Qi Wei1, Nigel Collier. 1. Department of Informatics, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (Sokendai), 2-1-2 Hitotsubashi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo. collier@nii.ac.jp.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In recent years high throughput methods have led to a massive expansion in the free text literature on molecular biology. Automated text mining has developed as an application technology for formalizing this wealth of published results into structured database entries. However, database curation as a task is still largely done by hand, and although there have been many studies on automated approaches, problems remain in how to classify documents into top-level categories based on the type of organism being investigated. Here we present a comparative analysis of state of the art supervised models that are used to classify both abstracts and full text articles for three model organisms. RESULTS: Ablation experiments were conducted on a large gold standard corpus of 10,000 abstracts and full papers containing data on three model organisms (fly, mouse and yeast). Among the eight learner models tested, the best model achieved an F-score of 97.1% for fly, 88.6% for mouse and 85.5% for yeast using a variety of features that included gene name, organism frequency, MeSH headings and term-species associations. We noted that term-species associations were particularly effective in improving classification performance. The benefit of using full text articles over abstracts was consistently observed across all three organisms. CONCLUSIONS: By comparing various learner algorithms and features we presented an optimized system that automatically detects the major focus organism in full text articles for fly, mouse and yeast. We believe the method will be extensible to other organism types.
BACKGROUND: In recent years high throughput methods have led to a massive expansion in the free text literature on molecular biology. Automated text mining has developed as an application technology for formalizing this wealth of published results into structured database entries. However, database curation as a task is still largely done by hand, and although there have been many studies on automated approaches, problems remain in how to classify documents into top-level categories based on the type of organism being investigated. Here we present a comparative analysis of state of the art supervised models that are used to classify both abstracts and full text articles for three model organisms. RESULTS: Ablation experiments were conducted on a large gold standard corpus of 10,000 abstracts and full papers containing data on three model organisms (fly, mouse and yeast). Among the eight learner models tested, the best model achieved an F-score of 97.1% for fly, 88.6% for mouse and 85.5% for yeast using a variety of features that included gene name, organism frequency, MeSH headings and term-species associations. We noted that term-species associations were particularly effective in improving classification performance. The benefit of using full text articles over abstracts was consistently observed across all three organisms. CONCLUSIONS: By comparing various learner algorithms and features we presented an optimized system that automatically detects the major focus organism in full text articles for fly, mouse and yeast. We believe the method will be extensible to other organism types.
Authors: Laurie Issel-Tarver; Karen R Christie; Kara Dolinski; Rey Andrada; Rama Balakrishnan; Catherine A Ball; Gail Binkley; Stan Dong; Selina S Dwight; Dianna G Fisk; Midori Harris; Mark Schroeder; Anand Sethuraman; Kane Tse; Shuai Weng; David Botstein; J Michael Cherry Journal: Methods Enzymol Date: 2002 Impact factor: 1.600
Authors: Ian Donaldson; Joel Martin; Berry de Bruijn; Cheryl Wolting; Vicki Lay; Brigitte Tuekam; Shudong Zhang; Berivan Baskin; Gary D Bader; Katerina Michalickova; Tony Pawson; Christopher W V Hogue Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2003-03-27 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Fabio Rinaldi; Thomas Kappeler; Kaarel Kaljurand; Gerold Schneider; Manfred Klenner; Simon Clematide; Michael Hess; Jean-Marc von Allmen; Pierre Parisot; Martin Romacker; Therese Vachon Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2008-09-01 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Mustafa H Gunturkun; Efraim Flashner; Tengfei Wang; Megan K Mulligan; Robert W Williams; Pjotr Prins; Hao Chen Journal: G3 (Bethesda) Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 3.542