| Literature DB >> 20133996 |
Peter Van den Eede1, Annette Erhart, Gert Van der Auwera, Chantal Van Overmeir, Ngo Duc Thang, Le Xuan Hung, Jozef Anné, Umberto D'Alessandro.
Abstract
Fourteen published and three newly identified polymorphic microsatellites were used to genotype 69 Plasmodium vivax samples obtained from 39 patients detected over a period of two years who lived in a rural community of central Vietnam. All samples were polyclonal with an average expected heterozygosity of 0.86. Among the 39 patients, 16 experienced 1-5 recurrent episodes of P. vivax malaria, most of them (83%) with a different genotype profile compared with previous infections. The minimal set of microsatellites required for differentiating the genotype profiles of the recurrent infections compared with the full set of 17 microsatellites was explored. A combination of five markers was sufficient to identify all recurrent infections with an unrelated or different genotype profile compared with all previous episodes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20133996 PMCID: PMC2813161 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0458
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg ISSN: 0002-9637 Impact factor: 2.345
Characteristics of the 17 Plasmodium vivax microsatellite loci, and their primers in 69 P. vivax samples from central Vietnam
| Locus | Repeat sequence | Primers (5¢®3¢) [5¢ fluorescent dye] | Size range, basepairs | No. alleles | Polyclonal samples/ locus, % | Average alleles/locus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pv6727 | (AGA)19 | F:[PET]-TTAGATGACCAGCCGCTTCAGG | 184–199 | 6 | 0.55 (0.54) | 21 | 1.2 |
| R:CCATCAATGTCCCGCTTAGCACC | |||||||
| Pv6635 | (GGA)4TGG(GGA)18 | F:[NED]-CGTTGACGAGGCTCTCCAGG | 164–194 | 11 | 0.85 (0.86) | 86 | 2 |
| R:CGTGTTGTGTGTGTCCCTTCAGC | |||||||
| Pvsal1814 | (AGA)44 | F:[6FAM]-AAACAGGCATTAGGTTTAAGAGTG | 515–677 | 41 | 0.96 (0.96) | 87 | 2.8 |
| R:CAGTGGCTTCTTCTTTAGTGG | |||||||
| MS1 | Karunaweera et al. | Karunaweera et al. | 214–241 | 11 | 0.85 (0.82) | 51 | 1.7 |
| MS2 | 170–315 | 32 | 0.96 (0.96) | 53 | 1.9 | ||
| MS3 | 182–200 | 9 | 0.76 (0.77) | 7 | 1.1 | ||
| MS4 | 185–266 | 17 | 0.87 (0.86) | 57 | 1.6 | ||
| MS5 | 157–291 | 17 | 0.92 (0.92) | 71 | 2 | ||
| MS6 | 157–260 | 19 | 0.91 (0.89) | 78 | 2.2 | ||
| MS7 | 138–212 | 11 | 0.83 (0.87) | 16 | 1.3 | ||
| MS8 | 201–304 | 24 | 0.95 (0.95) | 47 | 1.6 | ||
| MS9 | 139–182 | 18 | 0.88 (0.88) | 79 | 1.9 | ||
| MS10 | 184–225 | 14 | 0.90 (0.91) | 19 | 1 | ||
| MS12 | 206–235 | 9 | 0.78 (0.76) | 32 | 1.5 | ||
| MS15 | 203–297 | 21 | 0.91 (0.91) | 70 | 2 | ||
| MS16 | 183–321 | 22 | 0.92 (0.94) | 12 | 1 | ||
| MS20 | 189–229 | 14 | 0.81 (0.87) | 80 | 1.9 |
The number of repeats is based on the Sal-1 strain.
He = expected heterozygosity calculated from the total sample population.
Overall classification and genetic complexity of Plasmodium vivax infections in 16 patients with 1–5 recurrent episodes*
| Patient | Total recurrences | Median delay (weeks) | Related | Unrelated | Novel | Median MOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fully | Partially | ||||||
| 301302 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 301608 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 301613 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 305405 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 307303 | 1 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 307904 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 308903 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 308906 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 308907 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 300705 | 2 | 2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 301502 | 2 | 14.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 305101 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 307602 | 2 | 17.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 305302 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 308301 | 4 | 8.5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| 307607 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Total | 29 | 2 | 3 | 24 | |||
MOI = multiplicity of infection.
Figure 1.Schematic overview of the sample classification when applying sequentially the five selected microsatellites for Plasmodium vivax shown in colored boxes. The first boxes (*) show results of episodes classified with all 17 microsatellites. At each step, the locus with the highest discriminatory power (ability to identify unrelated infections) was added until all unrelated infections were identified. One of the three partially related samples was misclassified as fully related (**) when five loci were used.