Authors:  Hans-Peter Klenk; Brittany Held; Susan Lucas; Alla Lapidus; Alex Copeland; Nancy Hammon; Sam Pitluck; Lynne A Goodwin; Cliff Han; Roxanne Tapia; Evelyne-Marie Brambilla; Gabriele Pötter; Miriam Land; Natalia Ivanova; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; John C Detter; Nikos C Kyrpides; Tanja Woyke
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2012-05-05

8.  Genomics of aerobic cellulose utilization systems in actinobacteria.

Authors:  Iain Anderson; Birte Abt; Athanasios Lykidis; Hans-Peter Klenk; Nikos Kyrpides; Natalia Ivanova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Thermophilic and alkaliphilic Actinobacteria: biology and potential applications.

Authors:  L Shivlata; Tulasi Satyanarayana
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Complete genome sequence of Saccharothrix espanaensis DSM 44229(T) and comparison to the other completely sequenced Pseudonocardiaceae.

Authors:  Tina Strobel; Arwa Al-Dilaimi; Jochen Blom; Arne Gessner; Jörn Kalinowski; Marta Luzhetska; Alfred Pühler; Rafael Szczepanowski; Andreas Bechthold; Christian Rückert
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.