| Literature DB >> 21297986 |
Peter Van den Eede1, Veronica E Soto-Calle, Christopher Delgado, Dionicia Gamboa, Tanilu Grande, Hugo Rodriguez, Alejandro Llanos-Cuentas, Jozef Anné, Umberto D'Alessandro, Annette Erhart.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is an increasing body of literature reporting treatment failure of the currently recommended radical treatment of Plasmodium vivax infections. As P. vivax is the main malaria species outside the African continent, emerging tolerance to its radical treatment regime could have major consequences in countries like Peru, where 80% of malaria cases are due to P. vivax. Here we describe the results of a 1-year longitudinal follow up of 51 confirmed P. vivax patients living around Iquitos, Peruvian Amazon, and treated according to the Peruvian national guidelines.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21297986 PMCID: PMC3030575 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Chronogram of the 29 patients with P. vivax recurrences.
| 2008 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| Patient | Village | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr |
| 1 | Manacamiri |
|
| ||||||||||||
| 2 | Manacamiri |
|
| ||||||||||||
| 3 | Manacamiri |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| 4 | Manacamiri |
|
| ||||||||||||
| 5 | Manacamiri |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| 6 | Manacamiri |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| 7 | Manacamiri |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| 8 | Manacamiri |
|
| ||||||||||||
| 9 | Manacamiri |
|
| ||||||||||||
| 10 | Manacamiri |
|
| ||||||||||||
| 11 | Lupuna |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| 12 | Lupuna |
|
|
| |||||||||||
| 13 | Lupuna |
|
| ||||||||||||
| 14 | Fray Martin |
|
|
| |||||||||||
| 15 | Fray Martin |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| 16 | Fray Martin |
|
| ||||||||||||
| 17 | San Pedro |
|
| ||||||||||||
| 18 | San Pedro |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| 19 | Santa Rita |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| 20 | Santa Rita |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| 21 | Santa Rita |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| 22 | Santa Rita |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| 23 | Santa Rita |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| 24 | Santa Rita |
|
| ||||||||||||
| 25 | Santa Rita |
|
| ||||||||||||
| 26 | Santa Rita |
|
| ||||||||||||
| 27 | Santa Rita |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| 28 | Santa Rita |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| 29 | Santa Rita |
|
| ||||||||||||
X = time of enrolment in the study, S = sub-patent infection, P = patent infections,
* = indicate positive ELISA indicating a recent sporozoite inoculation. Two patients had a positive CSP ELISA at day 0 (April) though no recurrent infections were reported.
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showing the probability of remaining free of P. vivax infection (A, patent and sub-patent; B, only patent) during one-year of follow up.
Figure 2Monthly prevalence of P. vivax patent, sub-patent infections and of anti-CSP antibodies, and monthly rainfall.
Genetic diversity of the 135 positive P. vivax samples analyzed.
| Gene diversity | Allelic Richness | |||||
| Locus | Full | D0 | MF | Full | D0 | MF |
| MS1 | 0.10 | 0,20 | 0.04 | 2.99 | 2,00 | 1.98 |
| MS2 | 0.68 | 0,65 | 0.69 | 4.00 | 3,99 | 4.00 |
| MS3 | 0.61 | 0,67 | 0.56 | 3.98 | 3,00 | 3.95 |
| MS4 | 0.44 | 0,36 | 0.49 | 4.00 | 3,00 | 4.00 |
| MS5 | 0.28 | 0,27 | 0.29 | 2.00 | 2,99 | 2.00 |
| MS6 | 0.62 | 0,64 | 0.62 | 5.96 | 5,00 | 4.94 |
| MS7 | 0.00 | 0,00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1,00 | 1.00 |
| MS8 | 0.84 | 0,74 | 0.84 | 12.00 | 8,00 | 9.00 |
| MS9 | 0.77 | 0,74 | 0.76 | 7.00 | 6,00 | 6.00 |
| MS10 | 0.59 | 0,53 | 0.63 | 5.00 | 4,00 | 4.00 |
| MS12 | 0.68 | 0,64 | 0.70 | 6.93 | 6,00 | 4.00 |
| MS15 | 0.51 | 0,51 | 0.51 | 5.98 | 5,98 | 4.00 |
| MS16 | 0.65 | 0,71 | 0.62 | 11.90 | 5,99 | 8.82 |
| MS20 | 0.72 | 0,75 | 0.71 | 6.95 | 5,00 | 5.86 |
| Pv6635 | 0.75 | 0,72 | 0.76 | 8.00 | 6,00 | 7.00 |
| Pvsal | 0.67 | 0,69 | 0.65 | 7.99 | 6,00 | 7.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Already published in [21]. MF = monthly follow-up. °He: expected heterozygosity.
Figure 3Distribution of the 38 distinct haplotypes over the different episodes (n = 68) by calendar month.