Literature DB >> 21301623

Left ventricular dysfunction due to right ventricular stimulation: is biventricular upgrade really necessary?

T den Besten1, M I Sedney, J Frederiks, N M van Hemel.   

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction can occur due to chronic right ventricular apical pacing. Upgrading of the pacemaker to biventricular pacing is an option to reverse LV dysfunction but reprogramming of the atrioventricular (AV) timing can also be favourable. In this case report we describe the effect of AV-time reprogramming in a patient with LV function deterioration that emerged two years after implantation of a dual chamber system for sick sinus syndrome. Echocardiographc studies demonstrated a tremendous improvement in LV function during two years follow-up whereas the percentage of right ventricular pacing diminished dramatically. Careful analysis of the cause of LV deterioration can avoid unnecessary upgrading to biventricular pacing. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:604-5.).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Right Ventricular Pacing; AV interval; Biventricular Upgrade; Follow up; Heart Failure; Pacemaker

Year:  2010        PMID: 21301623      PMCID: PMC3018606          DOI: 10.1007/s12471-010-0842-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth Heart J        ISSN: 1568-5888            Impact factor:   2.380


  6 in total

Review 1.  Relation between abnormal ventricular impulse conduction and heart failure.

Authors:  Kevin Vernooy; Xander A A M Verbeek; Maaike Peschar; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association.

Authors:  Panos E Vardas; Angelo Auricchio; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Jean-Claude Daubert; Helmut Drexler; Hugo Ector; Maurizio Gasparini; Cecilia Linde; Francisco Bello Morgado; Ali Oto; Richard Sutton; Maria Trusz-Gluza
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Effects of right ventricular pacing on intra-left ventricular electromechanical activation in patients with native narrow QRS.

Authors:  Gabriele Lupi; Biagio Sassone; Luigi Badano; Carlo Peraldo; Oscar Gaddi; Marta Sitges; Fragiskos Parthenakis; Santo Molteni; Maria Rosaria Pagliuca; Nicoletta Grovale; Carlo Menozzi; Michele Brignole
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  The deleterious consequences of right ventricular apical pacing: time to seek alternate site pacing.

Authors:  Antonis S Manolis
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  Routine follow-up after pacemaker implantation: frequency, pacemaker programming and professionals in charge.

Authors:  Jacob W M van Eck; Norbert M van Hemel; Willem G de Voogt; Joan G Meeder; Hans A Spierenburg; Har Crommentuyn; Rens Keijzer; Diederick E Grobbee; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  Eliminating right ventricular pacing may not be best for patients requiring implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Brian Olshansky; John D Day; Darin R Lerew; Scott Brown; Kira Q Stolen
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 6.343

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.