Literature DB >> 24891188

Comparison of ERCP, EUS, and ERCP combined with EUS in diagnosing pancreatic neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hongyu Li1, Zhigang Hu, Jiang Chen, Xiaozhong Guo.   

Abstract

In the current study, we performed a systematic review of literature pertaining to the diagnostic value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and combined ERCP plus EUS to pancreatic cancer. We searched MEDLINE, OVID, and the Cochrane Library for studies evaluating diagnostic validity of ERCP, EUS, and ERCP plus EUS between January 1989 and May 2014. We obtained pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC). A total of 10 studies that included 669 patients who fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria were considered for inclusion in the analysis. The pooled sensitivities of EUS, ERCP, and EUS plus ERCP were 76.7, 57.9, and 79.9 %, respectively. The pooled specificities were 91.7, 90.6, and 94.2 %, respectively. The *Q index estimates were 0.828, 0.862, and 0.896, respectively. The *Q indices for EUS and EUS plus ERCP were significantly higher compared with ERCP (P = 0.010 and 0.008, respectively). Our meta-analysis showed that ERCP plus EUS was associated with a high diagnostic value for the detection of pancreatic neoplasms compared with ERCP and EUS alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24891188     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2154-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  33 in total

1.  Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and determining resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shandra Bipat; Saffire S K S Phoa; Otto M van Delden; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Dirk J Gouma; Johan S Laméris; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Cardiopulmonary complications of ERCP in older patients.

Authors:  Leon Fisher; Alexander Fisher; Andrew Thomson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Echo-enhanced color- and power-Doppler EUS for the discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  D Becker; D Strobel; T Bernatik; E G Hahn
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  John Dewitt; Benedict M Devereaux; Glen A Lehman; Stuart Sherman; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the preoperative assessment of masses in the pancreatic head.

Authors:  B Glasbrenner; M Schwarz; S Pauls; G Preclik; H G Beger; G Adler
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.588

6.  EUS-FNA versus biliary brushings and assessment of simultaneous performance in jaundiced patients with suspected malignant obstruction.

Authors:  Kofi Oppong; Dan Raine; Manu Nayar; Viney Wadehra; Subramaniam Ramakrishnan; Richard M Charnley
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2010-11-09

7.  Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA vs. percutaneous FNA.

Authors:  Carlos Micames; Paul S Jowell; Rebekah White; Erik Paulson; Rendon Nelson; Michael Morse; Herbert Hurwitz; Theodore Pappas; Douglas Tyler; Kevin McGrath
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Intraductal papillary tumors of the pancreas: evaluation with endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  M Sugiyama; Y Atomi; M Saito
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Combined EUS with FNA and ERCP for the evaluation of patients with obstructive jaundice from presumed pancreatic malignancy.

Authors:  William A Ross; Sanjeev M Wasan; Douglas B Evans; Robert A Wolff; Leonard V Trapani; Gregg A Staerkel; Thomas Prindiville; Jeffrey H Lee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  John DeWitt; Benedict Devereaux; Melissa Chriswell; Kathleen McGreevy; Thomas Howard; Thomas F Imperiale; Donato Ciaccia; Kathleen A Lane; Dean Maglinte; Kenyon Kopecky; Julia LeBlanc; Lee McHenry; James Madura; Alex Aisen; Harvey Cramer; Oscar Cummings; Stuart Sherman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Imaging in pancreatic disease.

Authors:  Julien Dimastromatteo; Teresa Brentnall; Kimberly A Kelly
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography: When should we do it?

Authors:  Renáta Bor; László Madácsy; Anna Fábián; Attila Szepes; Zoltán Szepes
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-08-25

3.  The impact of brush cytology from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on patient management at a UK teaching hospital.

Authors:  Rajiv Sethi; Kaushiki Singh; Ben Warner; Ula Mahadeva; Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-29

Review 4.  Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers and CA19-9 for pancreatic cancer: a protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

Authors:  Long Ge; Bei Pan; Fujian Song; Jichun Ma; Dena Zeraatkar; Jianguo Zhou; Jinhui Tian
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Authors:  ZhiYu Zhao; Wei Liu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

6.  Percutaneous Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography for Diagnosis of Pancreatic Tumor.

Authors:  Yotaro Iino; Hitoshi Maruyama; Rintaro Mikata; Shin Yasui; Keisuke Koroki; Hiroki Nagashima; Masami Awatsu; Ayako Shingyoji; Yuko Kusakabe; Kazufumi Kobayashi; Soichiro Kiyono; Masato Nakamura; Hiroshi Ohyama; Harutoshi Sugiyama; Yuji Sakai; Tetsuhiro Chiba; Jun Kato; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Naoya Kato
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-11

Review 7.  Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Yasutaka Ishii; Masahiro Serikawa; Tomofumi Tsuboi; Ryota Kawamura; Ken Tsushima; Shinya Nakamura; Tetsuro Hirano; Ayami Fukiage; Takeshi Mori; Juri Ikemoto; Yusuke Kiyoshita; Sho Saeki; Yosuke Tamura; Sayaka Miyamoto; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-04

Review 8.  Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: What strategies to avoid a foretold catastrophe.

Authors:  Valeria Tonini; Manuel Zanni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-08-21       Impact factor: 5.374

9.  Combined Versus Separate Sessions of Endoscopic Ultrasound and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for the Diagnosis and Management of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Biliary Obstruction.

Authors:  Tugrul Purnak; Ihab I El Hajj; Stuart Sherman; Evan L Fogel; Lee McHenry; Glen Lehman; Mark A Gromski; Mohammad Al-Haddad; John DeWitt; James L Watkins; Jeffrey J Easler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.487

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.