Literature DB >> 21301704

No time to lose--high throughput screening to assess nanomaterial safety.

R Damoiseaux1, S George, M Li, S Pokhrel, Z Ji, B France, T Xia, E Suarez, R Rallo, L Mädler, Y Cohen, E M V Hoek, A Nel.   

Abstract

Nanomaterials hold great promise for medical, technological and economical benefits. Knowledge concerning the toxicological properties of these novel materials is typically lacking. At the same time, it is becoming evident that some nanomaterials could have a toxic potential in humans and the environment. Animal based systems lack the needed capacity to cope with the abundance of novel nanomaterials being produced, and thus we have to employ in vitro methods with high throughput to manage the rush logistically and use high content readouts wherever needed in order to gain more depth of information. Towards this end, high throughput screening (HTS) and high content screening (HCS) approaches can be used to speed up the safety analysis on a scale that commensurate with the rate of expansion of new materials and new properties. The insights gained from HTS/HCS should aid in our understanding of the tenets of nanomaterial hazard at biological level as well as assist the development of safe-by-design approaches. This review aims to provide a comprehensive introduction to the HTS/HCS methodology employed for safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs), including data analysis and prediction of potentially hazardous material properties. Given the current pace of nanomaterial development, HTS/HCS is a potentially effective means of keeping up with the rapid progress in this field--we have literally no time to lose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21301704      PMCID: PMC3980675          DOI: 10.1039/c0nr00618a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale        ISSN: 2040-3364            Impact factor:   7.790


  88 in total

Review 1.  Origin and evolution of high throughput screening.

Authors:  D A Pereira; J A Williams
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Nanotechnology. Can high-speed tests sort out which nanomaterials are safe?

Authors:  Robert F Service
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Colloidal GaAs quantum wires: solution-liquid-solid synthesis and quantum-confinement studies.

Authors:  Angang Dong; Heng Yu; Fudong Wang; William E Buhro
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 4.  Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective.

Authors:  Mélanie Auffan; Jérôme Rose; Jean-Yves Bottero; Gregory V Lowry; Jean-Pierre Jolivet; Mark R Wiesner
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-09-13       Impact factor: 39.213

5.  Molecular weights of poly(butyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles determined by mass spectrometry and size exclusion chromatography.

Authors:  Alexander Bootz; Thomas Russ; Friedhelm Gores; Michael Karas; Jörg Kreuter
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 5.571

6.  Effect of IFN-gamma on the killing of S. aureus in human whole blood. Assessment of bacterial viability by CFU determination and by a new method using alamarBlue.

Authors:  L E DeForge; K L Billeci; S M Kramer
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  High concordance of drug-induced human hepatotoxicity with in vitro cytotoxicity measured in a novel cell-based model using high content screening.

Authors:  P J O'Brien; W Irwin; D Diaz; E Howard-Cofield; C M Krejsa; M R Slaughter; B Gao; N Kaludercic; A Angeline; P Bernardi; P Brain; C Hougham
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns.

Authors:  M B Eisen; P T Spellman; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy.

Authors:  Steven Gibb
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 10.  Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Günter Oberdörster; Eva Oberdörster; Jan Oberdörster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Single nanoparticle detectors for biological applications.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Yurt; George G Daaboul; John H Connor; Bennett B Goldberg; M Selim Ünlü
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 7.790

2.  Use of metal oxide nanoparticle band gap to develop a predictive paradigm for oxidative stress and acute pulmonary inflammation.

Authors:  Haiyuan Zhang; Zhaoxia Ji; Tian Xia; Huan Meng; Cecile Low-Kam; Rong Liu; Suman Pokhrel; Sijie Lin; Xiang Wang; Yu-Pei Liao; Meiying Wang; Linjiang Li; Robert Rallo; Robert Damoiseaux; Donatello Telesca; Lutz Mädler; Yoram Cohen; Jeffrey I Zink; Andre E Nel
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 15.881

3.  Toxicity of antimony, copper, cobalt, manganese, titanium and zinc oxide nanoparticles for the alveolar and intestinal epithelial barrier cells in vitro.

Authors:  T Titma; R Shimmo; J Siigur; A Kahru
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  Multi-endpoint, high-throughput study of nanomaterial toxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Sang-Kyu Jung; Xiaolei Qu; Boanerges Aleman-Meza; Tianxiao Wang; Celeste Riepe; Zheng Liu; Qilin Li; Weiwei Zhong
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Copper status of exposed microorganisms influences susceptibility to metallic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Vincent C Reyes; Melissa R Spitzmiller; Anne Hong-Hermesdorf; Janette Kropat; Robert D Damoiseaux; Sabeeha S Merchant; Shaily Mahendra
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 6.  Emerging metrology for high-throughput nanomaterial genotoxicology.

Authors:  Bryant C Nelson; Christa W Wright; Yuko Ibuki; Maria Moreno-Villanueva; Hanna L Karlsson; Giel Hendriks; Christopher M Sims; Neenu Singh; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 7.  Implementation of alternative test strategies for the safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  A E Nel
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Particle-induced artifacts in the MTT and LDH viability assays.

Authors:  Amara L Holder; Regine Goth-Goldstein; Donald Lucas; Catherine P Koshland
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Identification of soil bacteria susceptible to TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yuan Ge; Joshua P Schimel; Patricia A Holden
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Custom-designed nanomaterial libraries for testing metal oxide toxicity.

Authors:  Suman Pokhrel; André E Nel; Lutz Mädler
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 22.384

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.