Literature DB >> 21304631

Complete genome sequence of Brachybacterium faecium type strain (Schefferle 6-10).

Alla Lapidus, Rüdiger Pukall, Kurt Labuttii, Alex Copeland, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Matt Nolan, Feng Chen, Susan Lucas, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, David Bruce, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Manfred Rohde, Markus Göker, Amrita Pati, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavrommatis, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Patrik D'haeseleer, Patrick Chain, Jim Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk.   

Abstract

Brachybacterium faecium Collins et al. 1988 is the type species of the genus, and is of phylogenetic interest because of its location in the Dermabacteraceae, a rather isolated family within the actinobacterial suborder Micrococcineae. B. faecium is known for its rod-coccus growth cycle and the ability to degrade uric acid. It grows aerobically or weakly anaerobically. The strain described in this report is a free-living, nonmotile, Gram-positive bacterium, originally isolated from poultry deep litter. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence, and annotation. This is the first complete genome sequence of a member of the actinobacterial family Dermabacteraceae, and the 3,614,992 bp long single replicon genome with its 3129 protein-coding and 69 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dermabacteraceae; aerobic; free-living; mesophile; non-pathogenic; rod-coccus growth cycle; uric acid degradation

Year:  2009        PMID: 21304631      PMCID: PMC3035206          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain Schefferle 6-10T (DSM 4810 = ATCC 43885 = JCM 11609 = NCIMB 9860) is the type strain of Brachybacterium faecium, which is the type species of the genus Brachybacterium [1] (Figure 1). B. faecium was described by Collins et al. in 1988 [1] as Gram-positive and nonmotile. The organism is of significant interest for its position in the tree of life where the rapidly growing genus Brachybacterium (12 species) is located in the actinobacterial family Dermabacteraceae [6].
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree of B. faecium Schefferle 6-10T and all type strains of the genus Brachybacterium, inferred from 1408 aligned characters [2] of the 16S rRNA sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [3,4]. The tree was rooted with Dermabacter hominis, another member of the family Dermabacteraceae. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1000 bootstrap replicates, if larger than 60%. Strains with a genome-sequencing project registered in GOLD [5] are printed in blue; published genomes in bold.

Phylogenetic tree of B. faecium Schefferle 6-10T and all type strains of the genus Brachybacterium, inferred from 1408 aligned characters [2] of the 16S rRNA sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [3,4]. The tree was rooted with Dermabacter hominis, another member of the family Dermabacteraceae. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1000 bootstrap replicates, if larger than 60%. Strains with a genome-sequencing project registered in GOLD [5] are printed in blue; published genomes in bold. Only two accompanying strains (Schefferle 3-8 = NCIMB 9859, and Schefferle 7-11 = NCIMB 9861) were initially reported from the poultry deep litter from which the type strain Schefferle 6-10T was isolated [7]. Both strains were later reclassified as members of other Brachybacterium species: B. conglomeratum (NCIMB 9859) and B. paraconglomeratum (NCIMB 9861). Some closely related isolates with more than 98.5% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity were reported from marine sediments (JH107; FJ572028), deep-sea sediments (PB10; DQ643203), and living room air (Gauze_W_12_19; FJ267545). Only four sequences from uncultured bacteria are accessible via EMBL, showing at least 98% sequence identity to B. faecium. These sequences were derived from the analyses of urban aerosols (DQ129569), human vaginal epithelium (AY959187), floor dust (FM872846), and water 20m downstream of manure (AY212613). No phylotypes from environmental screening or genomic surveys could be linked to B. faecium (as of February 2009). Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for B. faecium Schefferle 6-10T (Table 1), together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.
Table 1

