Literature DB >> 21290095

[The work of the Cochrane Collaboration in urology].

F Kunath1, M Pittler, H Grobe, B Wullich, G Antes.   

Abstract

The Cochrane Collaboration collects medical information from clinical trials and presents the results as systematic reviews. The aim of these evidence-based publications is to enable medical decisions which are based on the best available evidence and to improve knowledge transfer in healthcare decisions. Accurately developed systematic reviews identify relevant clinical trials, evaluate their quality, abstract the results and are being published in an increasing frequency in professional urological journals. The Cochrane Library provides, with diverse databases, a quick overview of the best available evidence in urology. The quality of systematic reviews depends on the quality of the included studies. A checklist provided by the PRISMA statement could help authors and thereby readers to improve methodology and recommendations in evidence-based urology.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21290095     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-010-2490-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  10 in total

1.  Evaluating meta-analyses in the general surgical literature: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Elijah Dixon; Morad Hameed; Francis Sutherland; Deborah J Cook; Christopher Doig
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Role of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Stefan Sauerland; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study.

Authors:  M R Tramèr; D J Reynolds; R A Moore; H J McQuay
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-13

4.  [Handsearching for randomized controlled clinical trials in German medical journals].

Authors:  A Blümle; G Antes
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.628

5.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  [Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in surgery].

Authors:  M K Diener; C M Seiler; G Antes
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  [Evidence-based medicine].

Authors:  G Antes
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects.

Authors:  J M Stern; R J Simes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-13

9.  Rationale for systematic reviews.

Authors:  C D Mulrow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-03

10.  Making medicine more scientific.

Authors:  H Hiatt; L Goldman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-09-08       Impact factor: 49.962

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.