Literature DB >> 21304675

Complete genome sequence of Streptosporangium roseum type strain (NI 9100).

Matt Nolan, Johannes Sikorski, Marlen Jando, Susan Lucas, Alla Lapidus, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Feng Chen, Hope Tice, Sam Pitluck, Jan-Fang Cheng, Olga Chertkov, David Sims, Linda Meincke, Thomas Brettin, Cliff Han, John C Detter, David Bruce, Lynne Goodwin, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Patrick Chain, Manfred Rohde, Markus Göker, Jim Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk.   

Abstract

Streptosporangium roseum Crauch 1955 is the type strain of the species which is the type species of the genus Streptosporangium. The 'pinkish coiled Streptomyces-like organism with a spore case' was isolated from vegetable garden soil in 1955. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. This is the first completed genome sequence of a member of the family Streptosporangiaceae, and the second largest microbial genome sequence ever deciphered. The 10,369,518 bp long genome with its 9421 protein-coding and 80 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gram-positive; S. cloviforme; Sporangia; Streptosporangiaceae; aerobic; non-motile; non-motile spores; vegetative and aerial mycelia

Year:  2010        PMID: 21304675      PMCID: PMC3035251          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.631049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain NI 9100T (= DSM 43021 = ATCC 12428 = JCM 3005) is the type strain of the species Streptosporangium roseum, which is the type species of the genus Streptosporangium, the type genus of the actinobacterial suborder Streptosporanineae [1-4]. S. roseum NI 9100T was isolated from vegetable garden soil and first described by Crouch in 1955 [2,4]. The name derives from ‘strepto’ from Greek meaning ‘coiled’ combined with ‘sporangium’, Latin for ‘spore case’, to mean ‘streptomyces-like’ but with sporangia [2,4]. The species epithet ‘roseum’ derives from the pinkish color on potato dextrose agar [2]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for S. roseum NI 9100T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

The 16S rRNA genes of the thirteen other validly named species currently ascribed to the genus Streptosporangium share 96-100% (S. vulgare [5]) sequence identity with NI 9100T, but S. claviforme (94%) [6,7] apparently does not belong to this genus (but to the genus Herbidospora) and thus has been excluded from phylogenetic analysis (see below). Two reference strains, DSM 43871 (X89949), and DSM 44111 (X89947), differ by just one nucleotide from strain NI 9100T, whereas the effectively published named species ‘S. koreanum’ DSM 44110 [99.9%, 5], ‘S. brasiliense’ DSM 44109 [99.4%, 5] and ‘S. rubrum’ DSM 44095 [99.4%, 5] appear to members of the genus. Members of the species and genus are rare in nature, at least based on the habitats screened thus far as 16S rRNA in environmental samples and metagenomic surveys do not exceed 88-91% sequence similarity to the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain NI 9100T (U48996, X70425, X89947; status August 2009). Figure 1a and Figure 1b show the phylogenetic neighborhood of S. roseum NI 9100T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequence of the six 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome do not differ from each other, and are identical to the previously published sequence generated from DSM 43021 (X89947), whereas the sequence generated in the same year from the JCM 3005 version of strain 9100T (U48996) differs by 24 nucleotides (1.7%).
Figure 1a

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of S. roseum NI 9100T relative to the type strains of the other species within the genus (1a) except for S. claviforme (see text). The tree was inferred from 1,411 and aligned characters [8,9] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [10] and either rooted with the results of Figure 1b (Figure 1a) or rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [11] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold.