Classification and general features of B. faecium Schefferle 6-10T based on MIGS recommendations [8]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence code
Current classificationDomain BacteriaPhylum ActinobacteriaClass ActinobacteriaOrder ActinomycetalesFamily DermabacteraceaeGenus BrachybacteriumSpecies Brachybacterium faeciumType strain Schefferle 6-10TAS [6]TAS [6]TAS [6]TAS [1]TAS [1]
Gram stainpositiveTAS [1]
Cell shapevaries; rod-coccus growth cycleTAS [1]
MotilitynonmotileTAS [1]
Sporulationnon-sporulatingTAS [1]
Temperature rangemesophilicTAS [1]
Optimum temperature25-30°CTAS [1]
Salinity5g NaCl/LTAS [1]
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementaerobic; very weak growth underanaerobic conditionsTAS [1]
Carbon sourceglucose, maltose, mannose, cellobioseTAS [1]
Energy sourcestarchNAS
MIGS-6Habitatdeep litter (soil)TAS [7]
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipfree-livingNAS
MIGS-14PathogenicitynoneNAS
Biosafety level1TAS [9]
Isolationpoultry deep litterTAS [7]
MIGS-4Geographic locationTAS [7]
MIGS-5Sample collection timeabout 1966TAS [7]
MIGS-4.1 MIGS-4.2Latitude – Longitudenot reported
MIGS-4.3Depthnot reported
MIGS-4.4Altitudenot reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [10]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property should have been directly observed, for the purpose of this specific publication, for a live isolate by one of the authors, or an expert or reputable institution mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [10]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property should have been directly observed, for the purpose of this specific publication, for a live isolate by one of the authors, or an expert or reputable institution mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Classification and features

B. faecium Schefferle 6-10T cells vary in shape and exhibit a rod-coccus growth cycle, which is not atypical of this evolutionary group. Cells in the stationary phase are predominantly coccoid (Figure 2), whereas cells in fresh cultures are irregular, slender rods [1]. Cells are frequently arranged at an angle to give V-formations [1] (Figure 2). B. faecium cells are non-acid fast and do not form endospores [1]. B. faecium is essentially aerobic, but is also capable of very weak growth under anaerobic conditions [1].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of B. faecium Schefferle 6-10T

Scanning electron micrograph of B. faecium Schefferle 6-10T B. faecium is capable of degrading uric acid, and fermenting cellobiose, glucose, maltose, and mannose, but not cellulose, chitin, or gelatin. The optimal growth temperature is 25-30°C. Nitrate is reduced to nitrite by some B. faecium strains [1] as a candidate for terminal electron acceptor during anaerobic growth. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of B. faecium strain Schefferle 6-10T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the three 16S rRNA genes in the B. faecium Schefferle 6-10T genome differ by up to two nucleotides (nts) from each other, and by three nts from the reference sequence of strain DSM 4810 (X91032). The slight differences between the genome data and the previously reported 16S rRNA gene sequence is most likely due to sequencing errors in the previously reported sequence data.

Chemotaxonomy

Strain Schefferle 6-10T was originally described as a coryneform bacterium. This descriptive term applies to a diverse range of taxa and indicates that the comparisons made in the original publication need to be reviewed. The murein of B. faecium contains meso-diaminopimelic acid, alanine and glutamic acid. The strain possesses a type A4γ peptidoglycan, type A31.2 according to the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures. Galactose and glucose are the cell wall sugars [1]. As in other Brachybacterium strains, the fatty acid pattern of strain Schefferle 6-10T is dominated by branched-chain saturated anteiso- (ai-) fatty acids: ai-C15:0 (40%), ai-C17:0 (37%), and C16:0 and iso-C16:0 7.5%, each, with smaller amounts of iso-C15:0 (3.5%), iso-C17:0 (2.0%) [1]. Straight chain and unsaturated fatty acids are absent [1]. As usual for most members of the Actinomycetales, mycolic acids were not reported [1]. A menaqui-

none with seven isoprene units (MK-7) predominates (88%) complemented by 11% MK-8 [1]. Phosphatidylglycerol and diphosphatidylglycerol were identified as the dominant polar lipids, together with several glycolipids and an unknown phospholipid [1]. The Rf values of the glycolipids suggest that they contain different numbers of sugars (one, two or possibly three) and may also show differences in the nature and linkage of the sugars. It is not known whether these glycolipids are based on a diglyceride or whether they contain an acylated sugar, directly linked to a monoglyceride. The chemical composition is typical of members of the genus Brachybacterium and similar, but not identical with the members of the only other genus placed in the family Dermabacteraceae, Dermabacter. In addition to cytochrome aa3, B. faecium possesses cytochrome d626, and cytochrome c550 [11].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position, and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [5] and the complete genome sequence in GenBank (CP001643). Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS-31Finishing qualityFinished
MIGS-28Libraries usedTwo genomic libraries: 8kb pMCL200 and fosmid pcc1Fos Sanger libraries One 454 pyrosequence standard library and one Illumina library
MIGS-29Sequencing platformsABI3730, 454 GS FLX, Illumina GA
MIGS-31.2Sequencing coverage10x Sanger; 40x pyrosequence
MIGS-30AssemblersNewbler version 1.1.02.15, PGA
MIGS-32Gene calling methodGenemark 4.6b, tRNAScan-SE-1.23, infernal 0.81
Genbank IDCP001643
Genbank Date of ReleaseN/A
GOLD IDGi02066
NCBI project ID17026
Database: IMG-GEBA2500868055
MIGS-13Source Material IdentifierDSM 4810
Project relevanceTree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

