OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of Unsynchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) in prevention of extubation failure in mechanically ventilated preterm neonates weighing less than 2,000 g. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital. Preterm neonates weighing less than 2,000 g, mechanically ventilated for more than 24 h were included after extubation. Neonates were randomized into two groups. Group 1 was given unsynchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation with shortened endotracheal tube by ventilator and Group 2 was given head box oxygen, fraction of oxygen in inspired air was 50%. Primary outcome variable was rate of extubation failure within 72 h of extubation. RESULTS: Birth weight, gestational age, age at intubation, indication for mechanical ventilation and antenatal details were comparable in the two groups. Extubation failure rate was 16% in Group 1 vs 63% in Group 2 (RR = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.51, p value = 0.00), that is a reduction of 47%. Unsynchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation did not have any serious side effects, however it did not reduce total hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS:Unsynchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation is a simple technique of noninvasive ventilation which significantly reduces the rate of extubation failure in preterm neonates and is not associated with serious side effects.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of Unsynchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) in prevention of extubation failure in mechanically ventilated preterm neonates weighing less than 2,000 g. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital. Preterm neonates weighing less than 2,000 g, mechanically ventilated for more than 24 h were included after extubation. Neonates were randomized into two groups. Group 1 was given unsynchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation with shortened endotracheal tube by ventilator and Group 2 was given head box oxygen, fraction of oxygen in inspired air was 50%. Primary outcome variable was rate of extubation failure within 72 h of extubation. RESULTS: Birth weight, gestational age, age at intubation, indication for mechanical ventilation and antenatal details were comparable in the two groups. Extubation failure rate was 16% in Group 1 vs 63% in Group 2 (RR = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.51, p value = 0.00), that is a reduction of 47%. Unsynchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation did not have any serious side effects, however it did not reduce total hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Unsynchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation is a simple technique of noninvasive ventilation which significantly reduces the rate of extubation failure in preterm neonates and is not associated with serious side effects.