Figure 1b

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of S. roseum NI 9100T relative to the type strains of the other genera within the family Streptosporanginea . The tree was inferred from 1,369 aligned characters [8,9] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [10] and either rooted with the results of Figure 1b (Figure 1a) or rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [11] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of S. roseum NI 9100T relative to the type strains of the other species within the genus (1a) except for S. claviforme (see text). The tree was inferred from 1,411 and aligned characters [8,9] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [10] and either rooted with the results of Figure 1b (Figure 1a) or rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [11] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold. Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of S. roseum NI 9100T relative to the type strains of the other genera within the family Streptosporanginea . The tree was inferred from 1,369 aligned characters [8,9] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [10] and either rooted with the results of Figure 1b (Figure 1a) or rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [11] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold. A summary of the classification and features for S. roseum is listed in Table 1. We draw attention to the reader that we find quite an amount of contradictive results between old and more recent literature (see below). A potential but not ultimate source for this observation could be the usage of different experimental methods. A variety of media were used in the original description pertaining to cellular and mycelium morphology on (Figure 2) The color of the substrate mycelium is red-brown to yellow-brown [2,24]. Strain NI 9100T utilizes glucose, arabinose, sucrose, xylose, fructose, and raffinose, but not inositol, mannose, rhamnose, or cellulose [19,20]. The strain is positive for arginine dihydrolase and acetoin production (Voges Proskauer test), weakly positive for citrate utilization, lysine decarboxylase, and ornithine decarboxylase, and negative for Kohn's gelatin gelatinase, urease, o-nitro-phenyl-galactoside β-galactosidase, tryptophan desaminase, tryptophan indole production, H2S production from sodium thiosulfate [19,20]. Starch hydrolysis and nitrate reduction are positive, but growth at 42°C and iodinin production are negative [24]. Mertz and Yao [18] reported that strain NI 9100T can utilize glycerol, arabinose, rhamnose and inositol, which is in part contradictory to other results [20,21]. Gelatin is liquefied, milk is peptonized and red-brown to purple-brown soluble pigments are produced [18]. Zhang et al. [21] describe strain NI 9100T as utilizing sorbitol and sorbose but to be negative for L-arabinose, erythrose, D-fructose, D-galactose, inositol, D-mannose, maltose, raffinose, and rhamnose, which again is in part in conflict with other studies [18-20]. Strain NI 9100T produces a secondary metabolite, the antibiotic angucycline WS 79089B, which is an inhibitor of the endothelin-converting enzyme [20]. In contrast to S. carneum, strain NI 9100T does not produce an antibiotic against Staphylococcus aureus [18].
Table 1

Classification and general features of S. roseum NI 9100T according to the MIGS recommendations [12]

MIGS IDProperty     TermEvidence code
Current classification     Domain BacteriaTAS [13]
     Phylum ActinobacteriaTAS [14]
     Class ActinobacteriaTAS [15]
     Subclass ActinobacteridaeTAS [15]
     Order ActinomycetalesTAS [15]
     Suborder StreptosporangineaeTAS [15]
     Family StreptosporangiaceaeTAS [16,17]
     Genus StreptosporangiumTAS [1-4]
     Species Streptosporangium roseumTAS [1-4]
     Type strain NI 9100
Gram stain     not tested, probably positiveNAS [15,16]
Cell shape     produces aerial myceliumTAS [2]
Motility     non-motileTAS [2]
Sporulation     non-motile sporesTAS [2]
Temperature range     mesophile, temperature range not determined, does not grow at 42°CTAS [1,18]
Optimum temperature     28°CTAS [1,18]
Salinity     2.5% NaClTAS [19,20]
MIGS-22Oxygen requirement     aerobicTAS [2]
Carbon source     several (see text), but be aware of contradicting resultsTAS [19-21]
Energy source     carbohydratesTAS [19-21]
MIGS-6Habitat     soilTAS [2]
MIGS-15Biotic relationship     free livingTAS [2]
MIGS-14Pathogenicity     non pathogenicNAS
Biosafety level     1TAS [22]
Isolation     vegetable garden soilTAS [2]
MIGS-4Geographic location     most probably Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USATAS [2]
MIGS-5Sample collection time     1955 or beforeTAS [2]
MIGS-4.1 MIGS-4.2Latitude, Longitude     35.913, -79.055
MIGS-4.3Depth     not reported
MIGS-4.4Altitude     not reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [23]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert or mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of S. roseum NI 9100T

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [23]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert or mentioned in the acknowledgements. Scanning electron micrograph of S. roseum NI 9100T The characteristics of the ribosomal protein AT-L30 of strain S. roseum JCM2178T in comparison to other bacteria of the genus Streptosporangium is described elsewhere [25]. These data should be taken cautiously, as according to the Japanese Collection of Microorganisms (JCM) catalogue the strain number “JCM2178” is affiliated with Aspergillus oryzae (accessed to JCM in August 09), hence the true nature of strain S. roseum JCM2178T in the study of Ochi [25] is unclear.