B. faecium Schefferle 6-10T, DSM 4810, was grown in DSMZ medium 92 (with 3% trypticase soy broth, 0.3% yeast extract) at 28°C. DNA was isolated from 1-1.5 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) without modification of the manufacturer’s protocol for cell lysis.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Sanger, 454 and Illumina sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found on the JGI website. 454 Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 1.1.02.15 (Roche). Large Newbler contigs were broken into 4,074 overlapping fragments of 1,000 bp and entered into the assembly as pseudo-reads. The sequences were assigned quality scores based on Newbler consensus q-scores with modifications to account for overlap redundancy and to adjust inflated q-scores. A hybrid 454/Sanger assembly was made using the PGA assembler. Possible mis-assemblies were corrected and gaps between contigs were closed by custom primer walks from sub-clones or PCR products. 258 Sanger finishing reads were produced. Illumina reads were used to improve the final consensus quality using an in-house developed tool (the Polisher). The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together all sequence types provided 50x coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using GeneMark [12] as part of the genome annotation pipeline in the Integrated Microbial Genomes Expert Review (IMG-ER) system [13], followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. The tRNAScanSE tool [15] was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNAs were found by using the tool RNAmmer [16]. Other non-coding RNAs were identified by searching the genome for the Rfam profiles using INFERNAL (v0.81) [17]. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) platform [18].

Metabolic network analysis

The metabolic Pathway/Genome Database (PGDB) was computationally generated using Pathway Tools software version 12.5 [19] and MetaCyc version 12.5 [20], based on annotated EC numbers and a customized enzyme name mapping file. It has undergone no subsequent manual curation and may contain errors, similar to a Tier 3 BioCyc PGDB [21].

Genome properties

The genome is 3,614,992 bp long and comprises one circular chromosome with a 72.1% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 3,198 genes predicted, 3,129 were protein coding genes, and 69 RNAs. Sixty pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of genes (77.3%) of the genes were assigned with a putative function while the remaining ones are annotated as hypothetical proteins. The properties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Table 3. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4, and a cellular overview diagram is presented in Figure 4, followed by a summary of metabolic network statistics shown in Table 5.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

AttributeValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)3,614,992
DNA Coding region (bp)3,287,73590.95%
DNA G+C content (bp)2,604,44972.05%
Number of replicons1
Extrachromosomal elements0
Total genes3198
RNA genes692.16%
rRNA operons3
Protein-coding genes312997.84%
Pseudo genes601.88%
Genes with function prediction247377.33%
Genes in paralog clusters34710.85%
Genes assigned to COGs237174.14%
Genes assigned Pfam domains244076.30%
Genes with signal peptides69721.79%
Genes with transmembrane helices83626.14%
CRISPR repeats0
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the 21 general COG functional categories

CodeValue%Description
J1635.2Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A10.0RNA processing and modification
K2046.5Transcription
L1254.0Replication, recombination and repair
B10.0Chromatin structure and dynamics
D190.6Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y00.0Nuclear structure
V531.7Defense mechanisms
T882.8Signal transduction mechanisms
M1274.1Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N20.1Cell motility
Z10.0Cytoskeleton
W00.0Extracellular structures
U250.8Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O682.2Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C1364.3Energy production and conversion
G36611.7Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E2618.3Amino acid transport and metabolism
F842.7Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1073.4Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I922.9Lipid transport and metabolism
P1454.6Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q441.4Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R33310.6General function prediction only
S1896.0Function unknown
-75824.2Not in COGs
Figure 4

Schematic cellular overview of all pathways of the B. faecium strain Schefferle 6-10T metabolism. Nodes represent metabolites, with shape indicating class of metabolite. Lines represent reactions.

Table 5

Metabolic Network Statistics

AttributeValue
Total genes3198
Enzymes674
Enzymatic reactions1031
Metabolic pathways218
Metabolites758
Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. Schematic cellular overview of all pathways of the B. faecium strain Schefferle 6-10T metabolism. Nodes represent metabolites, with shape indicating class of metabolite. Lines represent reactions.
  15 in total

1.  Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Authors:  M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions.

