Literature DB >> 2317602

Response times to speech stimuli as measures of benefit from amplification.

S Gatehouse1, J Gordon.   

Abstract

The benefits of management of hearing disability, in particular by provision of a hearing aid, are traditionally assessed by the percentage improvement in performance on a speech identification task. To provide precise and stable results, such procedures require more time than is available in most clinical settings. In any stressed performance, e.g. an impaired individual trying to listen in noise, there is a trading relationship between accuracy and effort (the cost at which accuracy is achieved). If the control of performance naturally spends effort to stabilize high performance, then benefit from amplification may essentially comprise and be measurable as reduction in effort rather than improvement in accuracy. Certainly complaints of hearing disability emphasize fatigue from careful listening. Hence a hearing aid may not only enable hearing impaired persons to hear more of speech but may enable them to hear it more easily, thus reflecting a second dimension to disability and benefit. Ease of listening was investigated using auditory response times to speech stimuli of two levels of structure: single words and sentences. The speech material was presented to 44 experienced hearing aid users (mild to moderate sensorineural hearing impairment). The speech was presented both unaided and aided at presentation levels of 60, 70 and 80 dB SPL and signal-to-noise ratios of quiet and + 5 dB. Response times were taken to the tokens within each list that were correctly identified. Benefit is defined as the decrease in response time from the unaided to the aided condition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2317602     DOI: 10.3109/03005369009077843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Audiol        ISSN: 0300-5364


  30 in total

1.  Psychometric Functions of Dual-Task Paradigms for Measuring Listening Effort.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Xuyang Zhang; Joanna Perkins; Emily Eilers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Listening and Learning: Cognitive Contributions to the Rehabilitation of Older Adults With and Without Audiometrically Defined Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Kristina C Backer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Stuart Gatehouse: the international perspective.

Authors:  Dianne J Van Tasell; Harry Levitt
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

4.  Verbal Response Times as a Potential Indicator of Cognitive Load During Conventional Speech Audiometry With Matrix Sentences.

Authors:  Hartmut Meister; Sebastian Rählmann; Ulrike Lemke; Jana Besser
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Mandarin Tone and Vowel Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Talker Variability and Bimodal Hearing.

Authors:  Yi-Ping Chang; Ronald Y Chang; Chun-Yi Lin; Xin Luo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Commentary: listening can be exhausting--fatigue in children and adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Fred H Bess; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Listening Effort in Adults With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Julia Gordon; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The effects of limited bandwidth and noise on verbal processing time and word recall in normal-hearing children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Kenneth I Vaden; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Measuring listening effort: driving simulator versus simple dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Nazan Aksan; Matthew Rizzo; Elizabeth Stangl; Xuyang Zhang; Ruth Bentler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.