Chemotaxonomy

The major fatty acids (relative ratio %) are iso-C16:0 (40.0), C17:0 10-methyl (23.0), C16:0 (1.95), C16:0 10-methyl (6.0), iso-C14:0 (14.0) (Reiner Kroppenstedt, personal communication). Partly different fatty acid patterns are reported elsewhere [18-20,26,27]. The proportions of diaminopimelic acid (A2pm) in the cell wall of strain S. roseum NI 9100T are 71% meso-A2pm and 29% LL-A2pm [26]. The phospholipids of strain S. roseum NI 9100T are phosphatidylethanolamine, hydroxyphosphatidylethanolamine, ninhydrin-positive and sugar-positive phospholipids, disphosphatidylglycerol, and posphatidylinositol [1]. The menaquinone compositions are MK-9 (III, VIII-H4) (56.5%), MK-9 (H2) (37.8%), MK-9 (H0) (5.0%), and MK-9 (H6) (0.7%) [1]. Galactose and madurose are present in whole cell sugars extracts, rhamnose is absent [1]. In general, the genus Streptosporangium is characterized by the whole-cell sugar type B or C, the phospholipid type IV and of the fatty acid type 3c [1].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position, and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [11] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID     Property     Term
MIGS-31     Finishing quality     Finished
MIGS-28     Libraries used     Two Sanger libraries: 6kb pMCL200 and fosmid pcc1Fos     One 454 Pyrosequence standard library
MIGS-29     Sequencing platforms     ABI3730, 454 GS FLX
MIGS-31.2     Sequencing coverage     8.45× Sanger; 27.6× Pyrosequence
MIGS-30     Assemblers     Newbler, phrap
MIGS-32     Gene calling method     Prodigal, GenePrimp
     INSDC ID     CP001814 (genome), CP001815 (plasmid)
     Genbank Date of Release     12/10/2009
     GOLD ID     Gc01156
     NCBI project ID     21083
     Database: IMG-GEBA     2501799901
MIGS-13     Source material identifier     DSM 43021
     Project relevance     Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

S. roseum NI 9100T, DSM 43021, was grown in DSMZ medium 535, Trypticase Soy Broth [28], at 28°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using the JGI CTAP procedure with modification ALM as described in [29].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at http://www.jgi.doe.gov/. 454 Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 1.1.02.15 (Roche). Large Newbler contigs were broken into 11,709 overlapping fragments of 1,000 bp and entered into assembly as pseudo-reads. The sequences were assigned quality scores based on Newbler consensus q-scores with modifications to account for overlap redundancy and to adjust inflated q-scores. A hybrid 454/Sanger assembly was made using the parallel phrap assembler (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher [30] or transposon bombing of bridging clones (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, custom primer walk or PCR amplification. A total of 2,837 Sanger finishing reads were produced to close gaps, to resolve repetitive regions, and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together all sequence types provided 36.05× coverage of the genome. The final assembly contains 128,042 Sanger and 1,033,578 Pyrosequence reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [31] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline (http://geneprimp.jgi-psf.org) [32]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [33].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 10,341,314 bp long chromosome and a small 28,204 bp plasmid with a 70.9% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 9,501 genes predicted, 9,421 were protein coding genes, and 80 RNAs. In addition, 446 pseudogenes were identified. The majority of protein-coding genes (62.5%) were assigned a putative function while those remaining were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

AttributeValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)10,369,518100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)9,121,91087.97%
DNA G+C content (bp)7,348,16270.86%
Number of replicons2
Extrachromosomal elements1
Total genes9,501100.00%
RNA genes800.84%
rRNA operons6
Protein-coding genes9,42199.16%
Pseudo genes4464.49%
Genes with function prediction5,93962.47%
Genes in paralog clusters2,79229.37%
Genes assigned to COGs6,22465.47%
Genes assigned Pfam domains6,59669.38%
Genes with signal peptides2,24823.65%
Genes with transmembrane helices2,23523.51%
CRISPR repeats0
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome; plasmid not to scale. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Codevalue%age   Description
J2262.4   Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A10.0   RNA processing and modification
K96610.3   Transcription
L2933.1   Replication, recombination and repair
B10.0   Chromatin structure and dynamics
D380.4   Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y00.0   Nuclear structure
V1892.0   Defense mechanisms
T5115.4   Signal transduction mechanisms
M2983.2   Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N20.0   Cell motility
Z10.0   Cytoskeleton
W00.0   Extracellular structures
U430.5   Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O1671.8   Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C4244.5   Energy production and conversion
G6396.8   Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E6006.4   Amino acid transport and metabolism
F1241.3   Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H2542.7   Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I3063.2   Lipid transport and metabolism
P3203.4   Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q3153.3   Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R97410.3   General function prediction only
S4735.0   Function unknown
-318733.8   Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the genome; plasmid not to scale. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  15 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. List No. 40.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1992-01

4.  Proposal to transfer Actinomadura carminata to a new subspecies of the genus Nonomuraea as Nonomuraea roseoviolacea subsp. carminata comb. nov.