Authors:  J Besemer; A Lomsadze; M Borodovsky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs.

Authors:  Christopher Lee; Catherine Grasso; Mark F Sharlow
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  The Pathway Tools software.

Authors:  Peter D Karp; Suzanne Paley; Pedro Romero
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Expansion of the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases to 160 genomes.

Authors:  Peter D Karp; Christos A Ouzounis; Caroline Moore-Kochlacs; Leon Goldovsky; Pallavi Kaipa; Dag Ahrén; Sophia Tsoka; Nikos Darzentas; Victor Kunin; Núria López-Bigas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes.

Authors:  Sam Griffiths-Jones; Simon Moxon; Mhairi Marshall; Ajay Khanna; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The MetaCyc Database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases.

Authors:  Ron Caspi; Hartmut Foerster; Carol A Fulcher; Pallavi Kaipa; Markus Krummenacker; Mario Latendresse; Suzanne Paley; Seung Y Rhee; Alexander G Shearer; Christophe Tissier; Thomas C Walk; Peifen Zhang; Peter D Karp
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes.

Authors:  Karin Lagesen; Peter Hallin; Einar Andreas Rødland; Hans-Henrik Staerfeldt; Torbjørn Rognes; David W Ussery
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The integrated microbial genomes (IMG) system in 2007: data content and analysis tool extensions.

Authors:  Victor M Markowitz; Ernest Szeto; Krishna Palaniappan; Yuri Grechkin; Ken Chu; I-Min A Chen; Inna Dubchak; Iain Anderson; Athanasios Lykidis; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia N Ivanova; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  12 in total

1.  Genome sequence of Brachybacterium squillarum M-6-3(T), isolated from salt-fermented seafood.

Authors:  Seong-Kyu Park; Seong Woon Roh; Tae Woong Whon; Jin-Woo Bae
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Phylogenetic framework and molecular signatures for the main clades of the phylum Actinobacteria.

Authors:  Beile Gao; Radhey S Gupta
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Antibiotic resistance is prevalent in an isolated cave microbiome.

Authors:  Kirandeep Bhullar; Nicholas Waglechner; Andrew Pawlowski; Kalinka Koteva; Eric D Banks; Michael D Johnston; Hazel A Barton; Gerard D Wright
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The state of standards in genomic sciences.

Authors:  George M Garrity
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2011-12-31

5.  Temporal Relationships Exist Between Cecum, Ileum, and Litter Bacterial Microbiomes in a Commercial Turkey Flock, and Subtherapeutic Penicillin Treatment Impacts Ileum Bacterial Community Establishment.

Authors:  Jessica L Danzeisen; Jonathan B Clayton; Hu Huang; Dan Knights; Brian McComb; Shivdeep S Hayer; Timothy J Johnson
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2015-11-20

6.  Draft Genome Sequence of Brachybacterium phenoliresistens Strain W13A50, a Halotolerant Hydrocarbon-Degrading Bacterium.

Authors:  Xinxin Wang; Zhuo Zhang; Decai Jin; Lisha Zhou; Liang Wu; Chen Li; Libin Zhao; Wei An; Yu Chen
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2014-09-18

7.  Autovaccination confers protection against Devriesea agamarum associated septicemia but not dermatitis in bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps).

Authors:  Tom Hellebuyck; Katleen Van Steendam; Dieter Deforce; Mark Blooi; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh; Evelien Bullaert; Richard Ducatelle; Freddy Haesebrouck; Frank Pasmans; An Martel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Draft genome sequence of an Actinobacterium, Brachybacterium muris strain UCD-AY4.

Authors:  Jonathon R Lo; Jenna M Lang; Aaron E Darling; Jonathan A Eisen; David A Coil
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2013-03-21

9.  ExSPAnder: a universal repeat resolver for DNA fragment assembly.

Authors:  Andrey D Prjibelski; Irina Vasilinetc; Anton Bankevich; Alexey Gurevich; Tatiana Krivosheeva; Sergey Nurk; Son Pham; Anton Korobeynikov; Alla Lapidus; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Bacterial calpains and the evolution of the calpain (C2) family of peptidases.

Authors:  Neil D Rawlings
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 4.540

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.