Literature DB >> 16828596

Effects of right ventricular pacing on intra-left ventricular electromechanical activation in patients with native narrow QRS.

Gabriele Lupi1, Biagio Sassone, Luigi Badano, Carlo Peraldo, Oscar Gaddi, Marta Sitges, Fragiskos Parthenakis, Santo Molteni, Maria Rosaria Pagliuca, Nicoletta Grovale, Carlo Menozzi, Michele Brignole.   

Abstract

Some patients with right ventricular (RV) apical pacing show contractile asynchrony of the left ventricle. Whether the asynchrony is due to RV pacing or was a preexistimg condition remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate how much pacing from the RV apex affects left ventricular (LV) electromechanical activation and to assess whether the extent of LV asynchrony during RV pacing can be predicted by clinical, electrocardiographic, or echocardiographic findings obtained during spontaneous rhythm. We evaluated 56 patients with narrow QRS and preserved atrioventricular conduction who received permanent backup RV pacing. Intra-LV electromechanical activation was assessed during spontaneous rhythm and during pacing using tissue Doppler echocardiography. An abnormal intra-LV electromechanical delay (EMD) (defined as a >41-ms difference between the faster and slower activated LV wall) was found in 15 patients (27%) during spontaneous rhythm and 28 patients (50%) during RV pacing (p<0.001). Of the 9 baseline variables (age, gender, history of heart failure, QRS duration in spontaneous rhythm and during pacing, LV end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters, LV ejection fraction, and intra-LV EMD in spontaneous rhythm), an abnormal baseline intra-LV EMD and QRS duration of >85 ms were independent predictors of an abnormal intra-LV delay during RV pacing. RV apical pacing induces asynchrony of LV contractions in a substantial percentage of patients but not in all. Although normal baseline intra-LV electromechanical activation cannot exclude the development of significant asynchrony during RV pacing, the presence of preimplant LV asynchrony predicts for a worsening of this detrimental effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16828596     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  Right Ventricular Versus Biventricular Pacing for Heart Failure and Atrioventricular Block.

Authors:  Hiroko Beck; Anne B Curtis
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2016-10

2.  First-degree atrioventricular block. Clinical manifestations, indications for pacing, pacemaker management & consequences during cardiac resynchronization.

Authors:  S Serge Barold; Arzu Ilercil; Fabio Leonelli; Bengt Herweg
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Left ventricular dysfunction due to right ventricular stimulation: is biventricular upgrade really necessary?

Authors:  T den Besten; M I Sedney; J Frederiks; N M van Hemel
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Torsade de pointes associated with bradycardia and takotsubo cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Satoshi Kurisu; Ichiro Inoue; Takuji Kawagoe; Masaharu Ishihara; Yuji Shimatani; Yasuhara Nakama; Keisuke Ohkawa; Tatsuya Maruhashi; Eisuke Kagawa; Kazuoki Dai; Toshiyuki Aokage
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 5.  Chronic Right Ventricular Pacing in the Heart Failure Population.

Authors:  Justin Gould; Benjamin Sieniewicz; Bradley Porter; Baldeep Sidhu; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-04

6.  Chronic Apical and Nonapical Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients with High-Grade Atrioventricular Block: Results of the Right Pace Study.

Authors:  Carmine Muto; Valeria Calvi; Giovanni Luca Botto; Domenico Pecora; Daniele Porcelli; Alessandro Costa; Gianfranco Ciaramitaro; Riccardo Airò Farulla; Anna Rago; Raimondo Calvanese; Marco Tullio Baratto; Albino Reggiani; Massimo Giammaria; Santina Patané; Monica Campari; Sergio Valsecchi; Giampiero Maglia
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.