Literature DB >> 17599672

Eliminating right ventricular pacing may not be best for patients requiring implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Brian Olshansky1, John D Day, Darin R Lerew, Scott Brown, Kira Q Stolen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Excessive right ventricular (RV) pacing has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients receiving pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). It remains uncertain how much RV pacing is clinically deleterious.
OBJECTIVE: This retrospective analysis assessed the relationship between the amount of RV pacing and the composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization in all patients programmed DDDR in the Inhibition of Unnecessary RV Pacing with AV Search Hysteresis in ICDs (INTRINSIC RV) study.
METHODS: Seven hundred fifteen patients consistently programmed to DDDR mode throughout follow-up (mean 11.6 months) were examined. The relationship between RV pacing tier and death and heart failure hospitalization was determined and compared with patient characteristics.
RESULTS: Across the six RV pacing tiers, patients differed significantly with respect to age, clinical history of ventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and atrial flutter, and amiodarone use. When controlling for these baseline differences, the best outcome was seen in the group with RV pacing between 10% and 19% (2.8% event rate; n = 106). Increasing levels of RV pacing were generally predictive of higher event rates (death or heart failure hospitalization; P = 0.003), except for the group (n = 344) with the least amount of RV pacing (0-9%). This group exhibited poorer outcomes than otherwise expected (P = 0.016), with 8.1% of these patients experiencing an event.
CONCLUSIONS: High levels of RV pacing are associated with heart failure hospitalization and mortality in a large ICD population. However, ICD patients with some RV pacing (10%-19%) exhibit lower event rates compared with those with very low levels (0-9%), possibly due to the physiologically appropriate nature of that RV pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17599672     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.03.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  11 in total

Review 1.  Right ventricular pacing, mechanical dyssynchrony, and heart failure.

Authors:  Alan J Bank; Ryan M Gage; Kevin V Burns
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  [His-bundle stimulation and alternative RV stimulation sites].

Authors:  G Fröhlig; M Kindermann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-03

Review 3.  The importance of avoiding unnecessary right ventricular pacing in clinical practice.

Authors:  Finn Akerström; Miguel A Arias; Marta Pachón; Jesús Jiménez-López; Alberto Puchol; Justo Juliá-Calvo
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-26

Review 4.  First-degree AV block-an entirely benign finding or a potentially curable cause of cardiac disease?

Authors:  Fredrik Holmqvist; James P Daubert
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Midrange ejection fraction as a risk factor for deterioration of cardiofunction after permanent pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Hua He; XiaoDong Li; BingBing Ke; Zhuo Chen; FuSheng Han; YuJie Zeng
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Minimizing right ventricular pacing in sinus node disease: Sometimes the cure is worse than the disease.

Authors:  Elia De Maria; Alina Olaru; Stefano Cappelli
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Performance of atrial tachyarrhythmia-sensing algorithms in dual-chamber pacing using a fixed long AV delay in patients with sinus node dysfunction.

Authors:  Sami Pakarinen; Lauri Toivonen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Left ventricular dysfunction due to right ventricular stimulation: is biventricular upgrade really necessary?

Authors:  T den Besten; M I Sedney; J Frederiks; N M van Hemel
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 9.  Cardiomyopathy induced by artificial cardiac pacing: myth or reality sustained by evidence?

Authors:  Andrés Di Leoni Ferrari; Anibal Pires Borges; Luciano Cabral Albuquerque; Carolina Pelzer Sussenbach; Priscila Raupp da Rosa; Ricardo Medeiros Piantá; Mario Wiehe; Marco Antônio Goldani
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

10.  Benefit of magnetic resonance-conditional cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator: A case of cardiac sarcoidosis-involved cervical extradural lesion.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kawakami; Takayuki Nagai; Taka-Aki Matsuyama; Kazuhisa Nishimura; Jitsuo Higaki; Akiyoshi Ogimoto
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2015-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.