Authors:  Y Gyobu; S Miyadoh
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis of ribosomal protein AT-L30 from an actinomycete genus, Streptosporangium.

Authors:  K Ochi; S Miyadoh
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1992-01

6.  Streptosporangium canum sp. nov., isolated from soil.

Authors:  Li-Ping Zhang; Li-Min Zhang; Xiu-Min Zhang
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea.

Authors:  Dongying Wu; Philip Hugenholtz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Rüdiger Pukall; Eileen Dalin; Natalia N Ivanova; Victor Kunin; Lynne Goodwin; Martin Wu; Brian J Tindall; Sean D Hooper; Amrita Pati; Athanasios Lykidis; Stefan Spring; Iain J Anderson; Patrik D'haeseleer; Adam Zemla; Mitchell Singer; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Alex Copeland; Cliff Han; Feng Chen; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Cheryl Kerfeld; Elke Lang; Sabine Gronow; Patrick Chain; David Bruce; Edward M Rubin; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Complete genome sequence of Kytococcus sedentarius type strain (541).

Authors:  David Sims; Thomas Brettin; John C Detter; Cliff Han; Alla Lapidus; Alex Copeland; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Matt Nolan; Feng Chen; Susan Lucas; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; David Bruce; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Galina Ovchinnikova; Amrita Pati; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavrommatis; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Patrik D'haeseleer; Patrick Chain; Jim Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Susanne Schneider; Markus Göker; Rüdiger Pukall; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2009-07-20

10.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Phylogenetic framework and molecular signatures for the main clades of the phylum Actinobacteria.

Authors:  Beile Gao; Radhey S Gupta
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  MbtH homology codes to identify gifted microbes for genome mining.

Authors:  Richard H Baltz
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 3.  Gifted microbes for genome mining and natural product discovery.

Authors:  Richard H Baltz
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Genetic insights into pyralomicin biosynthesis in Nonomuraea spiralis IMC A-0156.

Authors:  Patricia M Flatt; Xiumei Wu; Steven Perry; Taifo Mahmud
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 4.050

Review 5.  Microbial genome mining for accelerated natural products discovery: is a renaissance in the making?

Authors:  Brian O Bachmann; Steven G Van Lanen; Richard H Baltz
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Characterization of a novel subgroup of extracellular medium-chain-length polyhydroxyalkanoate depolymerases from actinobacteria.

Authors:  Joana Gangoiti; Marta Santos; María Auxiliadora Prieto; Isabel de la Mata; Juan L Serra; María J Llama
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Complete genome sequence of Thermomonospora curvata type strain (B9).

Authors:  Olga Chertkov; Johannes Sikorski; Matt Nolan; Alla Lapidus; Susan Lucas; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Olivier D Ngatchou Djao; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Thomas Brettin; Cliff Han; John C Detter; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Hans-Peter Klenk; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2011-02-20

8.  NBC: the Naive Bayes Classification tool webserver for taxonomic classification of metagenomic reads.

Authors:  Gail L Rosen; Erin R Reichenberger; Aaron M Rosenfeld
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Complete genome sequence of Thermobispora bispora type strain (R51).

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; Johannes Sikorski; Marlen Jando; Alla Lapidus; Alex Copeland; Tijana Glavina; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Cliff Han; Tanja Woyke; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Olga Chertkov; Cheryl Kuske; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; John C Detter; Thomas Brettin; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Hans-Peter Klenk; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-06-15

10.  Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and contextual data of the filamentous soil bacterium Ktedonobacter racemifer type strain (SOSP1-21).

Authors:  Yun-Juan Chang; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Olga Chertkov; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Matt Nolan; Alex Copeland; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Cliff Han; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Natalia Ivanova; Galina Ovchinikova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Konstantinos Liolios; Thomas Brettin; Anne Fiebig; Manfred Rohde; Birte Abt; Markus Göker; John C Detter; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Alla Lapidus
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2011-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.