Literature DB >> 21301359

Endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for obstructing pancreas head masses: combined or separate procedures?

Harry R Aslanian1, Juan D Estrada, Federico Rossi, James Dziura, Priya A Jamidar, Uzma D Siddiqui.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are complementary procedures in the evaluation of obstructive jaundice. GOALS: To determine the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of the combined performance of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and ERCP with biliary stenting in patients with obstructive jaundice. STUDY: Retrospectively reviewed data from consecutive patients presenting with obstructive jaundice due to a pancreas mass at a tertiary referral hospital between April 2002 and November 2007 who underwent combined (under the same sedation and in the same room) or separate EUS and ERCP. Procedure duration, amount of sedative medication administered, ability to achieve biliary stent placement, and the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were evaluated: 29 patients underwent combined EUS and ERCP and 18 had separate procedures (median of 5 d between procedures). Stent placement at ERCP was successful in 72% combined procedures versus 88% separate ERCP. EUS-FNA diagnosis of malignancy was positive in 91.6% combined versus 87.5% separate. The only complication was self-limited melena after a combined procedure in 1 patient. The median time for combined procedures was 75 minutes versus 50 minutes for separate EUS and 50 minutes for ERCP.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined EUS and ERCP can be performed under the same sedation with a median 25 minute greater procedure length and similarly high yields for diagnostic EUS-FNA. A nonsignificant trend toward lower biliary stent placement success rates with combined ERCP procedures merits further study. Benefits of a combined procedure may include expedited patient evaluation and the avoidance of repeated sedation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21301359     DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182045923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of the influence of plastic and fully covered metal biliary stents on the accuracy of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ali A Siddiqui; Michael Fein; Thomas E Kowalski; David E Loren; Mohamad A Eloubeidi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

Review 3.  Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography: When should we do it?

Authors:  Renáta Bor; László Madácsy; Anna Fábián; Attila Szepes; Zoltán Szepes
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-08-25

Review 4.  Diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography: assessment of safety and prevention of complications.

Authors:  Christian Jenssen; Maria Victoria Alvarez-Sánchez; Bertrand Napoléon; Siegbert Faiss
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Comparison of ERCP, EUS, and ERCP combined with EUS in diagnosing pancreatic neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongyu Li; Zhigang Hu; Jiang Chen; Xiaozhong Guo
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-06-03

6.  Evaluation of endoscopic cytological diagnosis of unresectable pancreatic cancer prior to and after the introduction of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Ushijima; Yoshinobu Okabe; Yusuke Ishida; Gen Sugiyama; Yu Sasaki; Kei Kuraoka; Makiko Yasumoto; Tomoki Taira; Yoshiki Naito; Masamichi Nakayama; Osamu Tsuruta; Michio Sata
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-14

7.  Impact of biliary stents on the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic head lesions: A multicenter study.

Authors:  Stefano Francesco Crinò; Maria Cristina Conti Bellocchi; Filippo Antonini; Giampiero Macarri; Silvia Carrara; Laura Lamonaca; Roberto Di Mitri; Elisabetta Conte; Carlo Fabbri; Cecilia Binda; Andrew Ofosu; Enrico Gasparini; Chiara Turri; Caterina Stornello; Ciro Celsa; Alberto Larghi; Erminia Manfrin; Armando Gabbrielli; Antonio Facciorusso; Matteo Tacelli
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

8.  Consecutive versus separate sessions of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for symptomatic choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Fabiana Benjaminov; Assaf Stein; George Lichtman; Itamar Pomeranz; Fred M Konikoff
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Safety and utility of single-session endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of pancreatobiliary diseases.

Authors:  Kazumichi Kawakubo; Hiroshi Kawakami; Masaki Kuwatani; Shin Haba; Taiki Kudo; Yoko Abe; Shuhei Kawahata; Manabu Onodera; Nobuyuki Ehira; Hiroaki Yamato; Kazunori Eto; Naoya Sakamoto
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.519

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.